(SRL Home)

Scott's Blog - 12/26/07

The Year in Prophecy 2007

"Does anybody really know what time it is?" asked the jazz rock group Chicago back in the 70's.

As we come to the end of 2007 there are few questions that are more relevant, especially when it comes to the subject of God's plans for this world as revealed in Biblical prophecy.

How can we know where we stand on God's time table concerning the return of Jesus? The short answer is, we can't. At least not when it comes to setting dates and starting count downs.

“But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only. But as the days of Noah were, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. For as in the days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and did not know until the flood came and took them all away, so also will the coming of the Son of Man be. Then two men will be in the field: one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding at the mill: one will be taken and the other left. Watch therefore, for you do not know what hour your Lord is coming. But know this, that if the master of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched and not allowed his house to be broken into. Therefore you also be ready, for the Son of Man is coming at an hour you do not expect. (Matthew 24:36-44)

There are, however signs that a set of Biblical predictions associated with the Last Days are beginning to take shape. More than any other "sign of the times", the lead players in an event known as the Invasion of Gog and Magog have dominated the headlines.

Consider the following events we have chronicled here on Scott's Blog and their stunning symmetry with Ezekiel chapters 38-89.


Here Comes the New Czar, Same As the Old Czar?

Students of Biblical prophecy are paying more and more attention to Ezekiel 38-39, the now famous section of scripture detailing a last days invasion of Israel.

Now the word of the LORD came to me, saying,  “Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him,  and say, ‘Thus says the Lord GOD: “Behold, I am against you, O Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal.  I will turn you around, put hooks into your jaws, and lead you out, with all your army, horses, and horsemen, all splendidly clothed, a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords.  Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are with them, all of them with shield and helmet;  Gomer and all its troops; the house of Togarmah from the far north and all its troops—many people are with you.
 “Prepare yourself and be ready, you and all your companies that are gathered about you; and be a guard for them.  After many days you will be visited. In the latter years you will come into the land of those brought back from the sword and gathered from many people on the mountains of Israel, which had long been desolate; they were brought out of the nations, and now all of them dwell safely.  You will ascend, coming like a storm, covering the land like a cloud, you and all your troops and many peoples with you.” (Ezekiel 38:1-9)

It is not only significant to note that the land of Magog has been historically identified with the territory of modern Russia, but also that this prophecy is directed toward a single ruler over this country called "Gog".

The close association of the name of the ruler with the name of the country has lead to speculation that this individual would exercise almost unquestioned and unchecked power over his nation. In the case of Russia, it would require far more personal power than was exercised by any Soviet style premiere. Even powerful leaders like Khrushchev or Gorbachev had to play politics with various factions of the Communist politburo to accomplish their ends.

What is likely in view here is the rise of a leader with a grasp of unchecked autonomous power not seen since a czar like Peter the Great.

We may be seeing just such an individual power grab taking place in our day.

Putin to be PM in future Russia government

By Oleg Shchedrov Mon Dec 17, 11:09 AM ET

Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during a nationwide TV broadcast in Moscow November 29, 2007. (RIA-Novosti/Kremlin/Reuters)

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Monday he was ready to become prime minister if his close ally Dmitry Medvedev succeeds him, giving Putin a way to keep a grip on power after he leaves the Kremlin.

A 42-year-old lawyer with no political base of his own, Medvedev is virtually certain to win next March's presidential election since most Russians will vote for whoever the highly popular Putin endorses.

"If Russian citizens express their confidence in Dmitry Medvedev and elect him as the country's president, I will be ready to head the government," Putin told a congress of his United Russia party held near Moscow's Red Square.

"(We) shouldn't be ashamed or afraid of transferring the key powers of the country, the destiny of Russia to the hands of such a man," Putin added in his speech.

Medvedev, 42, was later adopted by the congress as United Russia's presidential candidate. Delegates voted 478-1 in a sober, Soviet-style ceremony held without debate.

In his brief acceptance speech, Medvedev listed priorities such as strengthening Russia's position in the world, preserving the Russian nation, looking after the young and the old.

"All this is in Vladimir Putin's strategy. I will be guided by this strategy, if I am elected president," Medvedev said.

"But carrying out an idea can only be successful with the participation of its author. I have no doubt that in the future Vladimir Vladimirovich (Putin) will use all his resources, all his influence in Russia and abroad for the benefit of Russia."

Putin signaled Medvedev, a first deputy prime minister and chairman of state gas giant Gazprom, last week as his preferred successor. The constitution bars Putin from a third term.

Analysts said the choice of a loyal longtime colleague signaled Putin's desire to keep a grip on power after leaving the Kremlin. The two men have worked together for 17 years.

Putin walked into the congress hall side by side with Medvedev to applause from the serried ranks of dark-suited delegates. Both men wore dark suits with white shirts and ties and stood to attention as participants sang the national anthem.

The long and the short of this is that if Medvedev wins the presidency, Putin gets a promotion. Medvedev will have the title of president, but Putin will have free reign to run the country.

In domestic policy, foreign affairs, even military decision making, the will of Putin and Russia will become synonymous.

Will Vlad Putin prove to be the predicted Russian leader of Ezekiel 38-39? Time will tell. But it is significant that the very governmental structure of Russia is being altered so that such a scenario could be easily realized in the near future.

How will Putin use his power? It has become clear that his foreign policy will be two fold - cultivate a cozy relationship with Iran, and create increasing pressure on Israel.

Next Year..In Moscow?

At the end of each celebration of the Passover Seder, Jews down through time have concluded with the classic closing words of hope, "Next year in Jerusalem!"

If Vladimir Putin has his way, there will be a slight variation on that theme - "Next year in Moscow!"



Nations United Against Israel

Russia: We've got Israel next

Source: The Jerusalem Post
December 03, 2007

Just as it did after the Madrid conference, which it co-hosted with the United States in 1991, Russia moved quickly last week to ensure that it will be in line to host the first post-Annapolis conference.

This is according to an official at the Russian embassy in Washington DC.

While a date for the follow up event was not yet set, the official said he believes that Moscow will ensure an ongoing leading role in developments by hosting talks that will "cover all the tracks" relating to a conclusive Israel-Arab peace agreement.

Russia is currently in the throes of an election that is believed rigged to ensure Vladimir Putin's party is returned to power with an overwhelming majority.

Putin himself is thought to be eyeing some form of power position that will enable him to keep his hands firmly on the reins of the Russian bear.

Since this story crossed the wires, an ominous series of developments has transpired in Russia.

art.putin.tehran.afp.gi.jpg

Putin, right, is greeted by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad following his arrival in Tehran.

 

Putin brushes off criticism over elections

By Neil Buckley and Catherine Belton in Moscow

Vladimir Putin has brushed off unprecedented international criticism of Russia’s parliamentary elections.

The Russian president said the elections on Sunday were legitimate in spite of widespread complaints of abuses and claims that the polls were unfair and deeply flawed.

 Germany said that “measured by our standards, it was neither a free, fair nor democratic election”, while the British foreign ministry called on Russia’s central election commission to “urgently investigate all allegations of electoral abuses”.

European election observers said there had been “frequent abuse of administrative re-sources, media coverage strongly in favour of the ruling party and an election code whose cumulative effect hindered political pluralism”.

But Mr. Putin said the 64.1 per cent victory for the pro-Kremlin United Russia party – whose ticket he headed – was a signal of trust. “It’s now clear to me that Russians will never allow their country to develop along the destructive path seen in some other countries of the former Soviet Union,” he said.

 The result is expected to provide a platform for Mr. Putin to remain Russia’s most influential politician while complying with a constitutional bar on more than two consecutive presidential terms by stepping down next year.

At our Scott Richards Live - Alive! event last Friday, special guest Joel Rosenberg went into detail about the prophesied last days invasion of Israel called the War of Gog and Magog.

In Ezekiel 38-39,  we see predicted the rise of a modern day czar in Russia who will head up a coalition of nations bent on destroying Israel. At his side in this venture will be an unprecedented ally, Persia, or modern Iran.

Historically, Russia and Iran have never had any kind of alliance.

But now all that has changed.

Russia supplies Iran with not only the materials and expertise necessary for her nuclear programs, but also sophisticated missile technology to defend it. Any attempt at meaningful economic sanctions against Iran is vetoed by Russia at the UN.

Why have these nations become such strange bed fellows in our day? Consider these ominously on target words God speaks to the head of this future coalition.

I will turn you around, put hooks into your jaws, and lead you out, with all your army, horses, and horsemen, all splendidly clothed, a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords.  Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are with them, all of them with shield and helmet;  Gomer and all its troops; the house of Togarmah from the far north and all its troops—many people are with you. (Ezekiel 38:4-6)

The image here is graphic. Russia is dragged into leading this conflict painfully, against her will - with hooks in her jaws.

What kind of pain has pushed Russia under Putin into an increasingly cozy alliance with the radical Islamic leadership of Iran?

Consider this possibility.

It was not too long ago that Russia was saddled with it's own burden in the global war on terror. Islamic fundamentalists in the breakaway former Soviet Republic of Chechnya were not only fighting the Russians, but striking increasingly savage blows.

Beslan school hostage crisis

Beslan school hostage crisis
Photos of the victims on the walls of the former SNO

The Beslan school hostage crisis (also referred to as the Beslan school siege or Beslan massacre) began when a group of armed Chechen separatists and supporters took more than 1,200 schoolchildren and adults hostage on September 1, 2004, at School Number One (SNO) in the town of Beslan, North Ossetia-Alania, (an autonomous republic in the North Caucasus region of the Russian Federation). On the third day of the standoff, a chaotic gun battle broke out between the hostage-takers and Russian security forces. Three hundred and thirty-four (334) civilians were killed,[1] including 186 children,[2] and hundreds more were wounded. Chechen terrorist Shamil Basayev took responsibility for the hostage taking.

The Beslan tragedy was merely a battle in a terror campaign that included everything from assassinations, sub way bombings, and the simultaneous explosion of two Russian airliners in mid flight.

Yet since 2006, the number of incidents with Islamist Chechen rebels has mysteriously dropped to almost zero.

And, interestingly, the unqualified support for the mad mullahs in Tehran has risen to new heights.

Putin has placed support of Iran's drive toward becoming a nuclear power even ahead of good relations with the United States and the European Union.

Why?

Putin is no fool. He knows that the southern border of his loosely connected Russian Federation, from Georgia to Siberia, is dominated by Shiite Moslems.

How can he most effectively keep Kazakhs and Azerbaijanis and Uzbeks from following in the footsteps of their Chechen brethren? By identifying with them against a common foe - an enemy that Shiite Moslems feel a religious obligation to wipe off the face of the earth - Israel.

And the strategy appears to be working.

As Joel Rosenberg suggested at our gathering on Friday night, what would happen if the Russians and Iranians decided to follow the lead of the United States approach to the weapons of mass destruction problem in Iraq?

What if they used the United Nations as a platform to declare the entire Middle East a "nuclear free zone" and then demanded that Israel disarm? What if they put together their own "coalition of the willing" to enforce the resolution?

Russia has had a long and shameful past in her persecution of the Jews. She needs no help in hating Israel or wishing her to cease to exist.

But could it be the desire to get out of harms way concerning Islamic terrorism that will succeed in putting the predicted painful "hooks" in Russia's jaws?

From the view of a ruthless leader like former KGB head Vlad Putin, there may be no alternative than to do directly what Russia has attempted to accomplish by proxy armies in 1967 and 1973 - wipe Israel off the map.

To allow the chaos and carnage that dominated during the Chechen conflict to return will cause his own people to rise against him. He may very well conclude that either Israel goes, or he does.

At that moment, the hooks will be set.

Keep watching events involving Russia and Iran with an eye to Ezekiel 38-39. I would also highly recommend Joel Rosenberg's DVD and book Epicenter as essential viewing in these "interesting times." http://www.joelrosenberg.com/books.asp

The moves of Vlad Putin against Israel have to this point been subtle and diplomatic. But the same can't be said for Russia's new ally and leading customer for nuclear technology Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

How Much Is Enough?

Have you ever got into a discussion with a conspiracy theory buff? Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the experience is that whether the person believes that man never landed on the moon, or that moon men are really running congress (Insert your own "That would explain a lot!" joke here), their point of view seems to be absolutely impervious to any logical argument. 

You may have found yourself responding to the discussion by shaking your head and saying, "How much proof do you need? What would it take to change your mind?"

More often than not, when we encounter a "Don't confuse me with the facts, my mind is made up!" situation we walk away thinking, "Wow! How much proof is enough?"

I couldn't help but think of a conversation with a conspiracy kook or two when I read the latest dispatch from Tehran.

Iran challenges Europe to hand over Holocaust 'proof'

Feb 06 5:36 AM US/Eastern

An Iranian government-sponsored body set up to probe the veracity of the Holocaust has challenged Europe to hand over documents about the mass slaughter of Jews in World War II.

Mohammad Ali Ramin, the head of the "World Holocaust Foundation" created after Iran's controversial Holocaust conference last year, said Austria, Germany and Poland in particular should supply documents.

"They should hand over the proof for the dossier on the organized massacre of Jews in Europe during World War II to the independent international fact-finding committee affiliated to this foundation," the IRNA state news agency quoted him as saying on Tuesday.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad ordered the creation of the foundation after inviting a number of controversial revisionist Holocaust researchers to a conference in Tehran in December that caused an international outcry.

Ahmadinejad has repeatedly questioned the scale of the Holocaust, described the mass killing of six million Jews in World War II as a "myth" and also called for Israel to be "wiped from the map".

The foreign researchers invited to the conference -- some of whom have criminal records at home -- gave papers claiming the Holocaust never happened on the scale assumed by the vast majority of historians.

Mainstream historians specializing in the Third Reich counter there is ample documentary proof that around six million Jews were killed by the Nazis in World War II although some estimates put the figure slightly higher or lower.

The UN General Assembly last month unanimously approved a US-proposed resolution condemning denial of the Holocaust, in a move diplomats said was directly aimed at Iran's stance.

What the supposed search for the truth in Tehran illustrates is that philosophy usually trumps proof. What would satisfy this supposed search for the truth? The testimony of Holocaust survivors? The word of the men who liberated the death camps? Documents like the infamous Wannsee Protocols that detailed the horrors of Hitler's "Final Solution"? How much proof would be enough? 

This phenomenon is never more clearly on display than when skeptics declare, "There is no proof that God exists!" Author, scientist and peace advocate Bertrand Russell was once asked what he would say if after death he met the God he spent his life denying. He replied, "I would say, "Sir, why did you not make Your existence more evident?"

The question Bertrand Russell may very well have heard in response is simple, yet searching, "How much would have been enough?"

When we look around we see awesome design and consistency in the creation that demands a designer.

When we look within we see an insatiable need for purpose and meaning in this life, and a persistent curiosity about the next. This would be strange indeed if all we are is a cosmic accident.

When we look back in history we see that God has settled the issue by walking among us in the Person of Jesus Christ.

And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. (John 1:12)

More than enough evidence for any fair enquirer.

But as they say, "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."

Combine these accounts with the recent news that Russia will be supplying Iran with an additional 119 nuclear reactors, and we see that 2007 was a year where the players in the prophesied invasion of Israel in the Last Days are taking their places on the world stage.

What to expect in 2008? We will continue to see an increasingly hostile stance taken toward Israel in the court of world opinion. Unfortunately we may also see an eroding of US support for Israel, as the price for standing behind God's chosen people becomes increasingly high. Following the collapse of the American sponsored Annapolis peace conference, we may see an increase of influence by the European Union as potential trouble shooters for the region.

But suffice it to say that by this time next year the words of Zechariah 12 may be even more relevant than today.

The burden of the word of the LORD against Israel. Thus says the LORD, who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him:  “Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of drunkenness to all the surrounding peoples, when they lay siege against Judah and Jerusalem. And it shall happen in that day that I will make Jerusalem a very heavy stone for all peoples; all who would heave it away will surely be cut in pieces, though all nations of the earth are gathered against it. (Zechariah 12:1-3)

 


 

Scott's Blog 12/24-25/07



The True Meaning of Christmas (A User's Guide)

I have to admit the first Bible study I was ever exposed to was taught by a cartoon character.



Over the years, I have heard that very same verse (Luke 2:8-14) quoted and printed on Christmas cards.

But when we take a closer look at those familiar words we discover that the same miracle the shepherds experienced is available to each of us today.

The Recipients of the First Christmas

Now there were in the same country shepherds living out in the fields, keeping watch over their flock by night. (Luke 2:8)

To whom did God chose to reveal the most stunning news in all of human history?

It wasn't to the scribes who sat pouring over the writings of the rabbis.

It wasn't to the religious leaders blowing trumpets to call attention to their good deeds.

It wasn't to the rich and powerful Temple officials who debated philosophy when they weren't devising another scheme to separate the faithful from their money.

It was to a group of nondescript shepherds.

Contrary to popular belief, shepherds weren't the most admired people in Jewish culture of the day. Shepherding was considered dirty and often ceremonially defiling work. It didn't tend to draw the best or the brightest to its ranks. In fact, many considered shepherds untrustworthy, definitely not "A-list" material on the social scale.

So who did God chose to receive the Good News?

People who were simple enough to believe the message when it came.

And it's been the same way ever since.

For you see your calling, brethren, that not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called. But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty; and the base things of the world and the things which are despised God has chosen, and the things which are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, that no flesh should glory in His presence. But of Him you are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God—and righteousness and sanctification and redemption— that, as it is written, “He who glories, let him glory in the LORD.” (I Corinthians 1:26-31)

Christmas reminds us that we are not in the kingdom because we are a credit to it. Rather, God saves people like us to show the world that if there is hope for us there is hope for anyone.

The Revelation of the First Christmas

And behold, an angel of the Lord stood before them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were greatly afraid. Then the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid, for behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy which will be to all people. For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be the sign to you: You will find a Babe wrapped in swaddling cloths, lying in a manger.”
And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying:
       “ Glory to God in the highest,
      And on earth peace, goodwill toward men!” (Luke 2:9-14)

What was the message of the first Christmas? It was all about Jesus.

We see in the announcement by the angel -

The Purpose of Jesus - "For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior"

He came with a mission in mind, a task to be accomplished. It was God's plan from eternity past to send His Son to save us from our sins. Consider this prophecy written seven hundred years before Jesus was born.

Surely He has borne our griefs
      And carried our sorrows;
      Yet we esteemed Him stricken,
      Smitten by God, and afflicted.
        But He was wounded for our transgressions,
      He was bruised for our iniquities;
      The chastisement for our peace was upon Him,
      And by His stripes we are healed.
        All we like sheep have gone astray;
      We have turned, every one, to his own way;
      And the LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all. (Isaiah 53:4-6)

The Power of Jesus - "Who is Christ"

The word "Christ" literally means "the Anointed One". There were three occasions when a leader would be "anointed"( that is to have ceremonial oil poured out upon his head). Service as a prophet, a priest or a king would begin with this ritual. This Child would uniquely fulfill all three of these spiritual offices.
Jesus would also demonstrate a life empowered by God's Holy Spirit on a level and to a degree unseen before or since. As John the Baptist put it:

"He who has received His testimony has set his seal to this, that God is true.

"For He whom God has sent speaks the words of God; for He gives the Spirit without measure.

"The Father loves the Son and has given all things into His hand. (John 3:32-35)

The Personality of Jesus - "The Lord"

Jesus would be far more than just a gifted Teacher, or a religious reformer, or even a miracle worker. He was (and is) God.

Again, the prophet Isaiah gives us an amazing spiritual heads up concerning Jesus.

For unto us a Child is born,
      Unto us a Son is given;
      And the government will be upon His shoulder.
      And His name will be called
      Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
      Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace. (Isaiah 9:6)

Christmas is a time that should also remind us of God's great plan for us, revealed in His Word. God desires to give each of us a Christmas gift, a deeper and fuller understanding of the Bible. The single best way to make Bible study come alive for us is to realize that ultimately the meaning of the Bible is to be found in the Person of Jesus.

The rituals of the Old Testament are object lessons of His life and work.

The history is literally "His Story", how God would work to bring His Son into the world.

The commands are a reflection of His character.

As Jesus Himself put it;

You search the Scriptures, for in them you think you have eternal life; and these are they which testify of Me. (John 5:39)

The Response of Christmas

So what did the shepherds do with this invaluable information?

So it was, when the angels had gone away from them into heaven, that the shepherds said to one another, “Let us now go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has come to pass, which the Lord has made known to us.” And they came with haste and found Mary and Joseph, and the Babe lying in a manger. Now when they had seen Him, they made widely known the saying which was told them concerning this Child. And all those who heard it marveled at those things which were told them by the shepherds. But Mary kept all these things and pondered them in her heart. Then the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things that they had heard and seen, as it was told them. (Luke 2:16-20)


The shepherds had heard, from an angel no less, what they were to believe. But the remarkable thing is, they decided to make this new found information personal in their lives. They went to see for themselves what the angel announced.


Christmas is a call for us to do the very same thing. Most of us know what we believe about Christmas, but do we know the why behind it? if someone were to ask you why you believe that Jesus, this baby born in a manger in Bethlehem is the Son of God, how would you respond?

If, like the shepherds we seek to know the truth of God for ourselves personally, we will not only have a strong and durable faith, but one that makes sense when we share it with others.

Notice as well, the shepherds didn't keep this news to themselves - "they made widely known the saying which was told them concerning this child".  Christmas is a time that reminds us why the Lord desires for us to share His message with others. it has been said a joy shared is twice a joy. Could you imagine getting engaged, or hitting a hole in one and never telling anyone about the experience? Sharing is half the fun when something wonderful happens to us. The same thing is true in our relationship with God.

For the love of Christ compels us, because we judge thus: that if One died for all, then all died; and He died for all, that those who live should live no longer for themselves, but for Him who died for them and rose again. (II Corinthians 5:14-15)

Quite a bit of spiritual treasure in a very familiar passage, isn't there? May the Lord give you a wonderful Christmas gift this year - a passion to know Him as He is revealed in His Word. And you will find this promise fulfilled in your life.

For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, says the LORD, thoughts of peace and not of evil, to give you a future and a hope. Then you will call upon Me and go and pray to Me, and I will listen to you. And you will seek Me and find Me, when you search for Me with all your heart. (Jeremiah 29:11-13)







Scott's Blog - 12/20/07

We Three Kings?

Mark Twain was once famously quoted as saying, "The problem with most folks isn't what they don't know. It's what they do know that just ain't so that's the problem."

Christmas time has a funny way of bringing this principle to the forefront.

One of the most eye opening discoveries I have made in my journey through God's Word is just how often and how radically God's Word and the taken for granted traditions of culture are at odds.

A classic example of this phenomenon in action is the story of the three wise men. The account of the arrival of the Magi is related to us in the eye witness biography of Jesus we call the book of Matthew.

Now after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem,  saying, “Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.” When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him. And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born.
 So they said to him, “In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it is written by the prophet:
        ‘ But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,
      Are not the least among the rulers of Judah;
      For out of you shall come a Ruler
       Who will shepherd My people Israel.’

 Then Herod, when he had secretly called the wise men, determined from them what time the star appeared.  And he sent them to Bethlehem and said, “Go and search carefully for the young Child, and when you have found Him, bring back word to me, that I may come and worship Him also.”
 When they heard the king, they departed; and behold, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was.  When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceedingly great joy.  And when they had come into the house, they saw the young Child with Mary His mother, and fell down and worshiped Him. And when they had opened their treasures, they presented gifts to Him: gold, frankincense, and myrrh.
 Then, being divinely warned in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed for their own country another way. (Matthew 2:1-12)

One of the best ways to separate fact from fiction is to approach this account by asking a few basic questions.

Who Were These Wise Men?

The term "wise men" is a significant one in the original language. It is the Greek word "magoi". We get our term "magician" from this root. But the word was far more significant during the time of Christ. The "magoi" are identified by the Greek historian Herodotus with a group of priests/ political power brokers who held great power in one of Rome's great rivals, the Parthian Empire. The Parthians held a good portion of the territory to the east of the Promised Land, including the areas formerly known as Babylon and Medo Persia.

The "Magi" traced their roots back to the court spiritual advisers of Babylon. Over time they assumed more and more power, eventually being the ones who would decide who would be the next king over Parthia.

What Were They Doing in Jerusalem?

Matthew tells us these ancient king-makers were looking for a special King, not just the next ruler of the Jews, but one whom they would "worship"- a spiritual ruler unlike any the world had ever seen. How could they have possibly anticipated such a thing? Interestingly, one of the most famous "Magi" of all time was a man whose spiritual giftedness had catapulted him to be the right hand of both Babylonian and Medo Persian kings - his name was Daniel.

When we stop to realize that Daniel was held in incredibly high esteem by this priestly caste the pieces of the puzzle fall into place. They would have the words of Daniel at their disposal, including some of the most significant Messianic prophecies of the Old Testament. (See Daniel 9:26) This would allow them not only to know that God was sending "Messiah the Prince", but also give them a good estimation of the time frame of His arrival.

How Did They Get There?

Matthew quotes them as saying "We have seen His star in the east and have come to worship Him." The term "star" (Greek "aster") can mean a star, or more broadly "a light source" or  "a shining forth". Some have tried to write this off as a comet, a super nova or a conjunction of planets, but the text tells us that this "shining forth" not only guided these Magi directionally from their capitol of Susa (some 500 miles away) but also showed them the specific position on the ground where they would find the King they sought. Astronomical objects cannot do this. But there is a phenomenon described in Scripture that guided the people of Israel across the trackless wilderness under Moses -

And the LORD went before them by day in a pillar of cloud to lead the way, and by night in a pillar of fire to give them light, so as to go by day and night. He did not take away the pillar of cloud by day or the pillar of fire by night from before the people. (Exodus 13:21-22)

Why Was Herod So Upset?

It is hard to imagine a jaded, Roman backed ruler like Herod getting agitated by three characters on camels. But history tells us that he had a run in with the Parthians some 40 years before. they had invaded Palestine and Herod had to flee for his life until the Romans beat back the assault. Imagine how he reacted when the ultimate power brokers of Parthia came on the scene, no doubt with a sufficient military escort to ensure their safety. The question, "Where is He Who is born King of the Jews (and we know it's not you, Herod)" packed quite a wallop.

Why Do We Assume There Were Three Kings?

The tradition arose from the presentation of three gifts, and grew so wildly that the Kings were associated with the three sons of Noah, Shem, Ham and Japheth, and even named - Caspar, Balthasaar and Melchior. Various cathedrals in Europe even claim to have the skulls or bones of these three in their keeping. There is no evidence to suggest that there were only three of them, and their identification as "Magi" eliminates the mini-United Nations delegation theory.

What Was the Significance of the Gifts?

The truth behind the presentation of the gifts is profound. Gold was considered a fitting gift for a King. Frankincense was associated with Temple offerings and so would be appropriate for a Priest. But the third gift was the most stunning - myrrh was commonly used to prepare bodies for burial after death. Could you imagine the look on Mary and Joseph's faces when they saw that one? It would be like going to a baby shower and giving the mother a jar of embalming fluid.

But the Magi were on to something. They not only had Daniel's writings, but also the writings that Daniel held dear to tell them about this promised King. Including Isaiah 53:7-11.

He was oppressed and He was afflicted,
      Yet He opened not His mouth;
      He was led as a lamb to the slaughter,
      And as a sheep before its shearers is silent,
      So He opened not His mouth.
      He was taken from prison and from judgment,
      And who will declare His generation?
      For He was cut off from the land of the living;
      For the transgressions of My people He was stricken.
        And they made His grave with the wicked—
      But with the rich at His death,
      Because He had done no violence,
      Nor was any deceit in His mouth.
        Yet it pleased the LORD to bruise Him;
      He has put Him to grief.
      When You make His soul an offering for sin,
      He shall see His seed, He shall prolong His days,
      And the pleasure of the LORD shall prosper in His hand.
        He shall see the labor of His soul, and be satisfied.
      By His knowledge My righteous Servant shall justify many,
      For He shall bear their iniquities.

Do you catch a note of irony here? When Jesus was born He was welcomed into our world by only a handful of shepherds. Where were the experts in the Law and the Prophets? The religious leaders of the day couldn't be bothered to walk 8 miles down the road from Jerusalem to Bethlehem to see what these crazy shepherds were going on about.

But if those who should have been ready and waiting would fall asleep at the switch, God would arrange a proper greeting for His Son. He would work across 500 years of history, and summon a group from 500 miles away to worship the King when he came.

Joy to the world.

The Lord has come.

Let earth receive her King.

Something that profound just can't be captured or contained in a plastic nativity scene!










Scott's Blog - 12/19/07

A Book By Its Cover?

There are certain passages in the Word of God that are probably truer than we would like them to be.

Oh, don't get me wrong, I'm not talking about degrees of inspiration.

All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness (II Timothy 3:16)

But there are some that are devastatingly true concerning their application, how they work out in our lives.

Consider this gem from the book of James:

My brethren, let not many of you become teachers, knowing that we shall receive a stricter judgment. (James 3:1)

The bottom line here is hard to miss. God takes His Word very seriously. And the moment we stand up and present ourselves as an authority on some aspect of His truth, we'd better know what we are talking about.

Because if we don't, there will be a moment when that will become painfully obvious to all.

Consider this eyebrow raising story that hit the web today.

Lynne Spears' Book Delayed Indefinitely

NEW YORK (AP) - Lynne Spears' book about parenting has been delayed indefinitely, her publisher said Wednesday.

Lindsey Nobles, a spokeswoman for Christian book publisher Thomas Nelson Inc., said Wednesday that the memoir by the mother of Britney Spears was put on hold last week. She declined to comment on whether the delay was connected to the revelation that Spears' 16-year-old daughter, Jamie Lynn, is pregnant.

"I can tell you that we are standing behind Lynne and supporting her decision to be with her family at this time," Nobles told The Associated Press.

"Pop Culture Mom: A Real Story of Fame and Family in a Tabloid World" was initially scheduled for release May 11, Mother's Day. Spears, the mother of three children with ex-husband Jamie Spears, had been working with a Michigan-based freelancer since March on the memoir chronicling Spears' experiences raising a family in the public eye.

Jamie Lynn Spears, star of Nickelodeon's "Zoey 101" and sister of Britney, told OK! magazine in its new issue that she's expecting her first child and the father is boyfriend Casey Aldridge.

Nobles and representatives for Britney Spears said they did not know how Lynne Spears could be reached for comment about the status of her book. http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8TKMPHG1&show_article=1

Britney Spears' mother is going to share tips on Christian parenting?

I can't pretend to know the challenges the Spears family has faced over the years.

I have no clue what it must be like to try to maintain a sense of normalcy, stability and spirituality when every move a family makes is fair game for the paparazzi and the tabloids.

I have no idea what caused the break up of Lynn Spears' marriage, or what attempts she may have made to help her daughters avoid making their lives into a public spectacle.

But I do know this.

Once Lynn spears signed on the line to write a nationally promoted book on the subject of Christian parenting, she assumed the mantle of being subject to "a stricter judgment".

And judged she will be.

The great undecideds of our culture will write her off as a member of the "Don't do as I do, do as I say" club.

The snarky cynics will use this as an opportunity to mock Biblical standards of parenting.

Even the most charitable will shake their heads and say, "Lynn, why don't you apply this in your own life before you try to sell it to others?"

A lesson lies here for all of us.

No one is perfect.

We all fall short of living up to the things we stand for.

But before we put ourselves forward as an expert in fixing the lives of others, we need to first experience some fixing of our own.

Jesus put it this way:

And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?  Or how can you say to your brother, ‘Let me remove the speck from your eye’; and look, a plank is in your own eye?  Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye. (Matthew 7:3-5)


 





Scott's Blog - 12/18/07

How Much Would You Pay For Peace?

A cynical comedian once observed that you can't buy love, but you can rent it.

The same sad equation seems to be in full force in the Middle East. The so-called "Road Map to Peace" seems to operate on one consistent principle.

The Israelis are required to make physical and strategic concessions to the Palestinians. Once a large chunk of territory or a policy designed to enhance Israeli security is abandoned, or conceded or dismantled, peace will be in the air for, oh, about a month until the next demand is made.

And the rent for a month's worth of "peace" is going up exponentially.

The going price now? The single most sacred site in all of Judaism - the Temple Mount.

FROM WND'S JERUSALEM BUREAU
Revealed: Israel agreed to forfeit Temple Mount
Documents detail ex-Israeli leader's deal handing Judaism's holiest site to Yasser Arafat

Posted: December 13, 2007
11:09 a.m. Eastern

By Aaron Klein
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com


Temple Mount
JERUSALEM – In spite of longstanding denials by top officials here, the Israeli government in 2000 agreed to relinquish the Temple Mount – Judaism's holiest site – to the Palestinians during U.S.-backed negotiations, according to declassified documents made public today.

The information comes as Prime Minister Ehud Olmert earlier this month denied talks started at November's Annapolis summit would lead to Israel giving up its sovereignty over the Temple Mount, while chief Palestinian negotiators tell WND the Jewish state already agreed to forfeit Judaism's holiest site to a coalition of Arab countries.

According to declassified Israeli government documents published today by Israel's Haaretz newspaper, during U.S.-led negotiations in 2000 at Camp David, Ehud Barak, then prime minister, agreed sovereignty over the Temple Mount would be either "ambiguous" or control would be determined based on the bond of each party to the site. The Palestinians would therefore control the upper sections of the Mount, which houses the Al Aqsa Mosque and also is the site of the First and Second Jewish Temples. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=59188

What does Biblical prophecy tell us about these shocking developments?

I believe the Scriptures tell us that any attempt to cede absolute control over the Temple Mount are bound to fail.

The current situation is a recipe for disaster, a very heavy lid over a boiling pot. Although annexed by Israel following the '67 War, Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan attempted to offer an olive branch to the Jordanians by allowing a group of Moslem clergy called the Waqf to oversee the site.

The Waqf has subsequently banned the presence of Bibles and any non Moslem prayer on the grounds. It routinely looks the other way when its followers rain down rocks on Jews praying at the Wailing Wall. It has also allowed supposed "public works projects" designed to eliminate any archeological artifacts that would support the Jews' claim that the Temple even existed.

Turning up the heat on the site is the rise to prominence of the Temple Mount Society, who are about the business of making preparations for the building of a new Temple on it's historic grounds. Various implements of worship have been completed and future priests and Levites are being trained at a seminary.

Where does all this end up?

Not in explosion, but in accommodation.

A fascinating view of the future of the Temple Mount is found in Revelation chapter eleven.

Then I was given a reed like a measuring rod. And the angel stood, saying, “Rise and measure the temple of God, the altar, and those who worship there.  But leave out the court which is outside the temple, and do not measure it, for it has been given to the Gentiles. And they will tread the holy city underfoot for forty-two months. And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy one thousand two hundred and sixty days, clothed in sackcloth.”(Revelation 11:1-3)

 The description here is of a divided Temple Mount, where the Jews will have to share the site with Gentiles. This was an unthinkable notion at the time that the majority of the New Testament was written.

Nowadays, not so much.

How will this uneasy coexistence come about?

Daniel chapter nine provides a clue.

Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
      But in the middle of the week
      He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.
      And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes desolate,
      Even until the consummation, which is determined,
      Is poured out on the desolate.” (Daniel 9:27)

The "he" in this passage is the Anti-Christ. He will wow the world by providing a solution to an unsolvable problem. The world will welcome him as a man of "peace and safety", until he reveals his true colors three and a half years after this apparent diplomatic triumph.

From that point onward the express elevator to Armaggedon will be open for business.

The stage is certainly being set.

Even the centerpiece of Jewish spiritual identity is up for barter. With strong pressure from the U.S. and the West, Israel's current weak leadership seems willing to sell their soul for even a promise of peace.

One day, perhaps soon, they will get the chance to complete the transaction.


 

 







Scott's Blog - 12/17/07

Here Comes the New Czar, Same As the Old Czar?

Students of Biblical prophecy are paying more and more attention to Ezekiel 38-39, the now famous section of scripture detailing a last days invasion of Israel.

Now the word of the LORD came to me, saying,  “Son of man, set your face against Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him,  and say, ‘Thus says the Lord GOD: “Behold, I am against you, O Gog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal.  I will turn you around, put hooks into your jaws, and lead you out, with all your army, horses, and horsemen, all splendidly clothed, a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords.  Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are with them, all of them with shield and helmet;  Gomer and all its troops; the house of Togarmah from the far north and all its troops—many people are with you.
 “Prepare yourself and be ready, you and all your companies that are gathered about you; and be a guard for them.  After many days you will be visited. In the latter years you will come into the land of those brought back from the sword and gathered from many people on the mountains of Israel, which had long been desolate; they were brought out of the nations, and now all of them dwell safely.  You will ascend, coming like a storm, covering the land like a cloud, you and all your troops and many peoples with you.” (Ezekiel 38:1-9)

It is not only significant to note that the land of Magog has been historically identified with the territory of modern Russia, but also that this prophecy is directed toward a single ruler over this country called "Gog".

The close association of the name of the ruler with the name of the country has lead to speculation that this individual would exercise almost unquestioned and unchecked power over his nation. In the case of Russia, it would require far more personal power than was exercised by any Soviet style premiere. Even powerful leaders like Kruschev or Gorbachev had to play politics with various factions of the Communist polituburo to accomplish their ends.

What is likely in view here is the rise of a leader with a grasp of unchecked autonomous power not seen since a czar like Peter the Great.

We may be seeing just such an individual power grab taking place in our day.

Putin to be PM in future Russia government

By Oleg Shchedrov Mon Dec 17, 11:09 AM ET

Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during a nationwide TV broadcast in Moscow November 29, 2007. (RIA-Novosti/Kremlin/Reuters)

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Monday he was ready to become prime minister if his close ally Dmitry Medvedev succeeds him, giving Putin a way to keep a grip on power after he leaves the Kremlin.

A 42-year-old lawyer with no political base of his own, Medvedev is virtually certain to win next March's presidential election since most Russians will vote for whoever the highly popular Putin endorses.

"If Russian citizens express their confidence in Dmitry Medvedev and elect him as the country's president, I will be ready to head the government," Putin told a congress of his United Russia party held near Moscow's Red Square.

"(We) shouldn't be ashamed or afraid of transferring the key powers of the country, the destiny of Russia to the hands of such a man," Putin added in his speech.

Medvedev, 42, was later adopted by the congress as United Russia's presidential candidate. Delegates voted 478-1 in a sober, Soviet-style ceremony held without debate.

In his brief acceptance speech, Medvedev listed priorities such as strengthening Russia's position in the world, preserving the Russian nation, looking after the young and the old.

"All this is in Vladimir Putin's strategy. I will be guided by this strategy, if I am elected president," Medvedev said.

"But carrying out an idea can only be successful with the participation of its author. I have no doubt that in the future Vladimir Vladimirovich (Putin) will use all his resources, all his influence in Russia and abroad for the benefit of Russia."

Putin signaled Medvedev, a first deputy prime minister and chairman of state gas giant Gazprom, last week as his preferred successor. The constitution bars Putin from a third term.

Analysts said the choice of a loyal longtime colleague signaled Putin's desire to keep a grip on power after leaving the Kremlin. The two men have worked together for 17 years.

Putin walked into the congress hall side by side with Medvedev to applause from the serried ranks of dark-suited delegates. Both men wore dark suits with white shirts and ties and stood to attention as participants sang the national anthem. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071217/ts_nm/russia_vote_putin_pm_dc_3

The long and the short of this is that if Medvedev wins the presidency, Putin gets a promotion. Medvedev will have the title of president, but Putin will have free reign to run the country.

In domestic policy, foreign affairs, even military decision making, the will of Putin and Russia will become synonymous.

Will Vlad Putin prove to be the predicted Russian leader of Ezekiel 38-39? Time will tell. But it is significant that the very governmental structure of Russia is being altered so that such a scenario could be easily realized in the near future.









Scott's Blog - 12/14/07

Forsaking All I Trust Him?

Does God want us to have faith in our faith? Is the act of claiming certain verses a way to write your own ticket with God? What is real faith all about? Check out our video blog - "Does Perfect Faith Produce Miracles" !







Scott's Blog - 12/13/07

Suffer the Children

In the smoking aftermath of the L.A. riots, Rodney King plaintively asked the nation a simple yet soul searching question - "Can't we all just get along?"

In no part of the world is this question more significant, and yet maddeningly elusive than the Middle East.

To hear the press tell it, if the mean old Israelis would just stop picking on the poor dispossessed Palestinians we could put out the fuse on World War III.

This trend has become so prevalent that you can even criticize Israel with your own personalized nativity scene this Christmas.

Nativity scene recast with security barrier for 'Kitschmas'


The walled nativity set, part of the 12 days of Kitschmas gift list


It's a familiar Christmas image: a few animals and some wise men gather in a barn to pay their respects to a newborn baby. But unlike the traditional nativity scene, there's a wooden wall separating the worshippers from the baby Jesus.

The walled nativity set, launched this week as part of a range of alternative Christmas gifts, is intended to be a reminder of the 230-mile, six-metre-high wall topped with barbed wire and lined with guard towers, that encircles the Palestinian land and Bethlehem.

The message, according to its manufacturers, the Amos Trust, is that in 2007 the wise men would not have made it to the stable. http://www.guardian.co.uk/christmas2007/story/0,,2225153,00.html

No doubt this snarky update on a traditional holiday theme is meant to be a conversation starter, so let's start the conversation. Why did the Israelis erect the 230 mile security wall?

To achieve a documented 90% reduction in suicide bomb attacks on innocent men, women and children.

But aren't the Palestinians interested in pursuing peace with Israel?

It depends on which Palestinians you talk to. After being given the bum's rush out of Gaza, Mahmoud Abbas' Fatah Party is willing to put on a show for Western consumption in Annapolis. When the majority of your own people want to kill you, it's a good idea to find any port in a storm. And if you can give the American president a nice photo op, and collect a few million dollars more of foreign aide money in the process, why not shake hands with your sworn enemy?

But back in Gaza, things are not so subtle. There, the democratically elected government in Gaza, the terrorist group Hamas, hasn't changed their tune - or even their children's programming.

Boy: My beloved brothers, as you know, today the Al-Aqsa Mosque is crying out: “Where is the people of the frontline, the Palestinian people?” Yes, my dear brothers, that is the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The subject of our lesson today is Jerusalem, to where your Prophet made his nocturnal journey – the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Yes, my beloved brothers, as you know today, and as you have known yesterday and the day before, the Al-Aqsa Mosque has fallen into oppressing and malicious hands, the hands of those who know nothing but injustice. But let me tell you how the Al-Aqsa Mosque will be returned, how we shall rescue it from the shackles of the occupation, from the shackles of the Zionist entity. Will it be through conferences? No, not through conferences, but by means of force, because the Zionist entity, your enemy, the enemy of Allah, the enemy of Islam, knows nothing but injustice and the killing of Palestinians, the persevering people on the frontline. Indeed, the [mosque] will be returned only by means of force. In 1917, the Balfour Declaration was issued. Balfour decided on the cleansing of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. But look what the Zionist enemy has done, look what Israel and America have done. Look what the allies of Israel and America have done. They have dug tunnels underneath the Al-Aqsa Mosque, but the sheiks and mujahideen of the Al-Aqsa Mosque have exposed these tunnels and called upon the Palestinian people: “Look what has happened, look what has happened.” These calls have gone unheeded, my beloved brothers. But is it too late? No, it is not too late. If we all unite, the Al-Aqsa Mosque will not remain in the hands of the Zionist enemy, it will not remain in the hands of your enemy, despite all their conspiracies against the Palestinian people.

[...]

Girl: To Al-Aqsa, to Al-Aqsa – we shall unite our ranks. We will wipe out the people of Zion, and will not leave a single one of them.

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=28260&only&rss

 

Israel continues to offer concession after concession, but it's hard to negotiate with a partner who has defined "peace" as what will happen the day after your extermination.

A "partner" who has no qualms about leading their children to spout rhetoric that Hitler's Brown Shirts might find over the top.

I wonder how those who believe that all of the problems in the Middle East fall in Israel's lap would feel if a terrorist government set up shop across the border from our country and started lobbing Katyusha rockets into our major cities. I'm sure we would be aghast if the UN demanded we remove our border patrol and give up San Diego to this group as a good faith gesture.

So I will not be celebrating Christmas with a painfully unfunny knock off of a nativity scene.

Or by buying my children a DVD of "The Best of Hamas' Hate-fest for Kiddies"

But I will take time to pray.

Pray for the peace of Jerusalem:
         “May they prosper who love you.

 Peace be within your walls,
         Prosperity within your palaces.” (Psalm 125:6-7)









Scott's Blog - 12/12/07

Confronting the "Cultural Christian"

It has been said that the loneliest moment in the life of an atheist is when he feels genuinely thankful and has no one to thank.

If this is true, then the runner up must be the Christmas season.

Just look at what this time of year does to even the most hard bitten anti-theists among us.

Atheist Dawkins Calls Himself a 'Cultural Christian'



Richard Dawkins lecturing on his book, The God Delusion.

Staunch atheist Richard Dawkins recently denied wanting to stop Christian traditions as he labeled himself a “cultural Christian.”

"This is historically a Christian country. I'm a cultural Christian in the same way many of my friends call themselves cultural Jews or cultural Muslims,” Oxford biologist Dawkins said on BBC’s recent “Have Your Say” program.

Dawkins, who has expressed hopes of converting religious believers to atheism through his international bestseller The God Delusion, made the comments while fielding open questions on religion and debating with conservative MP Mark Pritchard.

“I like singing carols along with everybody else. I'm not one of those who wants to purge our society of our Christian history,” he said.

"If there's any threat these sorts of things, I think you will find it comes from rival religions and not from atheists," said Dawkins.

Dawkins has credited his exposure to Darwinism as the turning point from his Anglican upbringing to atheism. He is part of a new breed of outspoken atheists who are publicly rejecting the existence of God. Dawkins is also urging other atheists to come out of the closet and declare themselves publicly through his Out Campaign. http://www.christianpost.com/article/20071211/30445_Atheist_Dawkins_Calls_Himself_a_%27Cultural_Christian%27.htm

I have to confess I feel a certain amount of sympathy for Richard Dawkins. Before I became a Christian I considered myself an atheist. Yet there was something irresistibly warm and inviting about joining in for a chorus of "Silent Night", "The First Noel" or even "Hark! The Herald Angels Sing".

But I must confess I paid very little attention to the words I was singing.

It is tough for a person who denies that God exists to feel good while declaring:

Hark the herald angels sing
"Glory to the newborn King!
Peace on earth and mercy mild
God and sinners reconciled"
Joyful, all ye nations rise
Join the triumph of the skies
With the angelic host proclaim:
"Christ is born in Bethlehem"
Hark! The herald angels sing
"Glory to the newborn King!"

Christ by highest heav'n adored
Christ the everlasting Lord!
Late in time behold Him come
Offspring of a Virgin's womb
Veiled in flesh the Godhead see
Hail the incarnate Deity
Pleased as man with man to dwell
Jesus, our Emmanuel
Hark! The herald angels sing
"Glory to the newborn King!"

Hail the heav'n-born Prince of Peace!
Hail the Son of Righteousness!
Light and life to all He brings
Ris'n with healing in His wings
Mild He lays His glory by
Born that man no more may die
Born to raise the sons of earth
Born to give them second birth
Hark! The herald angels sing
"Glory to the newborn King!"

"Hark! The Herald Angels Sing" is many things, but subtle isn't one of them. It openly declares that there is not only a true and living God, but that He has walked among us in the Person of Jesus Christ.

In light of these lyrics,  it is shocking that Richard Dawkins, a man who has likened teaching children about Jesus to child abuse, would be able to sing such a song without becoming physically ill, let alone enjoy doing so.

It would be like a Bible believing Christian enjoying getting together with friends for a sing along of John Lennon's "Imagine" or the Rolling Stones' "Sympathy For the Devil".

Once again we see that the old adage is true, "Atheism lies in the lip, not in the heart of men."

We also see that Christmas time can soften even the hearts of the most God rejecting among us. There are few more potentially productive opportunities for personal evangelism than this time of year.

We need to give thought to how we can make the most of this opportunity.

Is there a friend or neighbor we could invite out to a Christmas Eve service?

Could we get a group of Christian friends together to Christmas carol in our neighborhoods with perhaps a word or two about the real reason for the season thrown in?

Can we show God's love tangibly by reaching out to a hurting or less fortunate family?

Could we visit a nursing home and replace the loneliness many feel this time of year with the love of Jesus?

You get the idea.

Normally our culture goes out of its way to shut down any sign of God's truth. Here comes the great exception to the rule. If this time of year is so powerful that an angry atheist like Richard Dawkins is singing Christmas carols, let's seize the moment and share the love of Jesus!

See then that you walk circumspectly, not as fools but as wise, redeeming the time, because the days are evil.
Therefore do not be unwise, but understand what the will of the Lord is. (Ephesians 5:14-17)

 






Scott's Blog - 12/11/07

If You Think Education Is Expensive...

As a product of the American educational system I have to admit I have had the dubious pleasure of sitting through some pretty silly lectures.

I can recall my college philosophy class where the professor took good time to explain to us that matter didn't exist. The talk came to a screeching halt when a football player (who had close personal experience with matter in large quantities) told the instructor to go play on the freeway and prove it.

I can recall a speech teacher warning of the dangers of nervous habits creeping into a presentation while obsessively jangling the keys in his pocket.

But one of the silliest things I can recall coming from the mind of a professional educator made it to Yahoo News this morning.

Historian: First English Bible Fueled First Fundamentalists

The translation of the Bible into English marked the birth of religious fundamentalism in medieval times, as well as the persecution that often comes with radical adherence in any era, according to a new book.

The 16th-century English Reformation, the historic period during which the Scriptures first became widely available in a common tongue, is often hailed by scholars as a moment of liberation for the general public, as it no longer needed to rely solely on the clergy to interpret the verses.

But being able to read the sometimes frightening set of moral codes spelled out in the Bible scared many literate Englishmen into following it to the letter, said James Simpson, a professor of English at Harvard University.

"Reading became a tightrope of terror across an abyss of predestination," said Simpson, author of "Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and its Reformation Opponents" (Harvard University Press, 2007).

"It was destructive for [Protestants], because it did not invite freedom but rather fear of misinterpretation and damnation," Simpson said. http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20071211/sc_livescience/historianfirstenglishbiblefueledfirstfundamentalists#

The essence of Dr. Simpson's scholarly analysis? Providing the Bible to people in their own language was a bad thing.

Why?

Because they could read it for themselves.

They didn't have to take the word of an often dead and corrupt clergy when it came to discovering what the Bible said about life, death and the afterlife.

They would not only go to church, but like the Berean believers of Acts 17:11 "search the Scriptures daily to see if these things were really so."

And, believing that the Bible wasn't merely a collection of quaint myths, or a spiritual ink blot test that one could fold, spindle and mutilate to confirm one's own prejudices, they took "rightly dividing the Word of truth" (II Timothy 2:15) as a matter of life or death.

And, horror of horrors, many attempted to actually live out the truths they found in the Scripture in their daily lives.

And this was bad, because, well, Dr. Simpson doesn't like the message.

And so he brands the notion of personally reading and applying the Scriptures as if they were the actual Word of God with the most vicious put down label available today - "Fundamentalism".

What goes through your mind when you hear that word? Visions of hijacked airplanes and suicide bombers go dancing through our heads.

It wasn't always so.

In fact the term  "Fundamentalist" originally came from a source that just might surprise you.

The original formulation of American fundamentalist beliefs can be traced to the Niagara Bible Conference (1878–1897) and, in 1910, to the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church which distilled these into what became known as the "five fundamentals":[1]

  • Inerrancy of the Scriptures
  • The virgin birth and the deity of Jesus (Isaiah 7:14)
  • The doctrine of substitutionary atonement through God's grace and human faith (Hebrews 9)
  • The bodily resurrection of Jesus (Matthew 28)
  • The authenticity of Christ's miracles 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalist_Christianity

Simpson's not so subtle point is that Islamic "fundamentalism" has arisen from the same poisoned well as Christian fundamentalism. A culture that is largely illiterate suddenly finds spiritual information available to the common man. The common man, bereft of the guidance of the benevolent  intelligensia, takes spiritual things too seriously and mayhem results.

You see, Islamofascists like Osama bin Laden who believe that Allah will reward them for conquering the infidel are really no different than believers like Tyndale, or Luther or Billy Graham for that matter.

The problem with Dr. Simpson's analysis isn't hard to spot. The fundamentals of faith in Christ are light years apart from the teachings of the Quran and the Haddiths.

Nowhere do we see a command to "greet the infidel with the edge of the sword" in the New Testament. Instead, we see a call to allow the light and love of Jesus shine in a dark world.

Do all things without complaining and disputing, that you may become blameless and harmless, children of God without fault in the midst of a crooked and perverse generation, among whom you shine as lights in the world, holding fast the word of life, so that I may rejoice in the day of Christ that I have not run in vain or labored in vain. (Philippians 2:14-16)

There is no doubt a fundamental difference between Christianity and Islam. This tortured attempt at the same tired argument of moral equivalency simply doesn't pass the test of even basic historical or spiritual analysis.

You would think that an educator would be the first to agree with the simple premise that more information is better than less. Emblazed across the bumpers of many cars I have seen in university faculty parking lots are the words "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance."

In Dr. Simpson's twisted vision, western civilization would have been better off if the Bible continued to be a banned book, available only to the select few.

How ironic that we now have an educator telling us that ignorance has now become a virtue, and knowledge, especially spiritual knowledge, is a dangerous thing.

 


 








Scott's Blog - 12/10/07

Ready To Go?

Every now and then I am asked the question, "Do you believe the church will experience persecution before the rapture?"

The simple answer is, we already do.

In a global sense, persecution is doing land office business.

Due to the rise of Communism and fascism, the last century saw more believers die for faith in Christ than in all the previous years since the time of Christ combined.

Now with the revival of Islamic extremism, being a believer in Iran, Saudi Arabia or the Sudan is a very dangerous business.

The reason we tend to ask questions about persecution being a future possibility is that believers in the United States have lived out an exception to the rule. We have the right to practice our faith built into our Constitution. We tend to define persecution as enduring an insult because we have a fish on the back of our car, or getting passed over for a promotion because we don't laugh at the boss's dirty jokes.

But although government mandated, authority figure enforced persecution still seems a way off in our culture, the job appears to be taken over by "the private sector".

Police: Same Gunman Attacked Both Churches

Police Say Forensics Link Murray To Arvada, Colorado Springs

The violence began about 12:30 a.m. Sunday, when a man pulled a handgun and opened fire at the Youth With A Mission center after he had been denied a request to spend the night there. Witnesses told police that the gunman was a white man in his early 20s, wearing a dark jacket and skull cap and carrying a handgun.

More than 12 hours later, at New Life Church in Colorado Springs, a gunman wearing a trench coat and carrying a high-powered rifle opened fire in the parking lot and then walked into the church as a service was letting out, Colorado Springs Police Chief Richard Myers said.

Police said he tossed a smoke grenade at the north entrance of the church, just as Sunday services was ending, and then drove the short way to the east entrance to the church.

In the east entrance parking lot, he fired several rounds in the parking lot, hitting four people and multiple vehicles, police said.

Jessie Gingrich had left New Life and was in the parking lot getting into her car when she saw the gunman get a rifle from his trunk and open fire on a van full of people.

"A man got out of his car and pulled out a huge rifle and my first thought was, 'That can't be a real gun,' and he started shooting," said Gingrich. "I was absolutely positive that I was going to be next."

She said she then cowered in her car, fumbling with the ignition key.

"I was just expecting for the next gunshot to be coming through my car. Miraculously -- by the grace of God -- it did not," she told ABC's "Good Morning America." "I believe the only reason I got away was because he had to stop and reload his gun."
http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/14810359/detail.html

If not for the nearly supernatural courage of security guard Jeanne Assam, the gun man identified as Matthew Murray, armed with two hand guns, an assault rifle and over 1,000 rounds of ammunition, could have killed hundreds.

Murray's  motivation? According to a spokesman for the Colorado Springs Police Department, "He hated Christians."

So how do we respond to a senseless act of violence perpetrated against innocent people whose only crime was wanting to serve the Lord as missionaries or attending church on Sunday morning?

Churches are revisiting their security plans. Some are considering making it mandatory that at least one usher be armed and capable of responding to a similar situation.

But what does this unimaginable set of circumstances say to us as believers?

A few things.

First, persecution can come in many forms. Sometimes it happens because evil men make believing in Christ against the law of the land. But as we have seen, it can also happen because an unstable personality decides to commit an act against the law of the land.

Either way, people end up dying for their faith in Christ.

Some times, as in the Sudan, it is expected. There is time to count the cost and brace for impact.

Other times, as in Colorado Springs, it is the last thing that could be anticipated. But the dull glaze of shock and disbelief doesn't make the incident any less real.

But the biggest question is, does our relationship with Jesus mean enough to us that we are willing to stand for Him even if it costs us our own lives?

This is no longer a question that we as Christians in the United States can keep at arms length because persecution is something that happens "way over there" in a country with a name we can barely pronounce or find on a map. If Columbine and now Colorado Springs have taught us anything it can happen right here, right now.

If going to church suddenly became dangerous, would we continue to go?

If having a Christian fish on the back of our cars made us a target, would we remove them?

If sharing our faith became hazardous to our health would we tell anyone what God has done for us?

Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me. 25 For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it. (Matthew 16:24-25)







Scott's Blog - 12/07/07

Is It Really Possible to Know God Personally?

The Apostle John wrote that it is just as possible for us to know Jesus as it was for the disciples who saw Him face to face.

That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life— the life was manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you that eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us—  that which we have seen and heard we declare to you, that you also may have fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ.  And these things we write to you that your joy may be full. (I John 1:1-4)

So how can we experience this kind of spiritual fellowship with Jesus? Check out our video blog - "How Close can We Get to God?" !


You'll never look at prayer the same way again.









Scott's Blog - 12/06/07

Some Coal For Your Christmas Stocking

Remember that cheery little holiday number that told us "It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas"?

Well, the tell tale signs certainly have changed over the years. As children we used to look for the Sears Christmas Catalog to roll in sometime around Thanksgiving. Now, the call to "Buy now and worry about it later!" goes out about a week before Halloween.

It used to be that the biggest potential problems of the Christmas season were over spending, over eating and getting so caught up in the mad social whirl that we ran the risk of forgetting "the reason for the season".

Not any more.

Now, thanks to New Line Cinema, we can include an all out assault on God Himself as part of our "holiday" experience - "The Golden Compass".



I was given a heads up about this film in an unusual way. I received a forwarded e-mail that issued this warning.

Subject: Bad movie coming out in December--beware!

You may already know about this, but I just learned about a kids movie coming out in December starring Nicole Kidman. It's called The Golden Compass, and while it will be a watered down version, it is based on a series of children's books about killing God (It is the anti-Narnia). Please follow this link, and then pass it on. From what I understand, the hope is to get a lot of kids to see the movie - which won't seem too bad - and then get the parents to buy the books for their kids for Christmas. The quotes from the author sum it all up. I'm going to tell everyone about this movie.


Now, normally, I don't tend to take e-mails like this seriously. But I have been asked about the movie on Scott Richards Live and so I decided to do some digging.

The notion that a movie would be produced running on the theme of "killing God" sounded so over the top, I went to Snopes.com, a web site that specializes in debunking urban legends. I was shocked at what I found.

The Golden Compass, a fantasy film starring Nicole Kidman that is scheduled to be released into theaters on 7 December 2007, has been drawing fire from concerned Christians. The film is based on Northern Lights (released in the U.S. as The Golden Compass), the first offering in Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials trilogy of children's books, a series that follows the adventures of a streetwise girl who travels through multiple worlds populated by witches, armor-plated bears, and sinister ecclesiastical assassins to defeat the oppressive forces of a senile God.

Books of the trilogy have sold more than 15 million copies around the world, with Northern Lights winning the Carnegie Medal for Children's Literature in 1995 and in 2007 being awarded the 'Carnegie of Carnegies' for the best children's book of the past 70 years. The Amber Spyglass, the final book of the series, won The Whitbread Prize in 2001, making it the first children's book to do so.

The series' author, Philip Pullman, is an avowed atheist who has averred that "I don't profess any religion; I don't think it's possible that there is a God; I have the greatest difficulty in understanding what is meant by the words 'spiritual' or 'spirituality.'" Critics of Pullman's books point to the strong anti-religion and anti-God themes they incorporate, and although literary works are subject to a variety of interpretations, Pullman left little doubt about his intentions when he said in a 2003 interview with The Sydney Morning Herald that "My books are about killing God." (Conservative British columnist Peter Hitchens labeled Pullman "The Most Dangerous Author in Britain" and described him as the writer "the atheists would have been praying for, if atheists prayed.")

Bill Donohue, president of The Catholic League, has condemned The Golden Compass as a "pernicious" effort to indoctrinate children into anti-Christian beliefs and has produced a 23-page pamphlet titled The Golden Compass: Unmasked in which he maintains that Pullman "sells atheism for kids." Donohoe told interviewer John Gibson on 9 October 2007 why he believes Christians should stay away from the film:
Look, the movie is based on the least offensive of the three books. And they have dumbed down the worst elements in the movie because they don't want to make Christians angry and they want to make money. Our concern is this, unsuspecting Christian parents may want to take their kid to the movie, it opens up December 7th and say, this wasn't troubling, then we'll buy the books. So the movie is the bait for the books which are profoundly anti-Catholic and at the same time selling atheism.
Other reviewers, however, have described Pullman's works as being more generally anti-religion rather than specifically anti-Christian or anti-Catholic:
In "His Dark Materials," Pullman's criticisms of organized religion come across as anti-authoritarian and anti-ascetic rather than anti-doctrinal. (Jesus isn't mentioned in any of the books, although Pullman has hinted that He might figure in a forthcoming sequel, "The Book of Dust.") His fundamental objection is to ideological tyranny and the rejection of this world in favor of an idealized afterlife, regardless of creed. As one of the novel's pagan characters puts it, "Every church is the same: control, destroy, obliterate every good feeling." http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/compass.asp


So what is the Christian response to this not so subtle piece of anti-God propaganda? I believe we get solid direction in the book of Ephesians.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret. But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light. Therefore He says:


      “ Awake, you who sleep,
      Arise from the dead,
      And Christ will give you light.” (Ephesians 5:12-14)

First, we are to have no fellowship with something like this.

Interestingly, plans to complete the "His Dark Materials" trilogy depend upon the financial success of "The Golden Compass".

I have never advocated organized boycotts of films,(which only seem to stoke the box office of real turkeys like "The Last Temptation of Christ") but personally I would not put a cent in the coffers of New Line Cinema or Phillip Pullman.

If you want to find out what the movie is about so you can discuss it intelligently, simply visit an internet synopsis site like: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/His_Dark_Materials:_The_Golden_Compass

An insightful interview that reveals the confused philosophy of Phillip Pullman is also found at http://www.thirdway.org.uk/past/showpage.asp?page=3949

Second, we need to expose this kind of twisted melding of atheism and the occult to the light. Consider this interesting quote from Pullman:

In The Amber Spyglass, Mary Malone tells Lyra and Will that the Christian religion is a very powerful and convincing mistake. Is that your opinion?

I think I’d agree with her, yes.


What do you find powerful and convincing about it?

It’s a very good story. It gives an account of the world and what we’re doing here that is intellectually coherent and explains a great deal. But then so do other stories. The Gnostic myth, for example, explains a great deal in a very different way. Very different.

The Christian story gives us human beings a very important and prominent part. We are the ones who Jesus came to redeem from the consequences of sin, which our parents – you know. It is a very dramatic story and we are right at the heart of it, and a great deal depends on what we decide. This is an exciting position to be in, but unfortunately it doesn’t gel at all with the more convincing account that is given by Darwinian evolution – and the scientific account is far more persuasive intellectually. Far more persuasive.

And, as I have said, there is another consequence of any belief in a single god, and that is that it is a very good excuse for people to behave very badly.

http://www.thirdway.org.uk/past/showpage.asp?page=3949

My question to those who find Pullman convincing is simple - Why do you believe the speculations of men, rather than face the historical facts surrounding the life, death and resurrection of Jesus? What if Jesus is more than "just a good story"? Wouldn't that change everything?

The Golden compass will no doubt serve as a sort of literary "gateway drug" for many to buy into Pullmans half anti-theism/ half occultic world view. The Golden Compass goes into wide release beginning tomorrow. We need to be prepared to meet these distortions with the light and love of God's truth.

UPDATE: For an insightful critique of the movie version of  The Golden Compass check out http://live.hollywoodjesus.com/?p=1180

 








Scott's Blog - 12/5/07

Instant Access

It has been said that the higher one goes in an organization, the more difficult it is to get in touch with them.

I have attended conferences supposedly designed to allow up and coming leaders to benefit from close personal interaction with "heavy hitters" in Christian circles.
I soon discovered that each of these legendary spiritual luminaries were insulated by several layers of personal assistants. If you wanted time with the "great men", you had to show your worth by properly schmoozing up to the anointed gate keepers of personal access.

And this was at a conference when these Christian celebrities were supposedly at their most accessible!

If this is true at a Christian leadership conference, imagine the barriers locked in place in the realms of political power? If you or I were to place a person to person phone call to the head resident at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC, what would our chances be of getting through?

Slim and none.

Unless, of course your name happens to be Jenna Bush.

The amazing power of relationship to provide instant access was remarkably on display on today's episode of the Ellen DeGeneres television talk show.

On a publicity tour to promote her new book, Jenna Bush was asked by Ellen DeGeneres,  "How easy is it to call home?"


http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/index.php?cl=5327413

Stop and think about it. If you or I had somehow gotten as far as even the secretary who answered, the next sound we would hear would be the Secret Service agents bashing down our front door.

But Jenna not only got through, she talked with her mom, the First Lady.

Who then handed the phone over to the most powerful man in the world.

Who gladly took the call.

Relationship is the surest way to instant access, no matter how powerful the person might be.

Did you ever stop to realize that the very same thing is true in our walk with God?

The Bible tells us that when we put our trust in Jesus as our savior, we enter in to a remarkable level of relationship with the most powerful Person in the universe.

Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! (I John 3:1)

Because of this relationship we have unprecedented access to our Heavenly Father.

Therefore, brethren, having boldness to enter the Holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way which He consecrated for us, through the veil, that is, His flesh, and having a High Priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. (Hebrews 10:19-22)

The exciting truth is that as Christians we aren't merely God's distant admirers, or those who know a few spiritual truths about Him intellectually. We are welcomed into His forever family as dearly loved sons and daughters.

And with that love comes access.

Access before the throne of the Almighty, Who loves to hear from His children!

Why not take a moment and take advantage of that instant access right now?







Scott's Blog - 12/4/07

Are We Out of the Woods Yet?

When I was back in high school I remember hearing a popular comedy album called "Everything You Know Is Wrong".

I couldn't help but have that mind bending title run through my mind when I read of the release of the latest National Intelligence Estimate concerning Iran's drive for a nuclear weapon.

The U.S. national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, addressed the media Monday on the findings on the nuclear program of Iran. (Lawrence Jackson/The Associated Press)

U.S. report says Iran halted nuclear weapons program in 2003

WASHINGTON: A new assessment by American intelligence agencies made public Monday concludes that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 and that the program remains on hold, contradicting an assessment two years ago that Tehran was working inexorably toward building a bomb.

The report seems likely to weaken international support for tougher sanctions against Iran and raise new questions about the credibility of the beleaguered American intelligence agencies, while reshaping the final year of the Bush administration, which has made halting Iran's nuclear program a cornerstone of its foreign policy.

The assessment, a National Intelligence Estimate that represents the consensus view of all 16 American spy agencies, states that Tehran is most likely keeping its options open with respect to building a weapon, but that intelligence agencies "do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons." http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/03/america/cia.php

Many are reacting to this with one massive sigh of relief.

Others aren't so certain we have stepped back from the brink.

How should reasonable people assess this situation?

Joel Rosenberg offers this analysis:

Question: Is this intelligence assessment correct? Maybe. And let's hope so. It would be wonderful if Iran is not the steadily worrisome nuclear threat that U.S. intelligence agencies have been saying they were right up to this week....But there is always the possibility that the U.S. assessment is wrong. The accuracy of some of our intelligence reports in the Middle East have certainly been in question in recent years....And we must always remember May 1998, when India and Pakistan conducted multiple nuclear weapons tests, stunning U.S. and Western intelligence agencies who had absolutely no idea either country was so close to getting the Bomb....Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), then the Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, called this a "colossal failure" of the U.S. intelligence community....(see CNN: "CIA caught off guard on India nuclear test." and George Washington University national security archive of declassified documents: "U.S. Intelligence and the Indian Bomb: Documents Show U.S. Intelligence Failed to Warn of India's Nuclear Tests Despite Tracking Nuclear Weapons Potential Since 1950s."....God forbid we should have a similar such failure with regards to Iran.... http://joelrosenberg.blogspot.com/

Israel isn't ready to declare "peace in our time" just yet either.

The threat of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons must not be underestimated, was the message government officials sent out on Tuesday after the release of a US intelligence report claiming that Teheran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 but was continuing to enrich uranium.

Defense Minister Ehud Barak said that he was familiar with the report that had been shown to him by US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates during the Annapolis peace summit last week.

 

Ehud Barak

"I am familiar with the American intelligence assessment," Barak said following a meeting with Hungarian Chief of Staff Gen. Andras Havril. "Nevertheless, I say again that Iran is today a central threat on the world and the State of Israel."

He said that the world and Israel needed to take steps to confront the threat and to thwart it.

"There is a lot that can be done with regard to the Iranian nuclear program but it is important to mention that words do not stop missiles," the defense minister said. "Action is needed in the form of sanctions, in the diplomatic sphere and in other spheres as well."

Last month, Barak said that a military operation was a viable option for dealing with the Iranian nuclear threat.

"We cannot take any option off the table and we need to study operational aspects," Barak said at a Labor Party meeting in Beersheba. "This is not just for the coming months but also for the coming two years." http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1195546799748&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter

So where does this leave us from a Biblical point of view?

It is clear from passages like Ezekiel 38:5 that Iran will be a leading ally of Russia in the ill fated invasion of Israel known as the War of Gog and Magog. Whether she possesses nuclear weapons at the time of the engagement is simply not stated. It appears that this battle will be fought on conventional terms, until God intervenes supernaturally to put a stop to it.

The point that is not to be missed in days of clashing and confusing claims and counterclaims is this - Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejhad has vowed that Iran will "wipe Israel off the map".

Whether there is an attempt by Iran to do in six minutes what it took Hitler six years to accomplish, to wipe out six million Jews prior to the move of this Russian alliance is not revealed in Scripture.

Iran may lack the nuclear technology to decimate Israel, but the hatred to fuel such a venture is clearly in place.

And that hatred, driven by false prophecies of a Moslem Messiah is something the West should never underestimate.

But concerning the times and the seasons, brethren, you have no need that I should write to you.  For you yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the night.  For when they say, “Peace and safety!” then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant woman. And they shall not escape. (I Thessalonians 5:1-3)

 







Scott's Blog - 12/3/07

Next Year..In Moscow?

At the end of each celebration of the Passover Seder, Jews down through time have concluded with the classic closing words of hope, "Next year in Jerusalem!"

If Vladimir Putin has his way, there will be a slight variation on that theme - "Next year in Moscow!"



Nations United Against Israel

Russia: We've got Israel next

Source: The Jerusalem Post
December 03, 2007

Just as it did after the Madrid conference, which it co-hosted with the United States in 1991, Russia moved quickly last week to ensure that it will be in line to host the first post-Annapolis conference.

This is according to an official at the Russian embassy in Washington DC.

While a date for the follow up event was not yet set, the official said he believes that Moscow will ensure an ongoing leading role in developments by hosting talks that will "cover all the tracks" relating to a conclusive Israel-Arab peace agreement.

Russia is currently in the throes of an election that is believed rigged to ensure Vladimir Putin's party is returned to power with an overwhelming majority.

Putin himself is thought to be eyeing some form of power position that will enable him to keep his hands firmly on the reins of the Russian bear. http://www.jnewswire.com/article/2251

Since this story crossed the wires, an ominous series of developments has transpired in Russia.

art.putin.tehran.afp.gi.jpg

Putin, right, is greeted by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad following his arrival in Tehran.

 

Putin brushes off criticism over elections

By Neil Buckley and Catherine Belton in Moscow

Vladimir Putin has brushed off unprecedented international criticism of Russia’s parliamentary elections.

The Russian president said the elections on Sunday were legitimate in spite of widespread complaints of abuses and claims that the polls were unfair and deeply flawed.

 Germany said that “measured by our standards, it was neither a free, fair nor democratic election”, while the British foreign ministry called on Russia’s central election commission to “urgently investigate all allegations of electoral abuses”.

European election observers said there had been “frequent abuse of administrative re-sources, media coverage strongly in favour of the ruling party and an election code whose cumulative effect hindered political pluralism”.

But Mr Putin said the 64.1 per cent victory for the pro-Kremlin United Russia party – whose ticket he headed – was a signal of trust. “It’s now clear to me that Russians will never allow their country to develop along the destructive path seen in some other countries of the former Soviet Union,” he said.

 The result is expected to provide a platform for Mr Putin to remain Russia’s most influential politician while complying with a constitutional bar on more than two consecutive presidential terms by stepping down next year. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/23eb2d80-a1e6-11dc-a13b-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1

At our Scott Richards Live - Alive! event last Friday, special guest Joel Rosenberg http://joelrosenberg.blogspot.com/ went into detail about the prophesied last days invasion of Israel called the War of Gog and Magog.

In Ezekiel 38-39,  we see predicted the rise of a modern day czar in Russia who will head up a coalition of nations bent on destroying Israel. At his side in this venture will be an unprecedented ally, Persia, or modern Iran.

Historically, Russia and Iran have never had any kind of alliance.

But now all that has changed.

Russia supplies Iran with not only the materials and expertise necessary for her nuclear programs, but also sophisticated missile technology to defend it. Any attempt at meaningful economic sanctions against Iran is vetoed by Russia at the UN.

Why have these nations become such strange bed fellows in our day? Consider these ominously on target words God speaks to the head of this future coalition.

I will turn you around, put hooks into your jaws, and lead you out, with all your army, horses, and horsemen, all splendidly clothed, a great company with bucklers and shields, all of them handling swords.  Persia, Ethiopia, and Libya are with them, all of them with shield and helmet;  Gomer and all its troops; the house of Togarmah from the far north and all its troops—many people are with you. (Ezekiel 38:4-6)

The image here is graphic. Russia is dragged into leading this conflict painfully, against her will - with hooks in her jaws.

What kind of pain has pushed Russia under Putin into an increasingly cozy alliance with the radical Islamic leadership of Iran?

Consider this possibility.

It was not too long ago that Russia was saddled with it's own burden in the global war on terror. Islamic fundamentalists in the breakaway former Soviet Republic of Chechnya were not only fighting the Russians, but striking increasingly savage blows.

Beslan school hostage crisis

Beslan school hostage crisis
Photos of the victims on the walls of the former SNO

The Beslan school hostage crisis (also referred to as the Beslan school siege or Beslan massacre) began when a group of armed Chechen separatists and supporters took more than 1,200 schoolchildren and adults hostage on September 1, 2004, at School Number One (SNO) in the town of Beslan, North Ossetia-Alania, (an autonomous republic in the North Caucasus region of the Russian Federation). On the third day of the standoff, a chaotic gunbattle broke out between the hostage-takers and Russian security forces. Three hundred and thirty-four (334) civilians were killed,[1] including 186 children,[2] and hundreds more were wounded. Chechen terrorist Shamil Basayev took responsibility for the hostage taking.

The Beslan tragedy was merely a battle in a terror campaign that included everything from assassinations, sub way bombings, and the simultaneous explosion of two Russian airliners in mid flight.

Yet since 2006, the number of incidents with Islamist Chechen rebels has mysteriously dropped to almost zero.

And, interestingly, the unqualified support for the mad mullahs in Tehran has risen to new heights.

Putin has placed support of Iran's drive toward becoming a nuclear power even ahead of good relations with the United States and the European Union.

Why?

Putin is no fool. He knows that the southern border of his loosely connected Russian Federation, from Georgia to Siberia, is dominated by Shiite Moslems.

How can he most effectively keep Kazakhs and Azerbijanis and Uzbecks from following in the footsteps of their Chechen brethren? By identifying with them against a common foe - an enemy that Shiite Moslems feel a religious obligation to wipe off the face of the earth - Israel.

And the strategy appears to be working.

As Joel Rosenberg suggested at our gathering on Friday night, what would happen if the Russians and Iranians decided to follow the lead of the United States approach to the weapons of mass destruction problem in Iraq?

What if they used the United Nations as a platform to declare the entire Middle East a "nuclear free zone" and then demanded that Israel disarm? What if they put together their own "coalition of the willing" to enforce the resolution?

Russia has had a long and shameful past in her persecution of the Jews. She needs no help in hating Israel or wishing her to cease to exist.

But could it be the desire to get out of harms way concerning Islamic terrorism that will succeed in putting the predicted painful "hooks" in Russia's jaws?

From the view of a ruthless leader like former KGB head Vlad Putin, there may be no alternative than to do directly what Russia has attempted to accomplish by proxy armies in 1967 and 1973 - wipe Israel off the map.

To allow the chaos and carnage that dominated during the Chechen conflict to return will cause his own people to rise against him. He may very well conclude that either Israel goes, or he does.

At that moment, the hooks will be set.

Keep watching events involving Russia and Iran with an eye to Ezekiel 38-39. I would also highly recommend Joel Rosenberg's DVD and book Epicenter as essential viewing in these "interesting times." http://www.joelrosenberg.com/books.asp

 

<<< Older Posts

Newer Posts >>>