If we could imagine the Word as a Heavenly Barnes and
Noble's, what section would you most like be found in?
The prophecy buffs would be easy to find, right on the corner
of Daniel and Revelation. Those no nonsense, down to business
types would be enjoying a double cappuccino over in the James
section. There would probably be quite a crowd of natural born
encouragers hanging out in the Gospel of John stacks. We would
see the deep thinkers would be parked in their comfy couches
over in the book of Romans.
But over in the corner marked "Ecclesiastes", well,
there would probably be plenty of good seats still available.
Let's face it, this sad book, written by an aging King
Solomon is not light reading. The life lessons learned by a man
who had too much of God to be happy in the world, and too much
of the world to be happy in God can be quite a downer. But since
Ecclesiastes was written by one of the most brilliant men to
ever live on this planet, there are some amazing insights to be
found in its pages.
Try this one on for size.
Sorrow is better than laughter,
For when a
face is sad a heart may be happy.
The mind of the wise is in the house of
mourning,
While the
mind of fools is in the house of pleasure. (Ecclesiastes 7:3-4)
Now Solomon isn't suggesting we go through life with our
lower lip dragging on the ground. But there are certain
absolutely invaluable lessons we can learn only by going through
hard times.
A classic example of a perspective on what really matters in
life gained by paying some pretty substantial tuition in the
school of hard knocks moved on the wire services today.
DAVIDSON, N.C. (AP) - White House Press Secretary Tony
Snow, who'll soon begin chemotherapy for a cancer recurrence,
told fellow alumni at Davidson College Saturday that he felt
great and plans to return to work on Monday.
"No, it doesn't mean I'm going to be gray, shriveled
and in the fetal position," he told about 600 alumni and
family members at a 30-year reunion. "To my classmates
who think I'm going to lose my great hair, forget about
it."
Snow, 51, has been on medical leave following a March 27
announcement that doctors determined a growth in his abdominal
area was cancerous and had metastasized, or spread, to the
liver.
Snow had his colon removed in 2005 and underwent six months
of chemotherapy after being diagnosed with colon cancer.
He graduated from Davidson in 1977. While Snow originally
planned just to attend the reunion, Davidson officials said he
agreed to speak to students on Friday and alumni on Saturday,
The Charlotte Observer reported.
During an impromptu question and answer session Saturday,
Snow said he has become closer to God and his family because
of the cancer.
"I am actually enjoying everything more than I ever
have," he said. "God hasn't promised us tomorrow,
but He has promised us eternity."
What Solomon expressed, Tony Snow has realized. We tend to
carry with us an illusion of indestructability. Death is
something that happens to other people, certainly not us. The
reality of eternity seems a step removed from our thinking.
And then the phone rings. The doctor says, "I'm
sorry..". Everything changes.
But one thing never will - God's amazing love for us.
What then shall we say to these things? If God is
for us, who can be against us? He who did not spare His
own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not
with Him also freely give us all things? Who shall bring a
charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies.
Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died,
and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand
of God, who also makes intercession for us. Who shall separate
us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or
distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril,
or sword? As it is written:
“ For Your sake we
are killed all day long; We are accounted as
sheep for the slaughter.”
Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through
Him who loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death nor
life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things
present nor things to come, nor height nor depth, nor any
other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the
love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. (Romans
8:31-39)
The person who lives this life with a weather eye on the
next, is the person who ultimately will enjoy this life to the
fullest.
There is an old saying that imparts a time tested bit of
wisdom - "In every argument there are three sides - Yours,
mine and the right one."
In my journey through the Christian life I have found this to
be inescapably true.
There have been times when I have taken bold stands on
controversial issues that had more to do with respect for
certain earthly teachers than a clear understanding of the
Scriptures. I have even taken positions on certain issues mainly
because I didn't particularly care for a particularly rude and
offensive proponent of the opposite point of view.
Let's face it, the desire to please certain people, to belong
to a certain group, or to put a healthy distance between
ourselves and others we don't respect are not the most effective
ways to discover how God looks at a particular issue.
Take for instance my experience with the issue of the gifts
of the Holy Spirit. Talk about an issue that tends to generate a
lot more heat than light in Christian circles!
Early on in my Christian experience I didn't see what the big
hubbub was about. I read I Corinthians 12-14. OK. There are
special gifts that are given to believers through the power of
the Holy Spirit (Chapter 12). Whatever gift or gifts we have are
worthless without love (I Corinthians 13). Here's how the gifts
should be practiced decently and in order (Chapter 14).
No big deal. Relax and enjoy.
That is until one traumatic incident changed the whole way I
looked at the gifts.
I was just starting to attend a non denominational church in
Ventura, California. The pastor was a gifted evangelist. I mean,
this guy could do an invitation at the end of a sermon that
would bring everyone in the place who had a functioning
conscience to the front for prayer!
The only problem was with the "decently and in
order" part.
Some Sundays things would be mellow and laid back. The Word
of God would be shared in power. People would get saved and
altar call regulars like me would go forward at the end of the
service and be blessed.
Other times, however..Yikes!
Pew jumpin', roll-on-the floor-old-time-religion would break
out.
I'd ask an elder, "What was that?"
"I don't know, but it sure felt good!", would be
the reply.
Then came the fateful day. My Dad, trying his best to figure
out this "born again" thing his son was into, asked if
he could go to church with me sometime.
"Great! Let's go tonight!"
I was so excited! I had been praying for my Dad since I
came to know the Lord. He was nominally Episcopalian, but had
told us often that religion was something for little old ladies
and people who didn't sleep well at night.
My Dad? At church? What an answer to prayer!
Or at least I thought it was. Then this possibility dawned on
me - What if tonight was "Wild Kingdom Night" in
Ventura?
No! The thought was too traumatic to entertain. "You
wouldn't do that to me, would You Lord?"
And so we went to church. I was as nervous as the proverbial
long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.
The service began with the standard opening song,
"All hail the power of Jesus' name! Let angels
prostrate fall! Bring forth the royal diadem and crown Him Lord
of Lords!"
No craziness. No outbursts. The residents of the Wild Kingdom
seemed to be in hibernation.
Announcements began. Let's face it - announcements are
probably the least spiritual part of any church service. I
relaxed. Just a couple of more songs and we'll be home free to
the sermon!
Then it happened.
Right in the middle of a particularly inspiring word
concerning the upcoming church picnic, a rather large woman in a
floral print Hawaiian Muumuu stood up right in front of us. She
threw back her huge arms, narrowly missing my Dad! She then
proceeded to bellow out in an unknown tongue with the melodic
tone of a wounded seal.
I stared straight ahead, every muscle in my neck tensed. I
couldn't bring myself to look over at how my Episcopalian raised
Dad was reacting to this display.
When I finally peeked over, I saw my Dad roll his eyes and
slowly shake his head.
That which I had greatly feared had come to pass.
Billy Graham could have been the guest pastor that night and
it wouldn't have made a dent in his heart. The damage had been
done.
I walked out into the damp and foggy coastal California night
at a loss for words. I only knew this: To paraphrase Scarlett
O'Hara in "Gone With the Wind", I said to myself,
"With God as my witness, I will never be embarrassed like
that in church ever again!"
And so, I allowed one overly enthusiastic woman in a floral
print Muumuu to figuratively rip I Corinthians 12 and 14 out of
my Bible.
I immediately went and joined a church where they taught that
the gifts of the Holy Spirit (apart maybe from "helps"
or "administrations") had died off with the last
apostle.
I would argue strongly for that position with friends who
were from the other side of the church fence on the issue.
It would drive me crazy when a particularly good friend would
ask, "Where in the Bible does it say that the gifts of the
Spirit aren't for today?"
I would try to piece together a case from I Corinthians 13:8
("where there are tongues they shall cease"), but in
all honesty my position was more about passion generated by bad
experience than principle.
It took some real rocking in my world to bring me back to an
important consideration. Just because some people misuse and
even abuse the gifts of the Spirit, does that change anything
the Bible has to say on the subject?
The crucial missing piece of the puzzle on both sides of this
issue is found again in a remarkably simple set of instructions
found in I Corinthians 14.
Therefore if the whole church comes together in one place,
and all speak with tongues, and there come in those who are
uninformed or unbelievers, will they not say that you are out of
your mind?How is it then, brethren? Whenever you come together, each
of you has a psalm, has a teaching, has a tongue, has a
revelation, has an interpretation. Let all things be done for
edification. For God is not the author of confusion
but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints. Therefore,
brethren, desire earnestly to prophesy, and do not forbid to
speak with tongues. Let all things be done decently and in
order. (I Corinthians 14:23, 26, 33, 39-40)
What it took years for the Lord to teach me was that truth
wasn't to be found in reaction, but in revelation - the clear
teaching of His Word. There is a place for the supernatural
gifts of the Spirit. But the Holy Spirit doesn't move
chaotically. He will only move in harmony with His Word.
I don't want to find myself defending some emotion driven dog
and pony show that exalts the emotions and does little to build
true devotion to Jesus. But neither do I want to become a member
of the "frozen chosen", so wise in my own eyes that I
feel like I can tell God what and when His Spirit can
work.
Both sides of this controversy seem to get irritated with me
these days. My Baptist friends call me Pentecostal and my
Pentecostal friends call me a Baptist. I guess that makes me a
Bapticostal!
But if we can set aside our commitment to experience and ask
God to teach us what His Word has to say on the subject we can
return to a beautiful simplicity and enjoyment of the true work
of the Spirit in our lives.
And what could be better than that?
(For a remarkably well balanced book on the Gifts of the Holy
Spirit, visit our "Resource Offers" section and order
a copy of "Living Water" by Pastor Chuck Smith
- You'll be glad you did!)
Scott's Blog - 4/26/07
Can We Have Cake and Eat It Too Without Getting a
Spiritual Bellyache?
“It is the knowledge and experience of the Incarnation, the
wisdom and warnings given by Jesus in the Gospels, and not least
the Resurrection that in the final analysis are all that
matters."
Hard to argue with that.
Unless you consider the source and what he stands for.
This quote comes from Dr. Simon Conway Morris, a British paleontologist
and professor of evolutionary paleontology at Cambridge
University in England. He was honored this week with the Trotter
Prize for outstanding work in the field of origins studies.
Morris is most noted for his research on the "Cambrian
Explosion", a layer of fossil strata that indicates an
incredible variety of highly developed life forms came on the
scene in a remarkably abrupt manner. His research is thoroughly
grounded in Darwinian evolutionary concepts, to the point where
he has spoken out publicly against the concept of Intelligent
Design.
Yet he claims not only to be a Christian, but a believer in
the actual historical resurrection of Jesus from the dead.
The big question - can we have it both ways?
Morris certainly thinks so. Along with his seemingly biblical
statement of faith, he delivered a lecture at Baylor University
this week entitled "Darwin's Compass: How Evolution
Discovers the Song of Creation." Doug Huntington of the
Christian Post provides this review:
Yet in almost the same breath he states, "There is no
reason an evolutionary biologist could not subscribe to
something transcendent," explained Morris to the Baylor
Lariat, Baylor University’s student newspaper. "It would
be a mistake to assume that all scientists are materialists, and
they are not."Christian 'Origins' Expert Promotes Evolution at Texas Universities Christianpost.com
So can we have it both ways? Is there a balancing act that
can be mastered between an evolutionary world view and
confidence in the teaching of Jesus?
Some have tried to pull this off by trying to put up a wall
between spiritual and physical reality. "When I want to
find out about Heaven, I turn to the Scriptures. When I want to
find out about Earth I turn to science." Or so the argument
goes.
And that approach just might work - if we ignore the
Scriptures.
Inconvenient truths from the mouth of Jesus like,
"If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how
will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?" (John
3:12)
Jesus refused to allow His truth to be pigeon holed into some
ultimately irrelevant corner of our consciousness. What the
Bible tells us about earthly events, including our origins, is
just as trustworthy as what it has to say about our final
destination.
What has Jesus told us about "earthly things"?
Rather than seeing humanity as an "inevitable" product of
nearly random chance and millions of years of natural selection,
Jesus said:
"But from the beginning of the creation, God ‘made
them male and female."(Mark 10:6)
Natural selection as the driving force of creation also runs
into some major problems both scientifically and biblically.
Following the end of the sixth day of creation, God had an
interesting comment on the state of things.
Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it
was very good. So the evening and the morning were the sixth
day. (Genesis 1:31)
The phrase, "very good" in Hebrew is
emphatic. All creation was exactly as God intended it to be.
If we try to wedge evolutionism into this statement we run
into a theological brick wall. What kind of God would look at a
creation driven by "natural selection" - that is not
only the survival of the fittest, but the continual death of the
unfit, and pronounce it "very good"? The kind of God
who would set up a system of misery, suffering, "nature red
in fang and claw" is not the God Who reveals Himself to us
in the Bible.
What about the death and resurrection of Jesus? Can this be
held in the same breath as Darwinism?
Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world,
and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because
all sinned— (For until the law sin was in the world, but sin
is not imputed when there is no law. Nevertheless death reigned
from Adam to Moses, even over those who had not sinned according
to the likeness of the transgression of Adam, who is a type of
Him who was to come. But the free gift is not like the
offense. For if by the one man’s offense many died, much more
the grace of God and the gift by the grace of the one Man, Jesus
Christ, abounded to many. And the gift is not like that
which came through the one who sinned. For the judgment which
came from one offense resulted in condemnation, but
the free gift which came from many offenses resulted
in justification. For if by the one man’s offense death
reigned through the one, much more those who receive abundance
of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life
through the One, Jesus Christ.)
Therefore, as through one man’s offense judgment came
to all men, resulting in condemnation, even so through one
Man’s righteous act the free gift came to all men,
resulting in justification of life. For as by one man’s
disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man’s
obedience many will be made righteous. (Romans 6:12-19)
It doesn't take much deep thought to see that the Bible tells
us death was the result of Adam's sin, not the driving force of
God's creative process. Defeating sin, the ultimate cause of
death in this world was why Jesus became a man at the
incarnation. Taking advantage of God's victory over sin and
death was the main point of Jesus' teaching. Defeating the last
enemy, death, was the reason for His resurrection.
Where does any of this fit into Darwinism?
It doesn't.
And so we must make a choice. Who will we believe?
The funny thing about Dr. Morris' "origins
studies" is that they must be taken on faith. No one was
there to witness the "Cambrian explosion". The speculations
the good Doctor is lauded for are neither testable or
repeatable. They took place in an inaccessible past. All
conclusions are based on unprovable assumptions. They must be
taken on faith.
On the other hand, we must ask, "Why should we believe
Jesus?"
Aside from a sinless, miraculous life that fulfilled over 100
specific Old Testament prophecies, and a historically verifiable
resurrection from the dead, I can't think of much.
What we believe about origins must go hand in hand with what
we believe about the One who was behind it all. Jesus Christ,
the Creator, has given us insight enough to see all things from
His consistent, trustworthy world view.
Let's not fall into the trap of trying to please the God
rejecting world by embracing a view of origins founded on
atheism, while trying to please the God Who created all things
at the same time.
It simply can't be done.
Scott's Blog - 4/25/07
A Privileged Planet?
It is an established fact of human nature that people tend to
see only the things they really want to see. Proof positive of
this phenomenon happens every Spring when fans of the Chicago
Cubs inevitably say "This year is gonna be our year!"
By the first of June the hard facts of life and the disabled
list will rob us of our illusions.
But this tendency to either ignore the facts or embellish
reasons for hope beyond all reason isn't just the province of
misguided major league baseball fans. It can happen with the
white lab coat set as well. Consider this eye catching headline
story - complete with realistic looking sci-fi graphics.
ESO
Artist's impression of the planetary system around the red
dwarf Gliese 581. Using the instrument HARPS on the ESO 3.6-m
telescope, astronomers have uncovered 3 planets, all of
relative low-mass: 5, 8 and 15 Earth masses.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- European astronomers have found
the most Earth-like planet outside our solar system, and here's
what it might be like to live there:
The "sun" wouldn't burn brightly. It would hang
close, large and red in the sky, glowing faintly like a charcoal
ember. And it probably would never set if you lived on the sunny
side of the planet.
You could have a birthday party every 13 days because
that's how fast this new planet circles its sun-like star. But
watch the cake -- you'd weigh a whole lot more than you do on
Earth.
You might be able to keep your current wardrobe. The
temperature in this alien setting will likely be a lot like
Earth's -- not too hot, not too cold.
And that "just right" temperature is one key
reason astronomers think this planet could conceivably house
life outside our solar system. It's also as close to Earth-sized
as telescopes have ever spotted. Both elements make it the first
potentially habitable planet besides Earth or Mars.
Astronomers who announced the discovery of the new planet
Tuesday say this puts them closer to answering the cosmic
question: Are we alone?
"It's a significant step on the way to finding
possible life in the universe," said University of Geneva
astronomer Michel Mayor, one of 11 European scientists on the
team that found the new body. "It's a nice discovery. We
still have a lot of questions."
There's still a lot that is unknown about the new planet,
which could be deemed inhospitable to life once more is learned
about it. But as galaxies go, it's practically a neighbor. At
only 120 trillion miles away, the red dwarf star that this
planet circles is one of the 100 closest to Earth.
The results of the discovery have not been published but
have been submitted to the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Alan Boss, who works at the Carnegie Institution of
Washington where a U.S. team of astronomers competed in the hunt
for an Earth-like planet, called it "a major milestone in
this business."
The planet was discovered by the European Southern
Observatory's telescope in La Silla, Chile, which has a special
instrument that splits light to find wobbles in different
wavelengths. Those wobbles can reveal the existence of other
worlds.
What they revealed is a planet circling the red dwarf
star, Gliese 581. Red dwarfs are low-energy, tiny stars that
give off dim red light and last longer than stars like our sun.
Until a few years ago, astronomers didn't consider these stars
as possible hosts of planets that might sustain life.
The discovery of the new planet, named 581 c, is sure to
fuel studies of planets circling similar dim stars. About 80
percent of the stars near Earth are red dwarfs.
The new planet is about five times heavier than Earth, and
gravity there would be 1.6 times as strong as Earth's. Its
discoverers aren't certain if it is rocky like Earth or if its a
frozen ice ball with liquid water on the surface. If it is rocky
like Earth, which is what the prevailing theory proposes, it has
a diameter about 11/2 times bigger than our planet. If it is an
iceball, as Mayor suggests, it would be even bigger.
Based on theory, 581 c should have an atmosphere, but
what's in that atmosphere is still a mystery and if it's too
thick that could make the planet's surface temperature too hot,
Mayor said.
However, the research team believes the average
temperature to be somewhere between 32 and 104 degrees and that
set off celebrations among astronomers.
Until now, all 220 planets astronomers have found outside
our solar system have had the "Goldilocks problem."
They've been too hot, too cold or just plain too big and
gaseous, like uninhabitable Jupiter.
The new planet seems just right -- or at least that's what
scientists think.
"This could be very important," said NASA
astrobiology expert Chris McKay, who was not part of the
discovery team. "It doesn't mean there is life, but it
means it's an Earth-like planet in terms of potential
habitability."
Eventually astronomers will rack up discoveries of dozens,
maybe even hundreds of planets considered habitable, the
astronomers said. But this one -- simply called "c" by
its discoverers when they talk among themselves -- will go down
in cosmic history as No. 1.
Besides having the right temperature, the new planet is
probably full of liquid water, hypothesizes Stephane Udry, the
discovery team's lead author and another Geneva astronomer. But
that is based on theory about how planets form, not on any
evidence, he said.
"Liquid water is critical to life as we know
it," co-author Xavier Delfosse of Grenoble University in
France, said in a statement. "Because of its temperature
and relative proximity, this planet will most probably be a very
important target of the future space missions dedicated to the
search for extraterrestrial life. On the treasure map of the
Universe, one would be tempted to mark this planet with an
X."
Other astronomers cautioned it's too early to tell whether
there is water.
"You need more work to say it's got water or it
doesn't have water," said retired NASA astronomer Steve
Maran, press officer for the American Astronomical Society.
"You wouldn't send a crew there assuming that when you get
there, they'll have enough water to get back."
The new planet's star system is a mere 20.5 light years
away, making Gliese 581 one of the 100 closest stars to Earth.
It's so dim, you can't see it without a telescope, but it's
somewhere in the constellation Libra, which is low in the
southeastern sky during the mid-evening in the Northern
Hemisphere.
Even so, Maran noted, "We don't know how to get to
those places in a human lifetime."
But, oh, the view, if you could. The planet is 14 times
closer to the star it orbits. Udry figures the red dwarf star
would hang in the sky at a size 20 times larger than our moon.
And it's likely, but still not known, that the planet doesn't
rotate, so one side would always be sunlit and the other dark.
Two teams of astronomers, one in Europe and one in the
United States, have been racing to be the first to find a planet
like 581 c outside the solar system.
The European team looked at 100 different stars using a
tool called HARPS (High Accuracy Radial Velocity for Planetary
Searcher) to find this one planet, said Xavier Bonfils of the
Lisbon Observatory, one of the co-discoverers.
Much of the effort to find Earth-like planets has focused
on stars like our sun with the challenge being to find a planet
the right distance from the star it orbits. About 90 percent of
the time, the European telescope focused its search more on
sun-like stars, Udry said.
A few weeks before the European discovery earlier this
month, a scientific paper in the journal Astrobiology theorized
a few days that red dwarf stars were good candidates.
"Now we have the possibility to find many more,"
Bonfils said.
As we have mentioned before in this space, the announcement
of discoveries of this kind are often loaded with enough weasel
words and qualifiers to impress the most ethically challenged
used car salesman. I was surprised the headline didn't read:
Earth-Like Planet Complete With Rocky Soil and
Liquid Water Found!*
* Void where prohibited. Licensed speculators only. Your
discovery may vary.
The driving assumption behind speculative stories like these
is pretty easy to spot. There is no Creator. Life on Earth
happened by chance. Since the rise of life isn't special, and it
happened here it must happen everywhere.
So is our planet "nothing special"?
The facts that we can observe argue in precisely the opposite
direction. Consider this stunning summary.
The Earth: Unique in All the Universe
by Jerry Bergman, Ph.D
The Scriptures declare that "God ...
formed the earth ... to be inhabited" (Isaiah 45:18). An
impartial study of the Earth soon convinces the student that
there is a tremendous amount of meaning behind this simple
statement.
The Earth
The Earth is the only planet circling our
sun on which life as we know it could (and does) exist. A
brief glance at the Earth and all other known planets finds
many startling contrasts. The Earth as a planet consists
mostly of iron, oxygen, sulfur, silicon, magnesium, and nickel
(total, 98%), with the other two percent consisting of about a
hundred other elements. Like no other planet, ours is covered
with green vegetation, blue-green seas, streams, rivers,
mountains, and deserts which produce a spectacular variety of
color and texture—all other known planets are covered with
lifeless soil which varies only according to slight movements
made by wind or mild air currents. Completely barren, the
surface of most planets is totally in contrast to the Earth's
with its blue lakes, green oceans, huge land masses and
500,000 islands. Even from a distance, its colors are quite
lively—bright greens, blues and whites—whereas the surface
of all other known planets are rather dull.
Some type of life is found in every niche
on the Earth. Even in the extremely cold Antarctica, hardy
microscopic beings exist in ponds, tiny wingless insects live
in patches of moss and lichen, and even two types of plants
flower yearly. From the top of the atmosphere to the bottom of
the oceans, from the coldest part of the poles to the warmest
part of the equator, life persists here. To this day no sign
of life has been found on any other planet.
The Earth is immense—8,000 miles in
diameter and weighing roughly 6. 6xl02l tons. If
the Earth traveled much faster in its 292-million-mile-long
orbit around the sun, centrifugal force would pull it away
from the sun, and if too far, all life would cease to exist.
If it traveled slightly slower, he Earth would move closer to
the sun, and if it moved too close, all life would likewise
perish. The Earth's 365 day, 5-hour, 48-minute and
45.51-second-round-trip is accurate to a thousandth of a
second! If the yearly average temperature on Earth rose or
fell only a few degrees, most life on it would soon roast or
freeze. This change would upset the water-ice and other
balances, with disastrous results. If it rotated on its axis
slower, all life would die in time, either by freezing at
night because of lack of heat from the sun, or by burning
during the day from too much sun.
The Sun
Of all the energy the sun gives off, only
one billionth of its daily output is picked up by the Earth.
The sun does provide the Earth with more than 130 trillion
horse power each day, about fifty thousand horse power for
each current resident. Even though there are likely several
hundred billion galaxies in the universe, there is only one
atom for every 88 gallons of space, which means most of the
universe (the vast majority, actually) is empty space!
If the Moon were much nearer to Earth, one
result would be huge tides which would overflow onto the
lowlands and erode the mountains (and with the continents
leveled, it is estimated that water would cover the entire
surface to the depth of a mile and a half)! If the Earth was
not tilted 23° on its axis, but was at a 90° angle in
reference to the sun, we would not have four seasons. Without
seasons, life would soon not be able to exist here—the poles
would lie in eternal twilight, and water vapor from the oceans
would be carried by the wind towards both the north and south,
and would freeze when close enough to the poles. In time, huge
continents of snow and ice would pile up in the polar regions,
leaving most of the Earth a dry desert. Eventually the oceans
would disappear and rainfall would cease. The accumulated
weight of ice at the poles would cause the equator to bulge
and, as a result, the rotation of the Earth would drastically
change.
The Miracle of Water
Another example which illustrates the
rigidity of environmental variations for life to exist is that
of water. The Earth is the only planet with huge bodies of
water—70% of its surface area consists of oceans, lakes, and
seas surrounding huge bodies of land. The few planets that
have water contain only moisture floating as vapor on their
surface, not large bodies of liquid water as on Earth.
Water is unique in that it absorbs large
amounts of heat without much alteration in its temperature.
Its absorption speed is extremely rapid—about ten times as
fast as steel. During the day, the seas rapidly soak up a
great deal of heat, thus the Earth stays fairly cool. At
night, the oceans release the vast amounts of heat that they
soaked up during the day, which combined with atmospheric
effects, keeps the surface from getting too cold at night. If
it were not for the tremendous amount of water on the Earth,
there would be far greater day and night temperature
variations. Many parts of the surface would be hot enough to
boil water in the day and the same part would be cold enough
to freeze water at night. Water is an excellent temperature
stabilizer. The large oceans on Earth are a vital part of our
survival!
The large amount of water on the Earth
could create problems, though. If something is heated, it
expands, and when cooled, contracts. Thus, given two objects
of the same size and material, if one is cooler, it will be
heavier. This may not seem like a problem, but in the case of
water, it would be, if it were not for a rare anomaly. Water,
as almost all other substances, contracts when cooled, but in
contrast to virtually all other materials (there are very few
exceptions, such as rubber and antimony), it contracts when
cooled only until it reaches 40 Centigrade then it, amazingly,
expands until it freezes. If water continued to contract when
cooled, it would become heavier and thus sink to the bottom of
the ocean. Further, when water turned to ice, it would
likewise sink to the bottom of the ocean. One result of this
is that the ocean bottom would be extremely cold—and many
fish would die. In time, more and more of the ocean would
become ice as more froze on the surface, sank, and accumulated
at the bottom.
Thus, for much of the Earth, the ice that
forms in seas, oceans, and lakes stays near the surface where
the sun and the warm water below melts it in the summer. Water
that is warmer than 4°, being heavier, sinks to the bottom
and warms the depth of the oceans. This process of surface
water warming and sinking to the bottom, plus the Coriolis
effect produces ocean currents. These currents, among other
things, insure that most of the ocean stays in a liquid form.
Indeed, "The Lord by wisdom hath founded the earth; by
understanding hath He established the heavens." Proverbs
3:19.
The Miracle of Air
On the land, the opposite happens. Air,
after it is warmed, rises—and the air close to the surface
of the Earth is heated via light energy from the sun. The air
near the surface then rises upward. The result is that the air
near the Earth's surface maintains a temperature in which life
can exist. If air acted the same way that water did, the
temperature on the Earth's surface would be unbearable—and
life could not survive for very long. The temperature a few
hundred feet above the surface, on the other hand, would be
quite cold and, likewise, life could also not exist there. The
only habitable region would be a thin slice of air, but even
here life could not exist for long. Plants and trees which
would be necessary to support the life in the atmosphere could
not survive as they would be in the cold zone. Thus birds
would have no resting place, or food, water or oxygen. But air
rises when heated and thus life can exist on the Earth.
The movement of warm air from the surface
rising upward creates air currents (wind) which are an
important part of the Earth's ecological system. They carry
away carbon dioxide from areas which overproduce, such as
cities, and move oxygen to areas in need of it, as large urban
population centers.
The mixture of gases usually found in the
atmosphere, without man's pollution, is perfect for life. If
it were much different (more oxygen, less carbon dioxide,
etc., or the atmospheric pressure was much lighter or
heavier), life would cease to exist on Earth.
If our atmosphere were thinner, many of the
millions of meteors which now are burned up would reach the
Earth's surface, causing death, destruction and fires
everywhere.
Adaptation to Environment or Creation of
Environment for Life?
If evolution works to evolve life to fit
the existing environments, why has it not equally conquered
all of the environments here and elsewhere? Earth is far
better suited for life than any other planet, yet most of the
environments even here, are either too hot or too cold, too
far underground or too far above ground to support much life.
In the several thousands of miles of changing environments
from the center of the Earth to the edge of its atmosphere,
there are only a few feet of habitable environment, and
therefore almost all creatures are forced to live there.
Although only the Earth was made to be inhabited (Isaiah
45:18) in our solar system, even on the Earth only a thin
slice is ideally suited for life.
This thin section, though, is teeming with
life. It is estimated that an acre of typical farm soil, six
inches deep, has several tons of living bacteria, almost a ton
of fungi, two hundred pounds of one-cell protozoan animals,
about one hundred pounds of yeast and the same amount of
algae.
Conclusion
The extremely fine line between an
environment where life can and cannot exist is illustrated by
the fact that it is estimated that a one-degree temperature
change in the average worldwide temperature would, in time,
seriously affect life on the Earth, and a two-degree
temperature change could be disastrous to life. The tolerances
are extremely small, and if there are any other planets in the
universe, it is unlikely that any of them could have life, due
to the extremely rigid conditions necessary for life to exist.
The chances of a planet being just the
right size, the proper distance away from the right star,
etc., are extremely minute, even if many stars have planets
circling them, as some speculate. The mathematical odds that
all of these and other essential conditions happened by chance
are astronomical—something like billions to one!
The more we search our universe, the more this place where we
live looks an awful lot better. In fact the more we examine the
place we live, the more we see that the Creator of Life has not
been subtle about His role in bringing about this perfect place
for life to flourish. This was no small feat. No wonder this
song is sung in Heaven itself!
“ You are worthy, O Lord,
To receive glory and honor
and power;
For You created all things,
And by Your will they exist
and were created." (Revelation 4:11)
Scott's Blog - 4/24/07
When Truth Is In Limbo
In the Scott's Blog Files under "So You Wanted to Be
a Pastor?" is one of the most heart wrenching
experiences one can go through or even observe from a distance -
the loss of a child.
There are few things more difficult than having a parent look
at you with grief stricken eyes and hear them ask, "Do you
think our baby is in Heaven?"
How do you answer a question like this?
In reality there are only two options - speculation or
revelation.
We can spot speculation by it's characteristic uncertainty,
it's reliance on human philosophy, and attempts to generate
answers by committee.
Consider a major course change on the issue of the spiritual
fate of children being considered by the Vatican.
Reuters
Photo: Pope Benedict XVI waves as he arrives to lead his
weekly general audience in Saint...
Pope approves report on teaching limbo
By NICOLE WINFIELD, Associated Press Writer Fri
Apr 20, 5:48 PM ET
VATICAN CITY-
Pope
Benedict XVI has reversed centuries of
traditional Roman Catholic teaching on limbo, approving a Vatican
report released Friday that says there were
"serious" grounds to hope that children who die
without being baptized can go to heaven.
Theologians said the move was highly significant —
both for what it says about Benedict's willingness to buck a
long-standing tenet of Catholic belief and for what it means
theologically about the Church's views on heaven, hell and
original sin — the sin that the faithful believe all
children are born with.
Although Catholics have long believed that children
who die without being baptized are with original sin and
thus excluded from heaven, the Church has no formal doctrine
on the matter. Theologians, however, have long taught that
such children enjoy an eternal state of perfect natural
happiness, a state commonly called limbo, but without being
in communion with God.
"If there's no limbo and we're not going to
revert to St. Augustine's teaching that unbaptized infants
go to hell, we're left with only one option, namely, that
everyone is born in the state of grace," said the Rev.
Richard McBrien, professor of theology at the University of
Notre Dame.
"Baptism does not exist to wipe away the
"stain" of original sin, but to initiate one into
the Church," he said in an e-mailed response.
Benedict approved the findings of the International
Theological Commission, a Vatican advisory panel, which said
it was reassessing traditional teaching on limbo in light of
"pressing" pastoral needs — primarily the
growing number of abortions and infants born to
non-believers who die without being baptized.
While the report does not carry the authority of a
papal encyclical or even the weight of a formal document
from the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith, it was approved by the pope on Jan. 19 and was
published on the Internet — an indication that it was
intended to be widely read by the faithful.
"We can say we have many reasons to hope that
there is salvation for these babies," the Rev. Luis
Ladaria, a Jesuit who is the commission's secretary-general,
told The Associated Press. He stressed that there was no
certainty, just hope.
The Commission posted its document Friday on Origins,
the documentary service of Catholic News Service, the news
agency of the American Bishop's Conference.
The document traces centuries of Church views on the
fate of unbaptized infants, paying particular attention to
the writings of St. Augustine — the 4th century bishop who
is particularly dear to Benedict. Augustine wrote that such
infants do go to hell, but they suffer only the
"mildest condemnation."
In the document, the commission said such views are
now out of date and there were "serious theological and
liturgical grounds for hope that unbaptized infants who die
will be saved and enjoy the beatific vision."
It stressed, however, that "these are reasons for
prayerful hope, rather than grounds for sure
knowledge."
No one can know for certain what becomes of unbaptized
babies since Scripture is largely silent on the matter, the
report said.
It stressed that none of its findings should be taken
as diminishing the need for parents to baptize infants.
"Rather ... they provide strong grounds for hope
that God will save infants when we have not been able to do
for them what we would have wished to do, namely, to baptize
them into the faith and life of the church."
Vatican watchers hailed the decision as both a
sensitive and significant move by Benedict.
"Parents who are mourning the death of their
child are no longer going to be burdened with the added
guilt of not having gotten their child baptized," said
the Rev. Thomas Reese, a senior fellow at the Woodstock
Theological Center at Georgetown University.
He said the document also had implications for
non-Christians, since it could be seen as suggesting that
non-baptized adults could go to heaven if they led a good
life.
"I think it shows that Benedict is trying to
balance his view of Jesus as being central as the savior of
the world ... but at the same time not saying what the
Evangelicals say, that anyone who doesn't accept Jesus is
going to hell," he said in a phone interview.
This seems to be a well intention attempt to answer a tough
issue that raises more questions than answers.
Consider just a few.
Although Catholics have long believed that children who
die without being baptized are with original sin and thus
excluded from heaven, the Church has no formal doctrine on the
matter. Theologians, however, have long taught that such
children enjoy an eternal state of perfect natural happiness, a
state commonly called limbo, but without being in communion with
God.
How can anyone enjoy perfect happiness (natural or otherwise)
without having a relationship with God? The Bible tells us,
Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and
comes down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no
variation or shadow of turning. (James 1:17)
I appreciate the attempt at kindness that lies behind this
doctrine, but without the One Who gives us every good and
perfect gift including even the capacity to experience
happiness, the hope for such things is just an illusion. As CS
Lewis once said, "God cannot give us a happiness and peace
apart from Himself because it does not exist. There is no such
thing."
The document traces centuries of Church views on the fate
of unbaptized infants, paying particular attention to the
writings of St. Augustine — the 4th century bishop who is
particularly dear to Benedict. Augustine wrote that such infants
do go to hell, but they suffer only the "mildest
condemnation."
The Bible does speak in clear and unmistakable terms
concerning Hell. Jesus called it "outer darkness"
and a place where there will be "weeping and gnashing of
teeth." (Matthew 8:12) Never is it called a place of "natural
happiness" or "mildest condemnation."
St. Augustine was certainly a brilliant man, but I would much
rather trust Jesus' view on such a crucial subject.
In the document, the commission said such views are now
out of date and there were "serious theological and
liturgical grounds for hope that unbaptized infants who die will
be saved and enjoy the beatific vision."
I am not sure what the day on the calendar has to do with
such an eternal truth, but it would seem that something as
important as the eternal destiny of children wouldn't be subject
to occasional "updates". In contrast we are told,
"Known to God from eternity are all His works."
(Acts 15:18)
The bottom line is this. The word "Limbo" is no
where to be found in the Bible. The concept arose when well
intentioned people attempted to resolve a deep spiritual
problem.
The problem inherent with speculation presents itself when
the simple question is asked, "Are you sure about
that?"
When we find ourselves dealing with the loss of a child,
speculation simply doesn't cut it.
At this point you may be asking another obvious question -
"So what do you say to people who have lost a
child?"
Me? I have no great wisdom or insights to share in that
situation. But we can rely on what God has to say on this issue
- that is revelation.
Although the Bible doesn't give us as much specific
information as we might like on this issue, it does tell us some
significant things that can point us on the pathway to peace.
First we are told that children are a high priority to
Jesus.
Then they brought little children to Him, that He might
touch them; but the disciples rebuked those who brought them.
But when Jesus saw it, He was greatly displeased and said
to them, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not
forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of God. Assuredly, I say
to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God as a little
child will by no means enter it." And He took them up in His
arms, laid His hands on them, and blessed them. (Mark
10:13-16)
Jesus loves children. All children. He cared about them here
on Earth. He cares about them in Heaven. He cares enough to be
personally involved with children.
Second, we are told that God does all things well, including
determining the eternal destiny of each and every human life.
Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right? (Genesis
18:25)
These two simple passages point to a profound truth. God is
the One Who holds each life, no matter what stage of life, in
His hands. He will do what is right and just and yet loving and
kind in every circumstance.
We can trust Him. Even in the death of a child.
That is where revelation ultimately leads - back to faith and
trust in the unchanging character of Jesus. We do ourselves no
favors by coming up with man centered speculative answers to try
to satisfy the mind, when God wants to deal with the heart.
In times when people are hurting in ways we can't fully begin
to understand, let's make it our business to lovingly and
compassionately point people back to the One who will not only
take perfect care of lost loved ones, but also makes this
promise to all who will trust Him.
And I heard a loud voice from heaven saying, “Behold,
the tabernacle of God is with men, and He will dwell with
them, and they shall be His people. God Himself will be with
them and be their God. And God will wipe away every tear
from their eyes; there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor
crying. There shall be no more pain, for the former things have
passed away.”
Then He who sat on the throne said, “Behold, I make all
things new.” And He said to me, “Write, for these words are
true and faithful.” (Revelation 21:3-5)
Scott's Blog - 4/23/07
The (Not So) Secret of a Growing Church
When you think about the state of Christianity in Europe,
what comes to mind? Perhaps a vision of majestic
cathedrals with thousands of people cleverly disguised as empty
seats?
Sadly, the staging grounds for some of the most amazing moves
of God's Spirit has turned into a bastion of secularism, a
spiritual vacuum that seems to be filled with an increasingly
radicalized form of Islam.
Or so it would seem. Until we take a closer look.
Evangelicals Thrive in England as Other
Churches Struggle
CAMBRIDGE, England (AP) - It's Sunday in England, and
across the country many traditional stone churches are
struggling to fill their pews.
But not C3, the Cambridge Community Church, one of the
country's many evangelical groups. Its mostly white,
middle-class congregants crowd a rented school auditorium with
their arms outstretched to the heavens and their hands fervently
clapping to evangelical sermons.
"I don't need an old church with stained glass
windows where a few people show up out of obligation, not
inspiration," said Ruth Chandler, a former member of the
Church of England.
In England's last census, 72 percent of people identified
themselves as Christian. Many are Anglicans affiliated with the
Church of England, which was created by royal proclamation
during the 16th century after King Henry VIII — who married
six times — broke ties with the Roman Catholic Church in a
dispute over divorce.
But the Church of England has said that less than 10
percent of its members are regular churchgoers. By contrast,
evangelicals make up about 40 percent of all the nation's
regular churchgoers, according to Peter Brierely, head of
Christian Research, a London-based think tank.
Among the thriving conservative Christian churches in
London are rich, mostly white Anglican congregations in the
evangelical wing of the denomination — including Holy Trinity
in Knightsbridge. Years ago, the parish developed an outreach
course for newcomers called Alpha, which explains the basics of
Christianity, that has been so successful it is now used for
evangelism worldwide.
Another is the independent Kingsway International
Christian Center, a predominantly black congregation. Its
rousing services often fill a 4,000-seat auditorium built inside
an old factory in a bleak industrial area. More evangelical
churches can be found across the country, from small rural
villages to university towns such as Cambridge.
Part of the evangelical growth is due to immigration.
Since 2001, Africa has supplied the single largest pool of
new British citizens. Nearly a third of the 160,000 immigrants
granted British citizenship in 2005 came from the continent,
according to official statistics. Many of the new arrivals bring
with them the spirit-filled Pentecostal worship style that has
drawn millions of Africans to Christian churches across the
continent in the last several decades.
Evangelical churches — both black and white — also
intensely evangelize in a way that other British Christians
don't.
What can we learn from this move of God in Britain?
The churches that are thriving are following a pattern set
forth by Jesus Himself. In His letter to the church at
Philadelphia, the Lord commended this fellowship for three
dominant characteristics.
“And to the angel of the church in Philadelphia write,
‘These things says He who is holy, He who is true, “He
who has the key of David,He who opens and no one shuts,
andshuts and no one opens”: “I know your
works. See, I have set before you an open door, and no one can
shut it; for you have a little strength, have kept My word, and
have not denied My name." (Revelation 3:7-8)
The churches that are thriving in Great Britain "have
a little strength" - that is, they place a great
emphasis on the presence and power of the Holy Spirit. When
people are looking for a church they aren't interested in great
traditions, or great reputations, as much as they are interested
in seeing the greatness of God's power to change lives.
The churches that are thriving in Great Britain "have
kept My (Jesus') word" - that is they lay great stress
on teaching God's Word in accessible and applicable ways. When
people are looking for a church they aren't interested in the
opinions or philosophies of men, as much as they are interested
in hearing what God has to say about their lives personally.
The churches that are thriving in Great Britain "have
not denied My (Jesus') name" - that is, they don't keep
faith in Christ to themselves, but boldly share the transforming
truth they have found in a relationship with Jesus with others.
When people are looking for a church they aren't interested in a
shaky faith that doesn't stand up under examination, as much as
they are interested in a faith that they can rely upon
personally and share with others practically.
It has been said that any church, like a chain, is only as
strong as its weakest link.
How are you doing individually?
Have you appropriated these spiritual (not so) secrets
of success in your own life? A Spirit lead, Scripturally guided,
Savior oriented believer is never going to have a faith that is
old, cold, dusty and dead!
Scott's Blog - 4/20/07
Is It Me, or Is It Getting Cold In Here?
One of the most personally challenging predictions of life in
the Last Days is given by Jesus in Matthew 24.
And because lawlessness will abound, the love of many will
grow cold. (Matthew 24:12)
I wonder if we have seen a vivid demonstration of just such
spiritual danger in the aftermath of the tragedy at Virginia
Tech?
It didn't take long for representatives of every
political persuasion under the sun to start weighing in on the
events. And as image after image showed the usual suspects doing
their level best to say "the right thing", a certain
emptiness seemed to follow in the wake.
Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan seems to have put
her finger on the phenomenon.
I wondered about the
emptiness of the phrases used by the media and by political
figures, and how pro forma and lifeless and cold they are. The
formalized language of loss hasn't kept up with the number of
tragedies. "A nation mourns." "Our prayers are
with you." The latter is both self-complimenting and of
dubious believability. Did you really pray? Or is it just a
phrase?
And
this as opposed to the honest things normal people say: "Oh
no." "I am so sorry." "I'm sad."
"It's horrible."
With all the therapy
in our great therapized nation, with all our devotion to
emotions and feelings, one senses we are becoming a colder
culture, and a colder country. We purport to be
compassionate--we must respect Mr. Cho's privacy rights and
personal autonomy--but of course it is cold not to have
protected others from him. It is cold not to have protected him
from himself.
I am haunted by the words, "Did you really pray? Or is
it just a phrase?"
We have all seen examples where saying, "Let me pray
about that" isn't something we really do, as much as it is
a way to politely distance ourselves from others or even from
something we really don't want to do.
We make eye contact with a person sitting in the pews who
looks emotionally over run. We've all experienced times when
simply saying, "I'll pray for you." allowed the
opportunity for a clean get away. Did we even remember to pray
for that hurting person as we moved on to other things?
A need is mentioned, perhaps having something to do with
changing a diaper or two in the nursery. "Oh, I'll
definitely pray about that.", becomes churchspeak for
"Are you kidding me? No way would I ever get near one of
those toxic bombs!"
When we fail to pray two things happen. First our integrity
takes a major hit. When the promise to pray becomes "the
right thing to say" with no reality behind it, we end up
fooling no one but ourselves. People have a funny way of being
able to discern who will really bring a matter before God, and
who won't. No wonder Jesus said,
"But let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your
‘No,’ ‘No.’ For whatever is more than these is from the
evil one."
When we fail to pray, a second thing happens. Our hearts grow
a bit colder. We find ourselves inching a bit closer to the
place Jesus warned of when He said,
‘ This people honors
Me withtheirlips, But their heart is far
from Me. And in vain they worship Me, Teachingasdoctrines
the commandments of men.' (Mark 7:6)
In our times there is no doubt that Jesus prediction is
coming to pass. Lawlessness is increasing, and with it the tidal
pull toward a cold and clichéd Christian life is rising as
well.
But we can turn the tide. Consider the legacy of one of the
people who lost their lives at Virginia Tech earlier this week.
Pastor on
Hampton victim: 'To know her was to love her'
Hampton's Lauren McCain is among
the dead in Blacksburg.
Her parents, David and Sherry
McCain, have not spoken to the media, but pastors at her
Peninsula church confirmed that the 20-year-old freshman died in
the rampage.
The family attends Restoration
Church-Phoebus Baptist in Hampton, where members began a vigil
Monday night after the McCains could not reach their daughter.
Four church young people attend the college; the others have
been reported safe.
"You meet a lot of young
people in your life," said Leonard Riley, the church's
former pastor, "but not a lot will make the impression that
Lauren did. To know her was to love her. She was always ready
and willing to do for someone else."
Last night Lauren's father did speak to Fox News Channel
anchorman Sheppard Smith. He told the correspondent that Lauren
was the kind of person who undoubtedly prayed for her killer
before she passed away. David McCain then something that left
Smith almost speechless.
"We forgive this poor young man for what he has done. We
are praying for his family."
And when David McCain said that, I immediately believed
it.
On her MySpace page, Lauren made it plain what was most
important to her.
"The purpose and love of my life
is Jesus Christ."
Lauren and her family have
demonstrated that love doesn't have to grow cold, even in the
valley of the shadow of death.
Scott's Blog - 4/19/07
Putting Out the Fire
As I write these words, there is a lock down in progress at
Corona Del Sol High School in Tempe, Arizona. A suspicious
package in a rest room has brought the school day to a grinding
halt. The bomb squad has arrived on scene.
It is not an isolated incident. Across the country over
twelve similar events have taken place. Bomb threats. Threats of
massacres. Students intercepted bringing guns on to school
grounds. Boasts of plans to take out 100 innocent lives.
What is going on?
Experts have their theories. Some believe that this is
coincidental, with the incidents having greater visibility due
to the tragic events at Virginia Tech earlier this week. Others
point out that the fact this is a week of grim anniversaries -
the Oklahoma City bombing, Columbine and Adolf Hitler's birthday
- as a motivating factor.
But could this explosion of menacing behavior have a direct
tie with what one commentator called "The Single Worst
Editorial Decision in The History of Broadcast News"?
Soon after the press conference at which
it was disclosed that NBC
had received a package of print, photos and video materials
from the Virginia Tech murderer, I interviewed Howard
Kurtz about how NBC should handle it. (The
transcript will be here later this evening.)
We quickly agreed that any video should not be shown, and
while I think that Howard thought perhaps a picture could be
aired, I and the live audience I was broadcasting in front of
disagreed. I would have published --instantly-- the text
of the killer's statement's for the public to read, but I
would have denied the killer the instant video glorification
he so obviously desired, an immortalization which other
deranged killers of the future will almost certainly seek to
emulate. NBC decided differently.
There is an old saying that behavior rewarded
equals behavior repeated. It appears that the deranged killers
are lining up to make NBC News and other willing mainstream
media outlets the new American Idol of maniacal manifestos.
The mainstream media news outlets will
obviously counter that withholding video material of a killer's
confessions runs counter to the mission of their departments to
satisfy the public's right to know.
But the consensus opinion of the murderer's
video is that it is a rambling, almost completely nonsensical
exercise in self indulgence. There is no key insight provided
that couldn't be summed up or paraphrased by a commentator.
There was no compelling reason to air the video apart from a
ratings coup.
It is hard not to suspect that the wave of
threats across the country by "copy cats" is fueled by
the chance to find the fame and platform for twisted ideas the
evil and unstable crave.
The question that must be asked of our media
outlets is simple. Just because you can air a video, should you
air a video?
What is true on a large scale is also true in
our individual lives. Maybe you have been made privy to a piece
of information concerning a co-worker, a neighbor, a fellow
church member or leader. Just because you can pass the info
along, should you?
Obviously, if that information could save
someone from danger or prevent a crime, we should share it. As a
pastor if I am made aware of a situation involving child abuse,
I am legally required to inform the authorities.
But what about that juicy piece of gossip?
What about a comment that can tear down a reputation? What about
those "true but unhelpful" things we can say about
others that really are none of our business?
Here's a good piece of personal editorial
policy from king Solomon.
He who conceals a transgression seeks love, But he who
repeats a matter separates intimate friends. (Proverbs 17:9)
We all make decisions everyday concerning the content we will
communicate to others. Perhaps if we make love the filter for
our comments we can be a source of light in a darkening world.
Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only
such a word as is good for edification according to the need of
the moment, so that it will give grace to those who hear.
(Ephesians 4:29)
UPDATE: Seems as if the media is now reconsidering the
decision to go with the video. One executive calls the repeated
airing "pornographic".
Backlash
Leads to Pullback on Cho Video
Apr
19 01:19 PM US/Eastern By
DAVID BAUDER
AP Television Writer
NEW
YORK (AP) - With a backlash developing against the
media for airing sickening pictures from Virginia
Tech shooter Cho Seung-Hui, Fox News Channel said
Thursday it would stop and other networks said
they would severely limit their use.
NBC
News was the recipient Wednesday of Cho's
package of rambling, hate-filled video and written
messages, with several pictures of him posing with
a gun. Contents began airing on "Nightly
News," and its rivals quickly used them,
too.
Family members of victims canceled plans to
appear on NBC's "Today" show Thursday
because they "were very upset" with the
network for showing the pictures,
"Today" host Meredith Vieira said.
Virginia State Police Col. Steve Flaherty—who
praised NBC Wednesday for coming to authorities
first with the package—said Thursday he was
disappointed with what the network showed.
"I just hate that a lot of people not used
to seeing that type of image had to see it,"
he said.
NBC said the material was aired because it
helped to answer the question of why Cho killed 32
people and himself on the Virginia
Tech campus Monday.
"The decision to run this video was
reached by virtually every news organization in
the world, as evidenced by coverage on television,
on Web sites and in newspapers," NBC said in
a statement. "We have covered this
story—and our unique role in it—with extreme
sensitivity, underscored by our devoted efforts to
remember and honor the victims and heroes of this
tragic incident."
NBC and its MSNBC cable outlet will
"severely limit" use of these pictures
going forward, "Today" host Matt Lauer
said, a restriction echoed by ABC
News. At both CBS News and CNN, producers will
need explicit approval from their bosses to use
them going forward.
Fox News announced on the air late Thursday
morning that it would no longer air Cho's
material, saying "sometimes you change your
mind."
These decisions, of course, came more than 12
hours after the pictures became available, after
they already made their impact. The news cycle
dictates they would be used less, anyway.
"It has value as breaking news," said
ABC News spokesman Jeffrey Schneider, "but
then becomes practically pornographic as it is
just repeated ad nauseam."
Jon Klein, president of CNN U.S., said the
decision to air it was a tough call.
"As breaking news, it's pertinent to our
understanding of why this was done," he said.
"Then, once the public has seen the material
and digested it, then it's fair to say, `How much
should we be showing it?' I think it's to the
credit of news organizations that they are dialing
back."
NBC News said it had no indication why Cho
chose it for his message. A Postal Service time
stamp shows it was mailed at 9:01 a.m. Monday,
during the two hours between his first shooting at
a Virginia Tech dorm and his massacre at a classroom
building.
The attention of our nation continues to be focused on the
horrible events that took place this week on the campus of
Virginia Tech University. The fact that one evil mad man
callously took the lives of 32 students has stirred up debate
and discussion on everything from gun control laws, the
legalities of committing unwilling people to psychiatric
facilities, to safety precautions on college campuses.
But in this time of national mourning, there was also in the
news a small glimmer of hope that the lives of those most
helpless among us may have received a measure of protection.
Supreme
Court OKs Abortion Procedure Ban
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court's conservative
majority handed anti-abortion forces a major victory Wednesday
in a decision that bans a controversial abortion procedure and
set the stage for further restrictions.
For the first time since the court established a woman's
right to an abortion in 1973, the justices upheld a nationwide
ban on a specific abortion method, labeled partial-birth
abortion by its opponents.
The 5-4 decision written by Justice Anthony Kennedy said
the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act that Congress passed and
President Bush signed into law in 2003 does not violate a
woman's constitutional right to an abortion.
The law is constitutional despite not containing an
exception that would allow the procedure if needed to preserve a
woman's health, Kennedy said. "The law need not give
abortion doctors unfettered choice in the course of their
medical practice," he wrote in the majority opinion.
Doctors who violate the law face up to two years in
federal prison.
Kennedy's opinion, joined by Bush's two appointees, Chief
Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, was a
long-awaited resounding win that abortion opponents expected
from the more conservative bench.
The administration defended the law as drawing a bright
line between abortion and infanticide.
Reacting to the ruling, Bush said that it affirms the
progress his administration has made to defend the
"sanctity of life."
"I am pleased that the Supreme Court has upheld a law
that prohibits the abhorrent procedure of partial birth
abortion," he said. "Today's decision affirms that the
Constitution does not stand in the way of the people's
representatives enacting laws reflecting the compassion and
humanity of America."
Some might take offense to the notion
that to be in favor of what proponents delicately call
"Intact Dilation and Extraction" is to be on the
opposite side of "compassion and humanity". But when
we take a look at what this procedure entails it is much more
difficult to hide behind a scientific euphemism.
Consider this description of the
procedure at issue taken from Judge Anthony Kennedy's majority
opinion.
" 'At this point, the right-handed surgeon
slides the fingers of the left [hand] along the back of the
fetus and "hooks" the shoulders of the fetus with
the index and ring fingers (palm down).
" 'While maintaining this tension, lifting the
cervix and applying traction to the shoulders with the fingers
of the left hand, the surgeon takes a pair of blunt curved
Metzenbaum scissors in the right hand. He carefully advances
the tip, curved down, along the spine and under his middle
finger until he feels it contact the base of the skull under
the tip of his middle finger.
" '[T]he surgeon then forces the scissors into
the base of the skull or into the foramen magnum. Having
safely entered the skull, he spreads the scissors to enlarge
the opening.
" 'The surgeon removes the scissors and
introduces a suction catheter into this hole and evacuates the
skull contents. With the catheter still in place, he applies
traction to the fetus, removing it completely from the
patient.' " H. R. Rep. No. 108-58, p. 3 (2003).
This is an abortion doctor's
clinical description. Here is another description from a nurse
who witnessed the same method performed on a 26-week fetus and
who testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee:
" 'Dr. Haskell
went in with forceps and grabbed the baby's legs and pulled
them down into the birth canal. Then he delivered the baby's
body and the arms--everything but the head. The doctor kept
the head right inside the uterus... .
" 'The baby's
little fingers were clasping and unclasping, and his little
feet were kicking. Then the doctor stuck the scissors in the
back of his head, and the baby's arms jerked out, like a
startle reaction, like a flinch, like a baby does when he
thinks he is going to fall.
" 'The doctor
opened up the scissors, stuck a high-powered suction tube into
the opening, and sucked the baby's brains out. Now the baby
went completely limp... .
" 'He cut the
umbilical cord and delivered the placenta. He threw the baby
in a pan, along with the placenta and the instruments he had
just used.' "
In my seminary studies in the Old Testament we were told of
the depravity involved in the worship of an idol called Molech.
Molech was a fertility god, fashioned in the form of an iron pot
bellied stove. It would be heated until the body and arms of the
idol were nearly white hot. A worshipper would then place a
living child on the searing arms of the idol as a sacrifice, as
a guarantee of further fertility and personal prosperity.
The prophet Jeremiah gave this heavenly perspective on this
awful practice.
They built the high places of Baal that are in the valley
of Ben-hinnom to cause their sons and their daughters to pass
through the fire to Molech, which I had not commanded them nor
had it entered My mind that they should do this abomination, to
cause Judah to sin. (Jeremiah 32:35)
God tells us that He found the level of depravity and hard
heartedness involved in Molech worship shocking.
I can't help but think "Intact Dilation and
Extraction" is seen by God in exactly the same way.
According to Planned Parenthood's Alan Gutmacher Institute there
were 2,200 victims of this procedure in 2000.
Law professor and talk show host Hugh Hewitt sums up the
decision in this way.
A victory for life, though not a sweeping or even a secure
one. And a decision that invites state legislatures to
take seriously their obligations to enact laws to protect the
unborn.Hugh Hewitt
Thank God that at least this line has been drawn in our
culture.
For the moment, anyway.
Scott's Blog - 4/17/07
Change a Mind, Change the World
When we hear people talking about ending the tragedy of
abortion, normally the conversation focuses in on voter
registration, promoting and supporting pro-life candidates, or
communicating with already elected officials that defending the
rights of the unborn is in their best interests
politically.
While these efforts certainly have their place, is it
possible that the best way to protect the unborn is by reaching
the hearts and minds of the already born?
As we have detailed in this space, the more science
progresses, the more we learn about the reality of pre-born
existence, the less the traditional argument that a fetus is
somehow not a human being makes sense.
And it appears that the hearts and minds of a new generation
of doctors is being effected. Consider this fascinating story
out of Great Britain.
More young doctors oppose abortions on ethical grounds
The NHS abortion service is heading for a crisis because
increasing numbers of doctors refuse to carry out terminations,
it was claimed. There has been a big rise in young medics with
'conscientious objections' to abortion. The increase has been
revealed by the Royal College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists. It says there is evidence of a 'slow but growing
problem' of young doctors opting out of abortion training on
moral grounds.
Some senior doctors have blamed declining interest on the
lack of 'glamour' involved in the work. This has been dubbed
'dinner party syndrome' where doctors don't want to admit to
their friends that they do abortions.
RCOG spokesman Kate Guthrie, who is head of abortion
services in Hull, said: "You get no thanks for performing
abortions, you get spat on. Who admits to friends at a dinner
party that they are an abortionist? It is not a sexy area - it
is a bog standard area of women's care.
"There is an increasing number of young doctors who
are not participating in the training. The college and the
Department of Health are really worried."
The reason that many young doctors are opting out of
performing abortions runs a bit deeper than a fear of embarrassment
at a cocktail party. Consider this comment made in response to
this article.
As a medical student, I have had to give the whole issue
of abortion much consideration. I have come to the conclusion
that it is very rarely justified, an opinion shared by many of
my fellow students, both religious and secular, male and female.
Accordingly, I do not intend to have any part in the industry
when I qualify. There is a clear dichotomy between a baby which
has been born, having as much right to life as you or I whilst
another, of EXACTLY the same development, can be terminated if
it is in the womb of a mother who rathers it was not.
Interestingly, the above article does not mention how much money
private abortion services make out of their trade. I dare say
that such businesses are more concerned about falling profits
that are likely to come about from any recruitment difficulties
than the availability of abortion services as they proclaim.
- James, Amersham, Buckinghamshire
There are reasons why the pro-abortion lobby desperately
fights against informed consent laws that require women to know
the state of development of the child they are preparing to
terminate. There are also reasons why crisis pregnancy centers
find that showing women an ultra sound of the baby has an
overwhelming impact on the decision to carry the child to term.
I am not suggesting that political activism has no place in
dealing with the all too prevalent problem of abortion on
demand, at any stage of development. But the more the truth of
what and who is at stake in this horrible process impacts
hearts, the less we may see women opting for it, or doctors
providing it.
There are few more vivid examples of this phenomenon than the
story of a young life named Samuel Alexander Armas.
The Picture of the Decade
Dr. James Dobson shares the remarkable story
— and meaning — behind a stunning photograph.
by James C. Dobson, Ph.D.
Dear Friends,
Take a good look at the stunning photograph
reproduced below. It was taken in the operating room
during delicate surgery on the spine of a baby boy who was
still in his mother’s uterus. His name is Samuel
Alexander Armas. I hope you will never forget his story.
This incredible photo was called to my attention by
a friend, Beth Fisher, who had come across it recently
while searching the Web. It was accompanied by an
anonymous commentary, written by someone who must have
been deeply affected by the picture. I took the liberty of
editing his or her statement for clarity and adding some
factual information found in other publications. I hope
you will read the following words with your head and with
your heart.
Samuel’s Story
"What you are witnessing should be designated
‘Picture of the Year,’ or, perhaps, ‘The Picture of
the Decade.’ It won’t be. Most people will never get
an opportunity to see it.
The photo depicts a 21-week-old pre-born baby, who
was being operated on by a surgeon named Joseph Bruner (It
is his finger in the photo). The baby had been diagnosed
with spina bifida, which leaves the spinal cord exposed
after it fails to develop properly. Unless the gap was
closed to protect his nervous system, serious brain damage
would likely have occurred before birth. There was no time
to lose. Unfortunately, the baby was too immature to
survive outside the womb, and corrective surgery had never
been performed on a baby this young. However, the parents,
Julie and Alex Armas, have a deep faith. She is an
obstetrics nurse in Atlanta, who had heard through the
Internet of Dr. Bruner’s work at Vanderbilt University
Medical Center in Nashville. He and his team pioneered
these delicate operations. Despite the fact that the
procedure has not yet been endorsed in medical journals,
the decision was made to attempt it on behalf of little
Samuel.
To operate on such a tiny baby required special
miniature instruments to be created. The sutures used, for
example, were less than the thickness of a human hair. A
Caesarean section was then performed to lift the uterus
gently from Julie’s body, permitting the surgeon to make
a small incision through which the operation would be
performed. Then, it happened! As Dr. Bruner was probing
the opening, the baby’s fully-developed hand wrapped
itself around the finger of the surgeon. The photograph
captures that amazing moment with perfect clarity.
This picture should be shown on every newscast and
run in every newspaper in America. Every teenager should
also see it. Why? Because it is an unmistakable reminder
that growing in the womb of each mother is a baby. It is
not a ‘blob of tissue,’ or a ‘product of
conception.’ A pre-born baby is fully human from the
moment of conception. What we see in the photograph
expresses that understanding better than a thousand words.
Little Samuel’s mother was quoted as saying she
and her husband ‘wept for days’ when they saw the
picture. She said, ‘This photo reminds us [that] my
pregnancy wasn’t about disability or illness. It was
about a little person.’
That’s what human pregnancy and birth are about
— a tiny human being with an eternal soul being formed
in the ‘image of God.’ And that’s what the media
elite fails to comprehend. That’s also why they don’t
want people to see the incredible picture of this precious
baby grasping the hand of his physician. I pray that it
will not be hidden forever."
I have to admit that I wept when I saw this
historic photograph and heard about the heroic effort to
rescue Samuel. I’m sure many of you are wondering how
this little guy is doing these days. Well, let’s let
his mother, Julie, bring us up to date on his condition.
She wrote the following letter recently to her friends
and well-wishers:
Samuel arrived on Thursday, Dec. 2, at 6:25 p.m.
at Northside Hospital, weighing 5 lbs, 11 ounces and
[measuring] 20 1/2 inches long. He was born at 36 weeks
but came into the world screaming his head off! He did
not have to spend any time in a neonatal unit and came
home with us on Monday, Dec. 6. After viewing an
ultrasound of his brain, Samuel’s neurosurgeon was
very optimistic, as he does not have any hydrocephalus
[excess fluid on the brain] and the brain malformation
has resolved. He is moving his legs very well from the
hips and some from the knees. He was frank breech
(folded in half) in the womb, and the orthopedist feels
that he has a good chance for walking. He will begin
physical therapy next week in order to work out some of
the stiffness in his legs that was a result of his being
folded in half in the womb. He is also nursing very
well.
Thank you for all your prayers and support. We are
happier than we ever dreamed possible!
Well, if you haven’t been touched by this
wonderful story, there’s something wrong with your
"feeler." The photograph alone, if witnessed by
people around the world, would force millions to rethink
the real meaning of abortion. Seeing that little hand
illustrates for us the fact that abortionists are, indeed,
killing babies — often by the most grotesque methods —
with the full protection and sanction of our government.
Shame on us, and shame on our leaders! If his parents had
wished, little Samuel could have been dismembered legally
without anesthetics by the procedure known as
"partial birth abortion." Indeed, his body parts
— including the delicate hand — could have been sold
to the highest bidder on the open market. If the United
States Supreme Court rules against babies in the Stenberg
v. Carhart case next summer, every legal effort to protect
them will be struck down. Please be in prayer about that
historic decision!
On other fronts, there is good news to report about
the effort to protect pre-born children. We are winning
the struggle for the hearts and minds of the people.
According to a Gallup poll, fully 71 percent of Americans
now want greater restrictions on abortion.2
That represents considerable movement toward life since
the pro-abortion forces began telling everyone that unborn
babies were "meaningless protoplasm." Despite
this terrible lie, more and more people are coming to
understand that human life is precious at all ages —
from conception to the grave.
What will be the end result of the debate that rages
today? It will not depend on Congress, the Supreme Court
or a presidential decree. History tells us that turning
points of this nature depend primarily on the perseverance
of those involved. Remember that George Washington led his
armies into battle nine times against the British and was
mauled in six of them. Why, then, did his forces win the
Revolutionary War? It was because the British people
became fatigued by the war, while the Americans became
more resolute. When it comes down to it, powerful ideas
cannot be suppressed forever by guns, bullets and court
decisions. Their viability depends on the determination of
the people who support them. Even though we have lost many
major battles in the struggle to save pre-born children,
and 39 million have died, I still believe we will be
victorious someday.3
Why? Because ours is a righteous cause. The only way we
can lose is to disengage from the battle. The Apostle Paul
wrote, "Let us not become weary in doing good, for at
the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give
up" (Galatians 6:9 NIV). With prayer and
perseverance, we (or perhaps our children) will live to
see babies such as Samuel Alexander Armas protected and
welcomed into a world of love and acceptance.
Lord God in heaven, hasten the arrival of that day!
"The Worst Single Shooting Incident in American
History"
"Horrifying"
This single word best describes the events that took place
this morning on the campus of Virginia Tech University.
BLACKSBURG, Va. - A gunman opened fire in a dorm and
classroom at Virginia Tech on Monday, killing at least 30 people
in the deadliest shooting rampage in U.S. history, government
officials told The Associated Press. The gunman was killed,
bringing to death toll to 31, but it was unclear if he was shot
by police or took his own life.
"Today the university was struck with a tragedy that
we consider of monumental proportions," said Virginia Tech
president Charles Steger. "The university is shocked and
indeed horrified."
The name of the gunman was not immediately released, and
investigators offered no motive for the attack. It was not
immediately known if the gunman was a student.
FBI
spokesman Richard Kolko in Washington said there was no
immediate evidence to suggest it was a terrorist attack,
"but all avenues will be explored."
There is no word as to the identity or the motive of the
murderer. Along with 32 who lost their lives, over twenty others
were wounded.
And while we won't know all the details and answers as to the
specifics of this tragedy, we can anticipate a question that
will rise in the aftermath.
It was the same question that was asked almost eight years
ago at Columbine High School.
Why does God allow such things to happen?
I believe we can get some heavenly perspective on this issue
from one of the most famous passages we find in the Old
Testament.
I call heaven and earth as witnesses today against you, that
I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing;
therefore choose life, that both you and your descendants may
live; that you may love the LORD your God, that you may obey His
voice, and that you may cling to Him, for He is your life
and the length of your days (Deuteronomy 30:19-20)
Here we see three key Biblical truths that come to the
forefront in circumstances like these.
God has given to each and every human being the ability to
choose. We can walk with God or to set our own agenda. We can
choose to relate to our Creator, or rebel against Him. The free
choice that can be used to cause one person to reach out in
compassion is the same capacity that allows another to give way
to rage and destruction.
The choices we face in life lead in one of two directions -
either to life or death. James Russell Lowell once commented
"Millions of self centered, rather than God centered acts
may be rightfully understood to be destroying the world."
When disasters like this take place some will shake their fists
at heaven and blame God. But in reality that this is escapism.
The same fallen nature that dwelt in the murderer at Virginia
Tech dwells in each of us as well. We are what's wrong with this
world.
In spite of our sad and destructive track record as a human
race, God still chooses to love us. In fact He loves us so much
He became a man and walked among us in the person of Jesus
Christ. He endured the absolute worst that human nature could
inflict, His death on the cross. He did this so that fallen,
sinful people like us could be forgiven and restored to a living
relationship with our Creator.
Horrible manifestations of the fallen ness of humanity almost
instinctively cause us to ask the question, "Why?" But
when Jesus was asked about a similarly brutal set of
circumstances, He steered our focus in a very different
direction.
There were present at that season some who told Him about
the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their
sacrifices. And Jesus answered and said to them, “Do you
suppose that these Galileans were worse sinners than all other
Galileans, because they suffered such things? I tell you,
no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish. Or
those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them,
do you think that they were worse sinners than all other
men who dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, no; but unless you
repent you will all likewise perish." (Luke 13:1-5)
Jesus' advice? Repent. The word means to take a step back and
re-evaluate where we stand with God. When we choose to receive
His life, and relate His life to others, we can become part of
the solution, not part of the problem in this world.
Please remember to pray for the survivors and grieving
families that face the monumental challenge of carrying on after
this kind of tragedy.
Scott's Blog - 4/13/07
But Does A T-Rex Taste Like Chicken?
In the Scott's Blog Files under "Precarious
Presuppositions" comes this latest attempt to avoid the
obvious.
Does this look like a T. rex?
OK, no, but find indicates they're evolutionary kin
WASHINGTON — Did the most famous predator of the
dinosaur era evolve into something on Colonel Sanders' menu?
Could be, say scientists who matched proteins from a
Tyrannosaurus rex with those in modern-day poultry.
The proteins are the oldest such material ever found, and
the analysis of them, once thought impossible, adds new weight
to the idea that today's birds are descendants of the mighty
dinosaurs.
"The door just opens up to a whole avenue of
research that involves anything extinct," said
Matthew T. Carrano, curator of dinosaurs at the
Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History.
While dinosaur bones have long been studied, "It's
always been assumed that preservation does not extend to
the cellular or molecular level," said Mary Higby
Schweitzer of North Carolina State University.
It had been thought that some proteins could last a
million years or more, but not to the age of the
dinosaurs, she said.
So when she was able to recover soft tissue from a
T. rex bone found in Montana in 2003, she was surprised,
Schweitzer said.
And now, researchers led by John M. Asara of Beth
Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston have been able
to analyze proteins from that bone.
The genetic code that directs the development of living
things is the DNA, but that is more fragile, and they
didn't find that.
"But proteins are coded from the DNA. They're
kind of like first cousins," Schweitzer said.
What Asara's team found was collagen, a type of fibrous
connective tissue that is a major component of bone. And
the closest match in creatures alive today was collagen
from chicken bones.
Schweitzer and Asara report their findings in today's
issue of the journal Science.
"Most people believe that birds evolved from
dinosaurs, but that's all based on the architecture of the
bones," said Asara. "This allows you to get the
chance to say, 'Wait, they really are related because
their sequences are related.' We didn't get enough
sequences to definitively say that, but what sequences we
got support that idea."
"The fact that we are getting proteins is very,
very exciting," said John Horner of Montana State
University and the Museum of the Rockies.
And, he added, it "changes the idea that birds and
dinosaurs are related from a hypothesis to a theory."
To scientists, that's a big deal.
In science, a hypothesis is an idea about something
that seems probable, while a theory has been tested and is
supported by evidence. Previously, the bird-dinosaur
relationship was based on similarities in the shape of
bones; now there is solid evidence of a relationship at
the molecular level.
Horner, who found the bones studied by Schweitzer and
Asara, said this is going to change the way
paleontologists go about collecting specimens — they
will now be looking for the best-preserved items, often
buried in sand or sandstone sediments.
Does anything strike you as odd or off about this report?
First of all, the ultimate "elephant in the living
room" is the idea that soft tissue (i.e.- dinosaur meat)
could be preserved in an allegedly 65 million year old bone. How
does that happen? We aren't told. It just does. Trust us, we are
scientists.
It would seem to be logical to conclude that the
discovery of such tissue might cause an open minded individual
to question whether the assumed vast age of the T-Rex is really
accurate. I remember discovering a hoagie sandwich that my
brother stashed under my bunk in college. After six weeks it
looked fossilized. Could you imagine what 65 million years would
have done to that taste treat?
How was such tissue preserved? Why isn't such an obvious
question raised? Because if the T-Rex turns out to be thousands,
instead of millions of years old we are getting treacherously
close to - Gasp! - a biblical view of not only the dinosaurs,
but the rest of creation.
Second, does the similarity of some aspects of bone
structure, along with some aspects of DNA indicate a common
ancestor - or a common Designer? Common sense looks at a chicken
and a T-Rex and concludes that the idea that the big one with
the teeth begat the little feathered one with the beak is how
shall we say, a stretch. It would make far more sense to
conclude a common Designer of both the T-Rex and the chicken
might use similar structural approaches in both.
Once again we see that our preconceived ideas have a funny
way of reappearing again in our conclusions. In short, whether
we work with test tubes or in telemarketing, we all are biased.
The question is, which bias holds up under examination?
There is no wisdom and no understanding And no counsel
against the LORD. (Proverbs 21:30)
Scott's Blog - 4/12/07
Figures Don't Lie?
A few years ago a church in Southern California decided to
make a dramatic break from the usual Easter Sunday services. The
people gathered for the morning service were greeted by an empty
stage where the praise band would usually be. The service failed
to start at the announced time. After 10 minutes or so had
passed , a janitor walked out and said to the crowd, "What
are you all doing here? Didn't you hear? They found Jesus' body.
Christianity is a hoax. You might as well go home."
The janitor left, and so did a good share of the people. Then
the pastor came out on stage and said, "Wait! Jesus really
is risen. We just wanted to make the point that this is where
our faith stands or falls!"
By all reports, the members, the people who left, as well as
the board of elders were less than amused.
I was reminded of this exercise in bad judgment when I read
the latest post mortem on a similarly failed dramatic
presentation called "The Lost Tomb of Jesus."
A tomb bearing the engraving 'Mariam'.
Could this be the original tomb of Mary, mother of Jesus?
Photo: Courtesy
Several prominent scholars who were interviewed in a
bitterly contested documentary that suggests that Jesus and his
family members were buried in a nondescript ancient Jerusalem
burial cave have now revised their conclusions, including the
statistician who claimed that the odds were 600:1 in favor of
the tomb being the family burial cave of Jesus of Nazareth, a
new study on the fallout from the popular documentary shows.
The dramatic clarifications, compiled by epigrapher
Stephen Pfann of the University of the Holy Land in Jerusalem in
a paper titled "Cracks in the Foundation: How the Lost Tomb
of Jesus story is losing its scholarly support," come two
months after the screening of The Lost Tomb of Christ that
attracted widespread public interest, despite the concomitant
scholarly ridicule.
The film, made by Oscar-winning director James Cameron and
Emmy-winning Canadian filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici, prompted
major criticism from both a leading Israeli archeologist
involved in the original dig at the site as well as Christian
leaders, who were angered over the documentary's contradictions
of main tenets of Christianity.
But now, even some of the scholars who were interviewed
for and appeared in the film are questioning some of its basic
claims.
The most startling change of opinion featured in the
16-page paper is that of University of Toronto statistician
Professor Andrey Feuerverger, who stated those 600 to one odds
in the film. Feuerverger now says that these referred to the
probability of a cluster of such names appearing together.
Pfann's paper reported that a statement on the Discovery
Channel's Web site, which previously read "a statistical
study commissioned by the broadcasters...concludes that the
probability factor is 600 to 1 in favor of this being the tomb
of Jesus of Nazareth and his family," in keeping with
Feuerverger's statement, has been altered and now reads, "a
statistical study commissioned by the broadcasters... concludes
that the probability factor is in the order of 600 to 1 that an
equally 'surprising' cluster of names would arise purely by
chance under given assumptions."
Another sentence on the same Web site stating that
Feuerverger had concluded it was highly probable that the tomb,
located in the southeastern residential Jerusalem neighborhood
of Talpiot, was the Jesus family tomb - the central point of the
film - has also been changed. It now reads: "It is unlikely
that an equally surprising cluster of names would have arisen by
chance under purely random sampling."
Israeli archeologists have said that the similarity of the
names found inscribed on the ossuaries in the cave to the
members of Jesus's family was coincidental, since many of those
names were commonplace in the first century CE.
The difference between the first claim - "Yep! We've
definitely found the bone box of Jesus!" and "Hmmm..Kinda
interesting that those names are all there in that tomb..Oh,
never mind." is pretty significant.
The difference? Bias. If one goes into a
"documentary" bent on proving what they really have
always wanted to be the case, well placed skepticism and a sense
of objectivity goes out the window. Not unlike the famous
"Fake, but accurate!" defense we have heard in the
media, this documentary has been shown to have more holes in it
than the Titanic itself.
The lesson to be learned? The old saying is true -
"Figures don't lie, but liars figure." Throw in some
state of the art special effects, direct a tear jerking
dramatization or two, plus some grave intonations by a
professorial type with a thick accent and anything seems
plausible.
The wise person will realize that the Good News that Jesus
rose from the dead in a moment of history is an anvil that has
worn out many hammers. The failed attempts of pseudo scholarship
to disprove the resurrection may generate initial debate and
discussion, but God's truth stands.
Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now
commands all men everywhere to repent, because He has appointed
a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the
Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all
by raising Him from the dead." (Acts 17:30-31)
Scott's Blog - 4/11/07
Don't Confuse Me With the Facts, My Poll Numbers..err..I
Mean, My Mind Is Made Up!
Every once in a while there is a day in the news cycle where
stories will break that seem, well, ironically well timed. This
week two developments splashed across the headlines that created
a unique opportunity for a check up on the health of the
national conscience.
The first -
WASHINGTON -- The Senate voted overwhelmingly to reject
restrictions President Bush has placed on embryonic stem-cell
research. Bush plans to veto the bill, but his restrictions are
unlikely to last for long after his presidency.
The candidates running to succeed Bush largely endorse
federally supported stem-cell research. That support, coupled
with the backing of a majority of Americans, means change is
almost certain.
"The war is basically won, the policy is going to be
updated, it's just a matter of when,'' said Lawrence Soler, a
vice president at the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, which
lobbies for embryonic stem-cell research, on Wednesday.
Bush has cast stem-cell research as a moral issue
intimately connected to the question of when life begins, a
question that echoed throughout the second day of Senate debate.
Bush used the only veto of his career to overturn a similar bill
last year.
"I believe this will encourage taxpayer money to be
spent on the destruction or endangerment of living human
embryos,'' Bush said in a statement.
By Karen Kaplan, Los Angeles Times
| April 11, 2007
LOS ANGELES -- Researchers have demonstrated for the
first time that the progression of Type-1 diabetes can be
halted -- and possibly reversed -- by a stem cell transplant
that preserves the body's diminishing ability to make
insulin, according to a study published today.
The experimental therapy eliminated the need for
insulin injections for months or even years in 14 of 15
patients who were recently diagnosed with the disease. One
subject, a 30-year-old male, hasn't taken insulin since his
stem cell transplant more than three years ago, according to
the study in the Journal of the American Medical
Association.
The study suggests a new avenue for treating the
intractable disease, in which the immune system destroys
insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. Without
insulin, patients can't metabolize sugar and risk developing
nerve damage, cardiovascular disease, kidney failure, and
blindness.
Wow! A cure for diabetes? That certainly bolsters the
case for the passage of the Senate bill!
Or does it?
We have to read through almost three quarters of the
Times account of this break through before we are informed
of a critical piece of information. Where did these stem
cells come from?
The patients, who ranged in age from 14 to 31, were
treated with drugs and hormones that prompted the body to
produce hematopoietic stem cells and send them from the bone
marrow into the bloodstream, where they were extracted by a
special machine.
About two weeks later, the patients checked into the
hospital and received chemotherapy and other drugs to kill
off their immune systems over five days.
After a day of rest, they were infused with their
own hematopoietic stem cells, which took about eight to
12 days to establish a new immune system.
As we have detailed before in this space, certain types of
stem cells are still able to be harvested from our bodies long
after we pass the embryonic stage of our development. Research
in the field of adult stem cell therapies has produced well over
70 documented practical breakthroughs like the results in
Brazil.
Embryonic stem cell research has produced exactly zero
therapies or cures.
(For more information see http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1845/#summary)
So why are we marching headlong into an ethical tar
pit, where beings that are just as genetically human as
you or me can be killed for the possible benefit of those who
are fortunate enough to have a few more years of time and
nurture under their belts?
As Dr. Jonathon Sarfati sums up -
In some ways, the controversy is unnecessary because of
well-known science deliberately overlooked in many circles —
the great potential of adult (i.e. non-embryonic) stem cell
research. But in another sense, the controversy shows a
terrifying malaise in Western society not seen since Germany in
the 1920s–40s.Stem cells and Genesis - Journal of Creation
(TJ)
As Christians we should whole heartedly support the advance
of scientific research that can alleviate suffering in this
world. But we must be careful when an ends justifies the means
mentality threatens to stampede us over a line the Bible says we
dare not cross. God is the Author of every life. Every life, no
matter what the stage of development is valuable in His eyes.
If any society may be judged based on how it treated the most
helpless, how will we fare if we fail to stand for the lives of
human beings at their most vulnerable?
Deliver those who are drawn toward death,
And hold back those
stumbling to the slaughter.
If you say, “Surely
we did not know this,”
Does not He who weighs the
hearts consider it?
He who keeps your soul, does
He not know it?
And will He not
render to each man according to his deeds. (Proverbs
24:11-12)
For a mind blowing view of the miracle of human development
check out the link below.
The latest media fire storm to blaze
across our TV screens involves the acerbic early morning radio
host Don Imus.
Imus started the
firestorm after the Rutgers team, which includes eight black
women, lost the NCAA women's championship game to Tennessee. He
was speaking with producer Bernard McGuirk on the air when he
said "that's some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they got
tattoos ..."Rutgers Team, Coach Lash Out at Imus
And believe me, it went
down hill - waaaaay down hill - from there. I won't
dignify the comments that were made by repeating them in this
space. But they were below the belt morally, and straight out of
the Ku Klux Klan phrase book racially.
Things only got worse
when the Rutgers players were given the opportunity to speak for
themselves. They simply didn't fit this exercise in
drive by character assassination.
PISCATAWAY, N.J. (AP) -
Rutgers women's basketball coach on Tuesday called the comments
radio host Don Imus made about her team "racist and sexist
remarks that are deplorable, despicable and
unconscionable."
"These young ladies before you are valedictorians,
future doctors, musical prodigies," coach C. Vivian
Stringer told a nationally publicized news conference a day
after the uproar over Imus' comments led to a two-week
suspension of his show.
Team member Essence Carson said she and the other players
were angry and disgusted but would meet with Imus.
So how do you recover from such an inexcusable exercise in
poor judgment?
It appears that taking a shot gun approach to making
apologies isn't cutting it.
The "Today" show's Al Roker said Tuesday on his
show's official blog that it was time for Imus to go. "I,
for one, am really tired of the diatribes, the 'humor' at
others' expense, the cruelty that passes for 'funny,'"
Roker said.Rutgers Team, Coach Lash Out at Imus
What to do when people have been genuinely hurt by our words
or deeds? Perhaps a lot of hurt and controversy could be avoided
if the words of Jesus were taken seriously.
“Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell
him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you
have gained your brother."(Matthew 18:15)
Notice, Jesus didn't say "Go on a series of talk shows.
If that doesn't work, check into rehab!"
Jesus' advice is simple. If we've hurt someone - go to the
person who was hurt. Go directly to the person who was hurt. Do
not pass "Go". Do not collect $200 dollars.
Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there
remember that your brother has something against you, leave your
gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be
reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.
(Matthew 5:23-24)
To their credit, the Rutgers basketball team is willing to
allow just such a meeting to take place. Hopefully a sincere
apology will be offered and accepted. Rising above the hurt and
offering forgiveness in a situation like this is the best
revenge.
But when this happens after a round on the talk show circuit,
the apology seems a bit forced, and more like something that
comes from a public relations damage control team, than an
appeal from a sincerely sorry heart.
Perhaps the next time we find our words doing some damage, we
can follow Jesus' instructions and see the amazing power to heal
the deepest hurts humility and grace can provide.
"As far back as I can remember, I drew funny pictures
which got me in or out of trouble depending on the circumstances."
I was genuinely saddened to hear of the passing of Johnny
Hart, the creator of the classic comic strip "BC". I
have to admit I have always been a fan of the comics section of
the newspaper. And one of the first comics that got me hooked
was "BC".
But as the years rolled on I began to notice a change in the
strip. First, a reference or two that seemed, well, biblical.
Then a comic that seemed designed not only to make us laugh, but
to think about our relationship with God.
Finally, things progressed to the point where "BC"
seemed to have become something unexpected - a platform for
evangelism.
As you can imagine, this kind of comic strip can generate
complaints and cancellations by newspapers. Johnny Hart didn't
seem to care. He continued to generate funny gags on general
subjects. But he also boldly proclaimed what was most important
to him personally, His relationship with Jesus - and not without
catching some flack in the process.
A strip published on Easter in 2001 drew protests from
Jewish groups and led several newspapers to drop the strip. The
cartoon depicted a menorah transforming into a cross, with
accompanying text quoting some of Jesus Christ's dying words.
Critics said it implied that Christianity supersedes Judaism.
Hart said he intended the strip as a tribute to both
faiths.
What to say about the legacy of Johnny Hart? He has been
lauded by his colleagues and friends as a cartoonist
extraordinaire - a pro's pro in his business. But it was also
his excellence as an artist that gave him the platform to share
his faith. It must have taken a lot of courage to risk a life's
work to present the Good News in a place where most comics have
become snarling exercises in sarcasm, atheism and
dysfunction.
Perhaps this is a life lesson we can all learn from. In many
ways Johnny Hart was an awful lot like Daniel.
Now at the end of the days, when the king had said that
they should be brought in, the chief of the eunuchs brought them
in before Nebuchadnezzar. Then the king interviewed them, and
among them all none was found like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael,
and Azariah; therefore they served before the king. And in all
matters of wisdom and understanding about which the king
examined them, he found them ten times better than all the
magicians and astrologers who were in all his
realm. Thus Daniel continued until the first year of King Cyrus.
(Daniel 1:18-21)
Most of us as Christians would love nothing more than to be
used by God in a profound way in our work place. Perhaps the
best way to make an impact is to not only share with our words,
but also by the standard of our work. Daniel was so excellent in
what he did on the job, even pagan kings knew it wasn't in their
best interest to get rid of him. Johnny Hart was so excellent in
what he did on the job, that even secularist editors knew it
wasn't in their interest to cancel his strip.
Johnny Hart died from a stroke last weekend. His wife found
him at his drawing board.
Ironically enough, the abbreviation "BC" stands for
the words "Before Christ".
That is precisely where Johnny Hart finds himself right
now.
Well done, Johnny. Your good deeds follow you to heaven.
Scott's Blog- 4/06/07
Bad Things and Good Friday?
One of the most challenging questions a Christian can face
goes something like this - "If God is good and all
powerful, why does He allow innocent people to suffer? If He is
good, He would care when bad things happen. If He is all
powerful He would do something about it. So does God not care,
or is He just incapable of making a difference when it really
matters?"
Tough questions? You bet.
Is there a biblical answer we can share when asked, "Why
do bad things happen to good people?"
You may find this surprising, but not only is there a solid
and potentially life changing answer to this question, but the
Bible provides the only answer that makes sense without leading
either to indifference or despair.
Where Are The Good People?
If we are going to make sense of the suffering we see in this
world, we need to go back to our roots. The Bible tells us a
remarkable thing in the book of Genesis. Following the six days
of creation, God gave this simple, yet profound assessment on
the state of things.
Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it
was very good. (Genesis 1:31)
The Hebrew words translated "very good" are
emphatic. There was no fault or flaw in the entire creation.
There was no death, sorrow, pain, disease or natural disasters.
There was perfect, uninterrupted fellowship between God and
man.
But God created us to enjoy a love relationship with Himself.
And love that is not freely given by an act of the will isn't
real love. So our ancestors Adam and Eve were given a choice -
the one commandment they were to keep as a sign of this love
relationship.
Then the LORD God took the man and put him in the garden
of Eden to tend and keep it. And the LORD God commanded the man,
saying, “Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but
of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat,
for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die."
(Genesis 2:15-17)
The Hebrew here is also instructive. The words "you
shall surely die" are more accurately translated "dying,
you shall die". The consequences for breaking
relationship with God, the Author of life were both physical and
spiritual.
And the rest, as they say, is history. Adam and Eve exercised
their free will and told God they could get along fine without
Him. And God honored their request. He took a step back. And
into the void flowed death. From that time onward, our race was
spiritually separated from our Creator. the personal impact is
not hard to spot. In the book of Romans, the Apostle Paul
delivers heaven's verdict on the true condition of human nature.
“ There is none righteous, no, not one; There is none who
understands; There is none who seeks
after God. They have all turned
aside; They have together become
unprofitable; There is none who does
good, no, not one.” “ Theirthroatisan opentomb; With their tongues they
have practiced deceit”;
“ The poison of aspsisunder their lips”; “ Whose mouthisfull of cursing and bitterness.” “ Theirfeetareswift to shed blood; Destruction and miseryarein their ways; And the way of peace
they have not known.” “ There is no fear of
God before their eyes." (Romans 3:10-18)
Most telling in this description is the word
"unprofitable". In the original language it was used
to describe food that had gone rancid, like sour milk.
Have you ever noticed that when we are around something that
smells, we can get used to it after awhile? The same thing is
true with human nature. Deep down inside we know we aren't the
people we should be, but because we tend to compare our moral
fragrance with other cups of sour milk, we can think, "Hey!
I'm not as smelly as some other people. In fact I think I'm
pretty good."
God sees us differently. The first problem with the question,
"Why do bad things happen to good people?" is that
truth be told, there are no good people.
For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of
God. (Romans 3:23)
What About "Bad Things"?
Most people can understand that God is not to blame when a
human being makes a bad choice. God doesn't order people to
commit crimes, drive drunk or be abusive and selfish in
relationships. But what about what insurance companies call
"Acts of God"? Famines, and tsunamis? Plagues and
pestilences?
Remember how God warned Adam and Eve that if they violated
His one command "dying, you shall die"? When humanity
fell, the damage wasn't just moral and spiritual in nature. It
effected the whole Creation. The universe, which at one time was
"very good", suddenly felt the impact of the presence
of death, decay and destruction.
For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly,
but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the
creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of
corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For
we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth
pangs together until now. (Romans 8:20-22)
The fact is, we live in a world that daily feels the effects
of the fall. Yet, even in this fallen state we still see signs
and glimpses of the glory of when things were "very
good". This is where things can get confusing. But our
situation comes into focus when we realize, in the words of
Christian writer CS Lewis "This world is as close as a
sinner will ever get to heaven, and as close as a saint will
ever get to hell."
What About the "What About"?
So the Bible gives us an answer to our question that gets a
little more personal than perhaps we would like. What's wrong
with the world? We are what's wrong. Our sin has caused us to be
in this confusing crisis we call life.
So where is God in all this?
Some have said God is too great to care about insignificant
people like us. Others have said God would like to do something
about our suffering but lacks the power to do so. Others believe
that He is continually angry and we can only avoid His wrath by
engaging in an endless list of rituals and routines. Others
believe that no one can know what He thinks, and so the best
course of action is to duck and cover and hope for the best.
But the Bible provides a strikingly different answer.
God, for His part, would have been totally justified in
walking away from us. But His infinite love continues to reach
out to us. His infinite justice demands that our wrongs be dealt
with. So God got directly involved.
He walked among us in the Person of Jesus Christ.
He experienced all of the heartache, sorrow and consequences
of living in the same world we live in.
He lived a perfect life - and then, was willing to die for
us, to take the penalty your sins and my sins so richly deserve.
700 years before the birth of Jesus, God gave the prophet
Isaiah a mind blowing glimpse of the most important act of love
this world has ever known.
Who has believed our report?
And to whom has the arm of
the LORD been revealed?
For He shall grow up
before Him as a tender plant,
And as a root out of dry
ground.
He has no form or
comeliness;
And when we see Him, There is no beauty
that we should desire Him.
He is despised and
rejected by men,
A Man of sorrows and
acquainted with grief.
And we hid, as it were, our
faces from Him;
He was despised, and we did
not esteem Him.
Surely He has borne
our griefs
And carried our sorrows;
Yet we esteemed Him
stricken,
Smitten by God, and
afflicted.
But He was
wounded for our transgressions, He was bruised for
our iniquities;
The chastisement for our
peace was upon Him,
And by His stripes we are
healed.
All we like sheep
have gone astray;
We have turned, every one,
to his own way;
And the LORD has laid on Him
the iniquity of us all.
He was oppressed and
He was afflicted,
Yet He opened not His mouth;
He was led as a lamb to the
slaughter,
And as a sheep before its
shearers is silent,
So He opened not His mouth.
He was taken from
prison and from judgment,
And who will declare His
generation?
For He was cut off from the
land of the living;
For the transgressions of My
people He was stricken.
And they made His grave with the
wicked—
But with the rich at His
death,
Because He had done no
violence,
Nor was any deceit in
His mouth.
Yet it pleased the LORD to
bruise Him;
He has put Him to
grief.
When You make His soul an
offering for sin,
He shall see His
seed, He shall prolong His days,
And the pleasure of the LORD
shall prosper in His hand.
He shall see the labor of
His soul,and be satisfied.
By His knowledge My
righteous Servant shall justify many,
For He shall bear their
iniquities.
Therefore I will
divide Him a portion with the great,
And He shall divide the
spoil with the strong,
Because He poured out His
soul unto death,
And He was numbered with the
transgressors,
And He bore the sin of many,
And made intercession for
the transgressors. (Isaiah 53:1-12)
Here we see the answer to our question. Bad things do happen
in a world effected every day by fallen sinful people. But God
loves us so much He paid the price for our wrongs. One day, God
will right this universe gone wrong. But now He is in the midst
of a rescue operation, reaching out to all who will receive His
offer of forgiveness and reconciliation. A reconciliation paid
for by the death of His own Son.
This is the day we specially remember what Jesus did to save
us from the ultimate bad thing - an eternity separated from our
Maker. That is why we call it "Good Friday".
When we understand what Jesus did for us on the cross, our
questions are answered.
It sounded like a major breakthrough - a bold step forward
toward peace in an increasingly troubled region. United States
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi engaging in shuttle diplomacy
between Israel and their seemingly intractable enemy,
Syria.
"We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the
road to Damascus is a road to peace," Pelosi told reporters
after her talks with (Syrian President Bashar )Assad.
AP
Pelosi said she and her delegation "expressed our
concern about Syria's connections to Hezbollah and Hamas"
and discussed the issue of militant fights slipping across the
Syrian border into Iraq. "These are important issues not
only in the fight against terrorism but important priorities for
us for peace in the Middle East," she said.
She said she brought a message to Assad from Israeli Prime
Minister Ehud Olmert that Israel was ready for peace talks with
Syria. Assad gave assurances that "he's ready to engage in
negotiations for peace with Israel," Pelosi said. She later
left Syria and arrived in Saudi Arabia, meeting with King
Abdullah, a top U.S. ally.
The Prime Minister's Office issued a rare
"clarification" Wednesday that, in gentle diplomatic
terms, contradicted US Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's
statement in Damascus that she had brought a message from Israel
about a willingness to engage in peace talks.
According to the statement, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
emphasized in his meeting with Pelosi on Sunday that
"although Israel is interested in peace with Syria, that
country continues to be part of the Axis of Evil and a force
that encourages terror in the entire Middle East."
Hmmm..Not exactly what the Speaker told the Syrians. It gets
worse.
Olmert, the statement clarified, told Pelosi that Syria's
sincerity about a genuine peace with Israel would be judged by
its willingness to "cease its support of terror, cease its
sponsoring of the Hamas and Islamic Jihad organizations, refrain
from providing weapons to Hizbullah and bringing about the
destabilizing of Lebanon, cease its support of terror in Iraq,
and relinquish the strategic ties it is building with the
extremist regime in Iran."
The statement said Olmert had not communicated to Pelosi
any change in Israeli policy on Damascus.
Pelosi, who met in Damascus with Syrian President Bashar
Assad over the objections of US President George W. Bush, said
she brought a message to Assad from Olmert saying that Israel
was ready for peace talks.
"We were very pleased with the reassurances we
received from the president [Assad] that he was ready to resume
the peace process. He was ready to engage in negotiations for
peace with Israel," Pelosi said after meeting Assad.
She said the meeting with the Syrian leader "enabled
us to communicate a message from Prime Minister Olmert that
Israel was ready to engage in peace talks as well."
According to officials in the Prime Minister's Office,
however, this was not what transpired during her meeting
with Olmert.
The officials said Olmert had told Pelosi that he thought
her trip to Damascus was a mistake, and that when she asked -
nevertheless - whether he had a message for Assad, Olmert said
Syria should first stop supporting terrorism and "act like
a normal country," and only then would Israel be willing to
hold discussions.
The first part of that message, the officials said, was
lost in what was reported from Damascus on Wednesday.
Something appears to have been lost in translation somewhere
between Jerusalem and Damascus. Just the minor details about
"ceasing support for terrorism" and "acting like
a normal country". Yeesh!
I couldn't help but think that Nancy Pelosi's diplomatic
pratfall powerfully illustrates for us a key biblical truth. Did
you know that the moment you became a Christian, you also
entered into a brand new job with God's diplomatic corps?
Therefore, we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God
were making an appeal through us; we beg you on behalf of
Christ, be reconciled to God. (II Corinthians 5:20)
As the events in Damascus and Jerusalem show us, a diplomat
gets into trouble when they fail to accurately relate the
message. In this case it was only sharing half of what Ehud
Olmert had to say.
Do we make the same mistake as Christians?
Certainly.
Like telling people "God loves the world."
No problem there. Most people will smile and applaud.
But when we include the rest of the message, "..that
He gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believes in Him
will not perish but have everlasting life." (John
3:16), well, that starts to sound a little narrow.
Like telling people, "And this is the testimony: that
God has given us eternal life, and this life is in His
Son." (I John 5:11)
We might expect to hear, "Great...Cool...Glad that Jesus
works for ya!"
But when we include the rest of the message, "He who
has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does
not have life." (I John 5:12), we might well expect
people to get a bit defensive. "So are you telling me I'm
not going to heaven unless I believe in Jesus?"
When the pressure is on it's easy to edit the truth. There is
no doubt that the chorus of criticism following Nancy
Pelosi may have pressured her to edit Ehud Olmert's
message to achieve a sincere and noble goal, a breakthrough in
the Middle East. But when we fail to accurately represent our
message sender, we find ourselves sadly and even embarrassingly
lacking in authority.
The same is true when we fail to accurately and fully relate
the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth of God's
Word to others.
I must confess, the last thing I want to hear from the Lord
is, "I never said that." Or, even worse,
"Why did you leave that out?"
When we prayerfully share God's truth, from a heart full of
love, without trying to make it more "real" or
"relevant" or "acceptable" to others, we can
have confidence that one day we will hear from our ultimate
Chief of State, ‘Well done, good and faithful
servant; you have been faithful over a few things, I will make
you ruler over many things. Enter into the joy of your lord.'
(Matthew 25:23)
As a wise man once shared with me, "If you have
something better to share with people than God's Word, then
share it. But until then, stick to the Bible."
Scott's Blog - 4/04/07
The 75 Percent Solution
Thanks to pot boiler novels, half baked documentaries, and
the fact that Easter is days away, the issue of the resurrection
of Jesus is once again front and center in the public eye.
So how is the message that Jesus rose from the dead in a
moment of history holding up in the market place of ideas?
Better than you'd think!
Study: Most Non-Born-Again Christians Still
Believe Jesus Resurrected
While Christians and documentaries try to prove the
resurrection of Christ this Easter, a surprising new study
reveals they may not need to. Many already believe Jesus rose
from the dead 2,000 years ago.
According to recent research by the Center for Missional
Research of the North American Mission Board – the Southern
Baptist domestic mission agency – 75 percent of Americans who
say they are not born-again Christians still believe the
biblical account of Jesus literally coming back to life in his
physical body.
"It really stunned us to learn that 75 percent of
those Americans claiming not to be born-again still believe in
the resurrection," said Phillip Connor, research missiology
manager for the Center for Missional Research, according to
Baptist Press.
Moreover, 59 percent of those who rarely attend church
believe in the resurrection of Christ and 39 percent of those
who never attend also believe. Among non-Protestants, 67 percent
still believe in the resurrection.
"Apparently, our contemporaries are less skeptical of
scriptural events like the resurrection than we may often
realize," stated the study report.
Nearly 100 percent of those identifying themselves as
born-again Christian believe in the resurrection of Jesus.
The most interesting aspect of this story is the seeming
disconnect between what Jesus did and what he taught.
Perhaps you have been in a conversation with a non believer
who has said something like, "I think Jesus was a good
teacher, but I don't accept His claim to be God."
As CS Lewis once observed that is the one thing we should
never say. Jesus left no breathing room for us on the issue of
His identity.
If you had known Me, you would have known My Father also;
and from now on you know Him and have seen Him.”
Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is
sufficient for us.”
Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and
yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen
the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? (John
14:7-9)
To put it directly, Moses never said, "He who has seen
me has seen YHWH."
Mohammed never said, "He who has seen me has seen
Allah."
Yet Jesus has the boldness to unabashedly make this claim.
Either that is true - or it isn't. And if it isn't, we
can call Jesus deranged (as Lewis put it "a lunatic on the
level with the man who says he is a poached egg"), or a
dangerous liar. But we can't call Him a good teacher. If you
think Jesus was "just a good teacher", what do you
think about what He taught?
In the same way, our poll reveals an overwhelming majority of
people who believe Jesus rose again in a moment of history - yet
have never taken Him up on the main reason He rose.
There was a man of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a ruler
of the Jews. This man came to Jesus by night and said to
Him, “Rabbi, we know that You are a teacher come from God; for
no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him.”
Jesus answered and said to him, “Most assuredly, I say
to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of
God." (John 3:1-3)
Contrary to popular belief Billy Graham didn't come up with
the term "born again" - Jesus did.
Being "born again" doesn't have anything to do with
where you go to church, or what political party you favor.
It has everything to do with God giving to us a new heart and
a new life.
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a
new creation; old things have passed away; behold, all things
have become new. (II Corinthians 5:17)
God doesn't desire our religious service. He wants a genuine
relationship with each of us. The offer of this personal
relationship with God is vividly expressed by Jesus in the book
of Revelation.
Behold, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone hears My
voice and opens the door, I will come in to him and dine with
him, and he with Me. (Revelation 3:20)
Have you ever taken Jesus up on His offer to dwell within
your heart?
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to
become children of God, to those who believe in His name: 13
who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor
of the will of man, but of God. (John 1:12)
If you have invited Christ to come into your life, to forgive
your sins, and make you the person He wants you to be -
Surprise! You have been born of God - born again.
If you can't point to a specific time in your life when you
made that decision, why not do it now?
Simply pray, "Father, I know that I have sinned. But I
believe you sent your Son to die on the cross to pay the price
for my wrongs. I believe Jesus rose from the dead so I could
have a new life. Please forgive my sins, come into my heart, and
make me the person you want me to be. I receive you this day as
my Lord and Savior. Thank you for saving me. In Jesus' Name,
Amen."
If you prayed that prayer in the sincerity of your heart, you
just became born again. And Jesus has a promise for you.
All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who
comes to Me I will by no means cast out.(John 6:37)
If you prayed that prayer, we would like to get into your
hands a package of information that can help you get started in
your brand new life in Jesus. Just give our customer service
number a call at (877)556-1212. There is no cost or
obligation.
Welcome to the family of God!
Scott's Blog - 4/03/07
To Heal, or Not to Heal? That is the Question!
What do you get when you mix inspiration, desperation and
superstition? Something like what has been happening near the
top of a 10,000 foot mountain in Ethiopia these days.
Thousands of Aids and HIV patients are risking their lives
by refusing medication in favour of holy water, Sky News can
reveal.
The controversial treatment is offered by a church in
Ethiopia which claims to have cured hundreds of believers.
Sky News correspondent Ian Woods reports
on the practice doctors in the country say is extremely
dangerous:
"It was a scene which reminded me of the holocaust.
Naked men, women and children, some of them in chains to
prevent them escaping, cower in front of the men in
charge in a dimly-lit room in the church of St Mary on
Mount Entoto.
These people fear death, but they believe that coming here
will prolong their lives. It is more likely to have the opposite
effect.
The church is 10,000ft above sea level, where the air
is thin. Climbing this peak takes your breath away, and so does
the view over the sprawling city of Addis Adaba below.
As we approached the church, we were told both boots and
socks had to be removed. This is regarded as sacred ground, and
everyone must go barefoot.
Some are held in chains
The church itself is more than 100 years old, a simple
building painted in bright colours. It sits above a mountain
stream, and the Ethiopian Orthodox Church believes the stream is
holy water with the power to cure HIV/Aids.
Every day, thousands of people with the virus come here to
be "baptised", though the act is performed without
ceremony and in a way which seems brutal to outsiders.
Plastic jerry cans are filled with water from a pool, and
passed along a human chain to priests dressed like deep sea
fishermen. The bright yellow waterproofs protect them from the
drenching they administer to their congregation.
Sky's Ian Woods
They hurl the water over the mass of people kneeling in
front of them who shriek and scream, either through devotion or
the simple shock of the cold water hitting their naked flesh.
Some cried out for the demons to leave their body, while
priests hit them with wooden crosses. Many of them clutched
their babies while the water was is shaken from the plastic
containers. It is an extraordinary sight.
Afterwards they get dressed and move into another room for
two hours of prayers, sermons, ritual and testimonies from those
who claim that the holy water has cured them. Some people have
been coming here for years in search of a miracle.
As I read this harrowing account, it hit me that the old
saying is true - the more things change, the more they stay the
same. The crowd at Mount Entoto seems remarkably similar to
another desperate group of miracle seekers in Jesus' day.
After this there was a feast of the Jews, and Jesus went
up to Jerusalem. Now there is in Jerusalem by the Sheep Gate
a pool, which is called in Hebrew, Bethesda, having five
porches. In these lay a great multitude of sick people,
blind, lame, paralyzed, waiting for the moving of the
water. For an angel went down at a certain time into the
pool and stirred up the water; then whoever stepped in first,
after the stirring of the water, was made well of whatever
disease he had. Now a certain man was there who had an infirmity
thirty-eight years. When Jesus saw him lying there, and knew
that he already had been in that condition a long time,
He said to him, “Do you want to be made well?”
The sick man answered Him, “Sir, I have no man to put me into
the pool when the water is stirred up; but while I am coming,
another steps down before me.”
Jesus said to him, “Rise, take up your bed and
walk.” And immediately the man was made well, took up
his bed, and walked. (John 5:1-8)
There are a number of fascinating insights to be gleaned in
this account. This five porch structure called Bethesda used to
be exhibit "A" in the skeptics case against the
historical reliability of the Bible. But in 1963, a public works
project in Jerusalem uncovered this site, just as John described
it.
But notice the convergence of desperation and superstition we
find here. Most scholars believe the account of the angel
occasionally stirring up the water was an accurate account of
the folklore that surrounded this pool. It seems a stretch to
believe that the Lord would honor the selfish and the strong
over the weak and powerless when a healing would take place. But
any hope is better than no hope and so the man in the account
waited 38 years for his chance at deliverance.
Or did he?
Jesus' question is telling - "Do you want to be made
well?" There are some who learn to not only live with
an infirmity, but also to love the victim status that goes with
it. "Do you really want to be made whole, or just stay in
the same familiar spot in Woe-Is-Me-ville?"
Some in our day, reacting against the excesses that sometimes
accompany sensationalistic "healing ministries", have
given up on God actually intervening physically in the lives of
people. "There are greater lessons to be learned in
suffering, so accept your lot in this life and maybe you'll be
made whole when you get to heaven."
There is no doubt that God can and does use adversity in our
lives. Consider the experience of the Apostle Paul.
And lest I be exalted above measure by the abundance of
the revelations, a thorn in the flesh was given to me, a
messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above
measure. Concerning this thing I pleaded with the Lord three
times that it might depart from me. And He said to me,
"My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made
perfect in weakness." (II Corinthians 12:7-9)
But there is also no doubt that the Bible tells us that it is
never wrong to ask for a healing.
Is anyone among you sick? Let him call for the elders of
the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil
in the name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith will save the
sick, and the Lord will raise him up. (James 4:14-15)
Does every person who seeks a healing receive it? No. And by
the way, that has nothing to do with the quality of the faith of
the person involved. The man Jesus healed at Bethesda
immediately turned Jesus in to His enemies as a Sabbath breaker!
But does that mean no one ever receives a healing? No. God
does choose to intervene in wonderful ways in response to
prayer.
How can we keep this in balance?
When Jesus was in the Garden of Gethsemane, facing a crushing
load of stress in anticipation of the cross, He prayed a
marvelous prayer.
"Father, if it be Your will, let this cup pass from
Me. Nevertheless, not My will, but Yours, be done." (Luke
22:42)
When facing similar stress we should follow Jesus'
example.
First we should focus on our Father. Not on some earthly
pastor, or a place were some are rumored to be healed. People
and programs will always let us down. But we can trust in the
wisdom of our heavenly Father.
Secondly, we shouldn't be afraid to pray, "If it
be your will." Some in the Faith movement have said this is
a cop out, allowing people an out from exercising real faith.
But if Jesus prayed that prayer, it seems His approach is at
odds with the "Name it and claim it" set. Personally,
I would rather put my healing in the hands of the Great
Physician than in some theory put forth by a guy with a greasy
pompadour standing behind a Lucite pulpit.
Third, we need to realize that genuine faith puts our lives
in God's hands. Especially when we are hurting and confused.
"For I know the plans I have for you", declares
the Lord. "Plans for welfare and not for calamity, to give
you a future and a hope." (Jeremiah 29:11)
God still miraculously heals today. We should not be afraid
to ask for this blessing as we need it. But God also reserves
the right to decide whether that healing will come now, or after
a time of faith building patience. Whether it will come fully in
this life, or when we stand before Him and are amazed as He
personally wipes every tear from our eyes.
We don't have to climb a 10,00 foot mountain to receive that!
Scott's Blog - 4/02/07
April 2007 - Showdown In the Gulf?
There is no doubt that April 2007 fits to a tee the ancient
Chinese curse "May you live in interesting
times!"
Headline:
IDF intelligence: Iran,
Hizbullah preparing for possible US strike
Head
of military intelligence says Iran, Syria and
Hizbullah preparing for possible confrontation with
US this summer
Iran, Syria and Hizbullah are preparing for a
possible military confrontation with the United
States in the summer, the head of the IDF's Military
Intelligence said Sunday.
Apr.
1, 2007 1:00 | Updated Apr.
1, 2007 13:15 'US ready
to strike Iran on Good Friday' By JERUSALEM
POST STAFF AND AP
A flight
deck crew passes by a fighter
jet as it prepares to take off
on the second day of
operations on board of the USS
John C. Stennis Wednesday in
Persian Gulf waters.
Photo: AP
The United States will be ready
to launch a missile attack on Iran's
nuclear facilities as soon as early
this month, perhaps "from 4 a.m.
until 4 p.m. on April 6,"
according to reports in the Russian
media on Saturday.
According to Russian
intelligence sources, the reports
said, the US has devised a plan to
attack several targets in Iran, and an
assault could be carried out by
launching missiles from fighter jets
and warships stationed in the Persian
Gulf.
Russian news agency RIA Novosti
quoted a security official as saying,
"Russian intelligence has
information that the US Armed Forces
stationed in the Persian Gulf have
nearly completed preparations for a
missile strike against Iranian
territory."
Iran accuses US jet fighters of violating airspace
AFP/File
Photo: A US bomber flies over Baghdad's skies in a
show of force, February 2007.
Sun Apr 1, 3:27 PM ET
TEHRAN (AFP) - US warplanes have violated
Iranian airspace in the southwestern oil province of
Khuzestan, the Arabic language channel of Iranian
state television quoted a local military chief as
saying on Sunday.
However, a US military spokesman said he had
checked into reports of an airspace violation and
denied that any took place.
"Two US aircraft trespassed into Iranian
airspace northwest of (the port city of) Abadan before
flying southwest into
Iraq,"
a Revolutionary Guards commander in Abadan identified
only as Colonel Aqili was quoted as saying by the Al-Alam
channel's website.
"The planes left white vapour trails,
attracting the local people's attention," he
said, without elaborating on when the alleged
incursion took place.
The incident happened close to Iran's border
with Iraq, where the US and British military are
deployed in force, he said.
A US military spokesman told AFP that he had
investigated the Iranian military's claim and found no
evidence to support it.
"There is nothing that we saw that would
indicate that that happened," he told AFP.
The United States is in a mounting diplomatic
confrontation with
Iran
over its efforts to master the nuclear fuel cycle and
Western suspicions that Tehran is bent on developing
nuclear weapons, a charge vehemently denied by Iran.
Washington says it wants a diplomatic solution
to the nuclear standoff but has never ruled out
military action.
Tensions have spiked since Iran's seizure on
March 23 of 15 British marines and sailors for
allegedly entering Iranian waters.
Iran says the Britons entered its waters
illegally while London insists they were in Iraqi
waters on an anti-smuggling patrol under UN mandate.
What to make of all this? The words of Jesus concerning
the Last Days are particularly instructive here.
And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed
that no one deceives you. For many will come in My name,
saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many. And
you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are
not troubled; for allthese things must
come to pass, but the end is not yet. For nation will rise
against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. And there
will be famines, pestilences, and earthquakes in various
places. All these are the beginning of sorrows."
(Matthew 24:4-8)
The perspective Jesus brings to times like these can
help us avoid to equal and opposite mistakes. The first is
to assume that the next international dust up in the
Middle East will immediately lead to the Battle of
Armaggedon. As we have seen, the Bible does tell us that
there will be an End Times invasion of Israel, lead by
Russia. Iran will be one of the major allies in this
event. This tells us that the current alliances we see in
the region are coming into line with the picture we see in
Ezekiel 38-39. But the Bible also tells us this event will
take place when Israel is living in peace.
‘Thus says the Lord GOD: “On that day it shall
come to pass that thoughts will arise in your mind,
and you will make an evil plan: You will say, ‘I will go
up against a land of unwalled villages; I will go to a
peaceful people, who dwell safely, all of them dwelling
without walls, and having neither bars nor gates’— to
take plunder and to take booty, to stretch out your hand
against the waste places that are again inhabited,
and against a people gathered from the nations, who have
acquired livestock and goods, who dwell in the midst of
the land." (Ezekiel 38:10-12)
I believe this predicted invasion will take place when
Israel is living in the false peace brought in by the
Anti-Christ when he comes to power. In this light,
the current confrontation in the Gulf is best seen as
another birth pain that Jesus told us would happen. But "the
end is not yet."
The equal and opposite error is to assume that because
the Anti-Christ is not yet on the scene, we can somehow
conclude that we have lots of time before things get
serious prophetically. But Jesus told us that His return
for His people at the Rapture can happen at any time.
“But of that day and hour no one knows, not even
the angels of heaven,but My Father only. But
as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming
of the Son of Man be. For as in the days before the flood,
they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in
marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and did
not know until the flood came and took them all away, so
also will the coming of the Son of Man be. Then two men
will be in the field: one will be taken and the other
left. Two women will be grinding at the mill: one
will be taken and the other left. Watch therefore, for you
do not know what hour your Lord is coming. But know this,
that if the master of the house had known what hour the
thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed
his house to be broken into. Therefore you also be ready,
for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect."
(Matthew 24:36-44)
The Biblical balance? When we see events like these
taking place in prophetically significant places, it
should be a reminder to us that Jesus did promise to
return and that the Bible gives us a heavenly heads up on
how we can know he time is drawing near. Christians should
never panic or go into "Chicken Little Mode"
because we know that God has a perfect plan and nothing in
this world will catch Him by surprise. In fact, in a world
that is increasingly filled with tension and stress,
believers can know great peace because we aren't looking
for the end of the world, but God's glorious new
beginning. We aren't looking for the Anti-Christ, but
Jesus Christ! And that makes all the difference when you
live in "interesting times"!
For the grace of God that brings salvation has
appeared to all men, teaching us that, denying ungodliness
and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously,
and godly in the present age, looking for the blessed hope
and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus
Christ, who gave Himself for us, that He might redeem us
from every lawless deed and purify for Himself His
own special people, zealous for good works. (Titus
2:11-14)