Scott's Blog - 6/30/08
Jesus Yes, Church No?
Last Friday I got a call from the religion beat writer at
the Arizona Daily Star.
She wanted a quote or two on the findings of the Pew Research
Poll that revealed that while 90% of those surveyed believe in
God, an impressive majority also state that they rarely, if
ever, attend church.
She seemed genuinely surprised when I told her that this didn't
surprise me in the slightest.
This conversation was accurately preserved in the article that
was published yesterday.
Ariz. churchgoer rate is far behind
nation's
By Stephanie Innes
Arizona Daily Star
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 06.29.2008
Nearly 40 percent of Arizonans say they seldom or never
attend worship services, and more than one-fifth claim no
religion, but most believe in God.
That snapshot of our beliefs and habits comes from a
survey of America's religious landscape released last week
by the Washington, D.C.-based Pew Forum on Religion & Public
Life.
As a nation, our religious beliefs are not as black-and-white as
the media often portray them, survey leaders said. The results
indicate Americans on the whole have a non-dogmatic approach to
faith and are open to varying viewpoints.
Seven in 10 of the more than 35,000 American adults
surveyed said many religions can lead to eternal life;
nearly 80 percent of Americans believe that miracles still
occur as they did in ancient times; and 12 percent of
atheists said they believe in heaven.
While the country's evangelical Christians often are
portrayed as Republican, anti-abortion and anti-gay, the
survey showed that isn't always true, for example
Fewer than half — 38 percent of the evangelical
respondents — identified themselves as Republican, more than
a quarter said homosexuality should be accepted by society,
and nearly a third said abortion should either be always
legal or legal in most cases.
The study also included a state-by-state breakdown.
Eighty-eight percent of Arizonans say they are either
absolutely certain or fairly certain there's a God, the poll
said. Nationally, 90 percent said they believe in God.
That doesn't mean Arizonans are going to churches, mosques
and synagogues, however.
"For a lot of people, being in church is something that
was kind of coerced in their life. . . . It doesn't surprise
me, even as a pastor and as a Christian," said the Rev.
Scott Richards, senior pastor at the evangelical Calvary
Christian Fellowship of Tucson and host of "Scott Richards
Live" on KGMS, 940 AM.
"I was an atheist before I became a Christian, and it
took me three years after I became a Christian to go to
church," Richards said.
Thirty-nine percent of Arizonans say they seldom or
never go to worship service, which is much higher than
the national average of 27 percent. And a Pew survey
released on Feb. 25 said 22 percent of Arizonans claim
no religious affiliation at all, also higher than the
national norm.
"We are such a state of transients," Richards said.
"Most of us do not have the history, for example, of
going to a church because our grandfather and
great-grandfather went there. And in Arizona, there
isn't the stress on church attendance like there is in
the South and the Midwest, where a lot of times the
church is the epicenter of a community's life."
He did wonder why nearly 70 percent of Americans and
more than half of evangelical Christians in the survey —
57 percent — said they do not think their faith is the
one true way to eternal life. Richards understood the
question to be asking whether Jesus is the only way to
God. The answer to that question is always "yes," he
said.
"I'm not the one who came up with that," he said. "The
non-Christians will rap evangelicals for saying our way
is the only way. But it's not our way. It's what Jesus
said."
Richards said perhaps many of those who answered the
survey are new to evangelical Christianity and have not
had a lot of exposure to the faith. At least that's what
he hopes.
Some experts have said the new survey results may
indicate Americans are not well-educated about Scripture
and the meaning of their beliefs, hence the one-fifth of
atheists who say they believe in God. In that case, they
might not be distinguishing between agnosticism and
atheism.
http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/faith/246023
The bottom line? There is a serious disconnect in our
society between spiritual interest and spiritual
knowledge.
People are open to the idea of a relationship with God,
but not enough to discover what they believe or why they
believe it.
At least not enough to get up on a Sunday morning and
invest an hour or so to deepen that knowledge.
And let's face it, if we do go through all the gyrations
necessary to get ourselves to church, only to discover
that:
The people we are surrounded by are cold, distant or
clique-y -
Or that the worship is more a tribute to the musicians'
egoes than focusing on God -
Or that the message is more about the pastor's opinions
or personal experiences than what the Bible has to say -
Chances are we won't be back.
And that is too bad.
One of the truths I discovered that changed the way I
looked at church was pretty simple.
The church isn't a building. It's the people who meet in the
building.
And like a chain, a church is only going to be as strong
as it's weakest link.
Paul put it this way:
For as we have many members in one body, but all the
members do not have the same function, so we, being
many, are one body in Christ, and individually members
of one another. Having then gifts differing
according to the grace that is given to us, let us
use them: if prophecy, let us prophesy
in proportion to our faith; or ministry, let us
use it in our ministering; he who teaches, in
teaching; he who exhorts, in exhortation; he who
gives, with liberality; he who leads, with diligence; he
who shows mercy, with cheerfulness. (Romans 12:4-8)
The Bible tells us the church isn't an organization, but an
organism.
And like a body, each of us has a God given rule to play
if the church is to be healthy.
And if we want the church to be healthy, we need to not
only be there, but be involved.
What liberated me to move from isolation to involvement
in the church was the realization that although I
couldn't be responsible for all the hypocrisy in the
church, I could be responsible not to be a hypocrite.
And although I couldn't be responsible for people being
cold, I could be responsible to allow the love of the
Lord to flow through me.
And although I couldn't be responsible for people being
bored with the Bible, I could fall in love with His Word
and share the amazing discoveries I was making with
others.
The results of the Pew research Study may confirm a
timeless truth. It is easier to stand outside the church
and be a critic, than to come inside and try to be used
by the Lord to make a difference.
But have you notice that no one ever builds a statue in
honor of a critic?
Scott's Blog - 6/26/08
Show Me The Way To Go Home?

There is an old proverb that goes something like this, "If
you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything."
If this is true, there is strong evidence to suggest that
evangelical Christians in the United States may be heading for a
fall.
Religious Americans: My faith isn't the
only way
WASHINGTON -
America remains a deeply religious nation, but a new
survey finds most Americans don't believe their tradition is the
only way to eternal life -- even if the denomination's teachings
say otherwise. The findings, revealed Monday in a survey of
35,000 adults, can either be taken as a positive sign of growing
religious tolerance, or disturbing evidence that Americans
dismiss or don't know fundamental teachings of their own faiths.
Among the more startling numbers in the
survey, conducted last year by the Pew Forum on Religion and
Public Life: 57 percent of evangelical church attenders said
they believe many religions can lead to eternal life, in
conflict with traditional evangelical teaching. In all, 70
percent of Americans with a religious affiliation shared that
view, and 68 percent said there is more than one true way to
interpret the teachings of their own religion.
"The survey shows religion in America is,
indeed, 3,000 miles wide and only three inches deep," said D.
Michael Lindsay, a Rice University sociologist of religion.
"There's a growing pluralistic impulse toward tolerance and that
is having theological consequences," he said.
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Church/Default.aspx?id=150084
Some will look at these results and cast them in
a positive light. They will say this growing broadmindedness on
spiritual issues is a sign of humility and a desire to see all
people as a part of God's family.
Only one problem with this impulse to join hands
and sing "Kum By Yah".
Jesus saw things very differently.
There are few passages in the Bible that deal
with the issue of eternal life more directly than John chapter
14.
Consider what Jesus had to say about the reality
not only of the existence of eternal life, but how we are to get
there.
“Let not your heart be troubled; you believe in
God, believe also in Me. In My Father’s house are many
mansions; if it were not so, I would have told
you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and
prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to
Myself; that where I am, there you may be also. And
where I go you know, and the way you know.”
Thomas said to Him, “Lord, we do not know where You are going, and how can
we know the way?”
Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and
the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me. (John
14:1-6)
This statement takes the subject of heaven out
of the realm of human debate and poll results.
Have you ever had a non Christian tell you, "You
Christians are so narrow minded! You say your way is the only
way to God."?
My standard reply is this - "This isn't my way.
I didn't come up with this. Jesus said, 'No one comes to the
Father but by Me.'"
Some will object, "Well, maybe so. But Jesus is
just one of many good religious teachers."
To which I usually reply, "How can you say Jesus
is a good religious teacher, and yet completely reject His
teaching as untrue? Wouldn't that make Him a bad religious
teacher?"
It gets deeper.
Jesus did not give us the option of taking his
teaching as merely one of many equally valid entrees in the
spiritual cafeteria line.
Why?
Consider the credentials He presented to His
disciples to be taken seriously on this subject.
“If you had known Me, you would have known My
Father also; and from now on you know Him and have seen Him.”
Philip said to Him, “Lord, show us the Father, and it is sufficient for
us.”
Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not
known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how
can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? Do you not believe that I am
in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I speak to
you I do not speak on My own authority; but the Father
who dwells in Me does the works. Believe Me that I am in
the Father and the Father in Me, or else believe Me for the sake
of the works themselves. (John 14:7-11)
Why could Jesus offer such definitive direction
on how to get to Heaven?
He claimed to be the very God Who made it in the
first place.
He backed up that claim with a sinless life,
teaching that has had an unparalleled impact upon this world,
miracles that included power over nature and even death itself.
But most definitively, He suffered, died and
rose again in a moment of history.
That is a level of credibility that Buddha,
Mohammed or Krishna cannot touch.
The question is, who will we listen to on the
subject of eternal life.
It is a question of life and death.
And have you ever noticed that when life is on
the line we tend to demand precision?
Imagine being in a doctor's office. he comes in
with the results of your latest exam.
"I'm sorry, but I have bad news for you. You
have a terminal illness. You are dying."
We would undoubtedly respond by saying, "Doctor!
What can we do about it?"
Could you imagine how you would react if the
doctor said, "Well, we could put a cast on your leg. Or we could
do some liposuction. That is very popular these days. Whatever
you think is best."
"But Doctor! You are an expert! I need help!
What do you think we can do to cure this disease?"
"Hey! Far be it from me to say that my way is
the only way. That would be intolerant. We could do acupuncture,
or even swing a dead chicken over your head. Whatever you like.
But I'm not going to be so narrow minded as to put my beliefs on
you."
If that happened we would probably flee the
office still wearing our very unstylish examining gown.
Why?
Because when life is on the line, precision
matters. In fact, when life is on the line we demand the best
expert opinion we can find.
This is what Jesus offers us.
This is why He is the way, the truth and the
life, not one of many.
The question is, will we believe Him?
Or just take our chances following the 56% herd?
Scott's Blog - 6/25/08
Not Every Treaty Is The Treaty
When a cease fire was announced between Israel and the
terrorist group Hamas late last week, questions were raised as
to whether this was a prophetically significant event.
After all, a crucial step in the rise of the Antichrist is
described in Daniel chapter 9.
Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week;
But in the middle of the week
He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering.
And on the wing of abominations shall be one who makes
desolate,
Even until the consummation, which is determined,
Is poured out on the desolate.” (Daniel (9:27)
Because the Antichrist will be seen as a man of peace,
bringing a solution to the seemingly intractable conflicts
between Israel and her neighbors, it is easy to see any
development that moves the region in that direction as a
potential fulfillment of prophecy.
This particular foray has apparently fallen short of eternal
consequences.
Israel's Olmert Sees Power Fade Along With
Cease-fire
June 24: Two Israeli
women hug as they stand at the entrance of a house hit by a
rocket fired by Palestinians from inside the Gaza Strip, in
the southern Israeli town of Sderot.
JERUSALEM —
Ehud Olmert, the embattled Israeli prime
minister, has sought to detract from his problems at home by
starting a series of spectacular diplomatic initiatives. But
with the ceasefire between Israel and the Hamas-controlled Gaza
Strip violated after less than five days, Olmert could now see
his hold on power crumble swiftly.
Olmert had hoped that his new opening to Syria,
Lebanon and
Hamas would stave off domestic
threats to his leadership, as opposition parties tried to force
him out of office. Yet 24 hours before the Knesset, the Israeli
parliament, was set to vote on a critical bill to dissolve
itself, Olmert’s six-month ceasefire deal with Hamas appeared in
serious peril.
At least two rockets were fired into the Israeli border
town of Sderot, injuring two people. “This is a blatant
violation of the calm, and we will weigh options,” an aide
quoted Mr Olmert as saying after the rockets struck.
The Egyptian-brokered truce, which took effect last
Thursday, calls on Hamas to prevent cross-border fire from the
Gaza Strip, which it seized by force a year ago.
Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility for the attack,
calling it a "first response" to
Israel’s killing overnight of a local commander
of the militant group and another Palestinian, who was
affiliated with Hamas, in the West Bank city of Nablus.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,371163,00.html
As we noted on the Scott Richards Live broadcast, this so
called cease fire was viewed by the Hamas terrorists as a "hudnah",
a strategic cease fire that would allow them to regroup and
rearm for more effective attacks.
It appears that this took a very short time to accomplish.
The bottom line? Ehud Olmert, who has spearheaded an attempt
to formally divide Jerusalem and give permanent and total
control of the Temple Mount to the Moslems will be ushered out
of office sooner rather than later.
It appears that former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a
man decidedly against such policies will be Olmert's successor.
And once again it appears that the Lord will not allow the
so-called Road Map to Peace to divide Jerusalem.
Prophetically, we know that any attempt at peace that will
deny the Jews the chance to rebuild their Temple is doomed to
failure.
We can also know that the Antichrist will not be able to
reveal himself as such until the church is removed at the time
of the Rapture.
For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only He
who now restrains will do so until He is taken out of the
way. And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the
Lord will consume with the breath of His mouth and destroy with
the brightness of His coming. (II Thessalonians 2:7-8)
Not every treaty in the Middle East is the treaty.
But we are certainly seeing developments that could very well
set the stage for this event coming together in an increasingly
rapid way.
The best advice?
Keep our eyes on Israel.
Keep our perspective in the Word.
And keep looking up!
And do this, knowing the time, that now it is
high time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is
nearer than when we first believed. (Romans 13:11)
Scott's Blog - 6/24/08
The Old Shell (Fish) Game
The last thing in the world I want to hear about when I go
to church is politics.
Most pastors find themselves clearly outside of their area of
expertise when they offer their views on public policy.
But have you ever stopped to consider that the polar opposite is
also true?
The last thing I want to hear from politicians are opinions
about a relationship with God.
In fact, most politicians find themselves clearly outside their
area of expertise when they offer their views on the Bible.
Exhibit A of this phenomenon in action hit the internet
yesterday.
Dobson accuses Obama of 'distorting' Bible
By ERIC GORSKI – 20
hours ago
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (AP)
— As Barack Obama broadens his outreach to evangelical
voters, one of the movement's biggest names, James Dobson,
accuses the likely Democratic presidential nominee of distorting
the Bible and pushing a "fruitcake interpretation" of the
Constitution.
The criticism, to be aired Tuesday on Dobson's Focus on
the Family radio program, comes shortly after an Obama aide
suggested a meeting at the organization's headquarters here,
said Tom Minnery, senior vice president for government and
public policy at Focus on the Family.
The conservative Christian group provided The Associated
Press with an advance copy of the pre-taped radio segment, which
runs 18 minutes and highlights excerpts of a speech Obama gave
in June 2006 to the liberal Christian group Call to Renewal.
Obama mentions Dobson in the speech.
"Even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we
expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America,
whose Christianity would we teach in the schools?" Obama said.
"Would we go with James Dobson's or Al Sharpton's?" referring to
the civil rights leader.
Dobson took aim at examples Obama cited in asking which
Biblical passages should guide public policy — chapters like
Leviticus, which Obama said suggests slavery is OK and eating
shellfish is an abomination, or Jesus' Sermon on the Mount, "a
passage that is so radical that it's doubtful that our own
Defense Department would survive its application."
"Folks haven't been reading their Bibles," Obama said.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gnLulDbwWGYGLiXlDW5hPiNMGMRQD91G51AG0
One of the things I have discovered in sharing my faith
outside the friendly confines of the church is that there are
people who reject the notion that the Bible is the Word of God.
I have also discovered that the objections to the reality and
relevancy of the Bible as the Word of God are fairly standard
and predictable.
The objections that Barak Obama raises fit into the category
of "A Little Knowledge Is A Dangerous Thing."
Let's take them one at a time.
Does the book of Leviticus teach that "slavery is OK"?
Slavery was certainly not invented in the book of Leviticus.
It was a pervasive reality in the time of Moses. For those so
afflicted it was a life long sentence to a brutal existence,
deprived of any sense of human dignity, able to be terminated at
any moment.
The passages we find in Leviticus not only bring strict and
humane safeguards against abuse of slaves, but also declare that
slavery would be temporary. At the Year of Jubilee all slaves
would be given their liberty. (Leviticus 27)
Slavery in that time was a way for those who couldn't pay
their bills to satisfy their debts to their creditors. It was
treaty as a reality. But nowhere do we find the Scriptures
saying that it was "OK".
What about the idea that eating shell fish is an
"abomination"?
The term "abomination" is a strong word in Hebrew. More than
just seeing something as defiled or unclean, an "abomination"
was something that was to be considered repugnant and to be
avoided at all costs.
This law was intended to be protective. If you've ever
eaten bad clams you know why! But it was also part and parcel of
God's intention to make the Jewish nation unique and distinct
from others. They would do a number of things differently to
point out the fact that they were not just another political
entity. In Israel, the Lord was their King.
These were laws that applied to Israel as God's own nation.
They were not intended for any other.
To suggest that the presence of these commands makes the
entire message of the Bible irrelevant shows a poor
understanding of these portions of Scripture, not a problem with
the Scriptures themselves.
I have read some pretty far out takes on the Sermon On the
Mount, but I have yet to read one that sees Jesus' Words as a
directive on national defense.
I think you get the picture.
When someone rolls out a cascade of takes on Scripture that
pays absolutely no attention to context it is a sad thing.
But when that same person then assumes a place of moral and
intellectual superiority by saying, "Folks haven't been reading
their Bibles" it is tragic.
The message of the Bible is so simple that a child can grasp
it, but so profound it requires careful study.
Politicians on both sides of the aisle would be well advised
to treat God's Word with the respect it deserves.
Scott's Blog - 6/23/08
The Next Great Awakening
To hear some people tell it, the most exciting days to be a
Christian are seen only in the rear view mirror.
"Oh, man! Wouldn't it have been great to have been around
during the time of the First century church - to see the world
turned upside down by the message of Jesus?"
No doubt.
"Oh, to have been a part of the Great Awakening! To see people
travel for miles on horseback just for a chance to hear the Good
News!"
An awesome experience to be sure.
"Oh, the Jesus Movement days! You wouldn't have believed how God
moved to save all those hippies back then!"
God certainly has done some amazing things down through time.
But the more I hear people taking a stroll down a spiritual
version of Memory Lane, the more I find myself wondering, "So
what has God been up to lately?"
Would it surprise you to learn that God is moving in such a
powerful way today that what He is doing may very well make the
Great Awakening look like a home Bible study in comparison?
Rev. Jin Mingri, founding pastor of Zion
Church, gives a sermon.
Christianity — repressed, marginalized
and, in many cases, illegal in China for more than half a
century — is sweeping the country, overflowing churches and
posing a sensitive challenge to the officially atheist Communist
Party.
By some estimates Christian churches,
most of them underground, now have roughly 70 million members,
as many as the party itself. A growing number of those
Christians are in fact party members.
This rise, driven by evangelical
Protestants, reflects a wider spiritual awakening in China. As
communism fades into today's free-market reality, many Chinese
describe a "crisis of faith" and seek solace everywhere from
mystical Taoist sects to Bahai temples and Christian
megachurches.
Today the government counts 21 million Catholics and
Protestants—a 50 percent increase in less than 10 years—though
the underground population is far larger. The World Christian
Database's estimate of 70 million Christians amounts to a 5
percent share of the population, second only to Buddhism.
At a time when Christianity in Western Europe is dwindling,
China's believers are redrawing the world's religious map with a
growing community already exceeding all the Christians in Italy.
And increasing Christian clout in China has the potential to
alter relations with the United States and other nations.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-jesus-1-1-webjun22,0,3282799.story?track=rss
A move of God so powerful that it might
radically alter the policies of the most populous, and
potentially economically powerful nation on earth?
How is this happening?
The most fascinating aspect of what is
happening in China is that it defies much of the conventional
wisdom concerning so called "revivals".
It is not characterized by over the top
emotionalism.
It has not been "brought about" by some
concerted prayer/fasting/call to holiness movement.
The Tribune article indicates that it is
happening because pastors like Jin Mingri are teaching God's
Word and loving people.
The Spirit of God is doing the rest.
At Scott Richards Live we are seeing that
this hunger for the Word is not isolated in China. This month to
date we have seen a half million hits on our web site.
Even more remarkably, over 150,000 of these
hits have come from the Russian Federation.
I wish I could say that we are seeing this
kind of response because we are using state of the art marketing
techniques.
But all we are doing is making God's Word
available in our question and answer format.
The bottom line? God always honors His Word.
Too often the promise of a great work of God
is used as a kind of emotional and spiritual tool to hype people
into greater church involvement.
Pray more, share more, give more and revival
will come. Or so we are often told.
The move of the Lord in China tells us that
it is God's Word that changes the lives of people. If the lives
of people change, the fate of even entire nations can change.
But make no mistake. It isn't some new and
crowd pleasing approach that creates a real move of the Spirit.
It is the same approach a man knee deep in
one of the most powerful works of God this world has seen
advocated.
Therefore, since we have this ministry, as we
have received mercy, we do not lose heart. But we have
renounced the hidden things of shame, not walking in craftiness
nor handling the word of God deceitfully, but by manifestation
of the truth commending ourselves to every man’s conscience in
the sight of God. But we have this treasure in earthen vessels,
that the excellence of the power may be of God and not of us.
(II Corinthians 4:1-2,7)
Scott's Blog - 6/19/08
Bitter or Better?
What do you say to someone who has lost just about
everything?
Answering that question has to be one of the most challenging
parts of the job description of the president of the United
States.
In the aftermath of the massive flooding that has devestated a
large portion of Iowa, George W. Bush found himself facing this
exact question earlier today.

CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (AP) - President Bush, surveying the
aftermath of devastating floods during a lightning-quick tour of
the Midwest on Thursday, assured residents and rescuers alike
that he is listening to their concerns and understands their
exhaustion.
"Obviously, to the extent we can help immediately, we will
help," said Bush, still mindful of criticism that the government
reacted slowly to Hurricane Katrina three years ago.
"You'll come back better," the president said while being
briefed by state and local officials at a cinderblock emergency
operations center set up at a community college here, part of a
three-hour tour. "Sometimes it's hard to see it."
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080619/D91DDNL00.html
I have to give the president points for optimism. But there
is a reason why it is sometimes hard to see how things can get
better after a major reversal in life.
No matter how much moral, financial and material support is
given in the aftermath of a personal crisis, there is still one
wild card that will ultimately spell the difference between
overcoming tough circumstances or being overcome by them.
It can be summed up in one word - attitude.
No one gets a get out of jail free card from problems in this
life. But how we choose to respond to those problems will go a
long way toward determining the quality of our lives.
Consider how this principle played out in the life of the
apostle Paul.
But I want you to know, brethren, that the things which
happened to me have actually turned out for the
furtherance of the gospel, so that it has become evident to the
whole palace guard, and to all the rest, that my chains are in
Christ; and most of the brethren in the Lord, having become
confident by my chains, are much more bold to speak the word
without fear.
Some indeed preach Christ even from envy and strife, and some
also from goodwill: The former preach Christ from selfish
ambition, not sincerely, supposing to add affliction to my
chains; but the latter out of love, knowing that I am appointed
for the defense of the gospel. What then? Only that in
every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is preached;
and in this I rejoice, yes, and will rejoice. (Philippians
1:12-18)
Stop and think of the overwhelming personal challenges Paul
faced in this set of circumstances. He was hated so badly that
his enemies had made repeated attempts to kill him. he was a
chained up prisoner for no other reason than his loyalty and
love for God. To make matters worse, some who envied him seized
this opportunity to try to make a name for themselves and take
Paul's place while he was out of commission.
But Paul didn't react to this laundry list of negatives.
Instead he responded by keeping his eyes focused on the big
picture.
He didn't waste time asking, "Why me, Lord?"
Instead he asked, "What are You up to Lord?"
Realizing that although not all things are good, but that God
can work all things together for good (Romans 8:28) kept Paul
from getting bitter.
Instead it made him better.
And so those who have lost their homes and livelihoods in Iowa
face this same challenge.
And once again we face a timeless truth - It's not what happens
to us in life, but how we respond that tells the story.
Scott's Blog - 6/18/08
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsor...
Earlier this week, we fielded a call on Scott Richards Live
from a college student. He shared that he was feeling a little
blown away at the outright hostility toward Christianity he was
encountering in his classes.
My first response was, "Brother, I feel your pain!"
During my adventures in secular education, I was constantly
amazed by professors and instructors who would take time away
from their subjects to "share" their views on the Christian
faith.
During my first college English class, the professor went so far
as to begin his first remarks with the winsome and tolerant
statement, "If you are one of those born-again types, you might
as well drop this class right now because I hate you people!"
He then launched into a sermonette on how Christians were
responsible for everything from the Holocaust to the destruction
of the environment.
After twenty minutes of emotional appeals and researched
arguments worthy of a grocery store check out line tabloid, I
finally raised my hand.
"Yes!!" he said, looking like an evangelist waiting to make a
convert.
"Excuse me, but I am paying good money for this class. Do you
mind talking about a subject you know something about?"
From that moment it was, as they say, "On like Donkey Kong".
But this class wasn't an exception. Biology, history,
philosophy, speech, even broadcast production featured regular
breaks for attempts at mocking or repudiating faith in Jesus.
Ironically, I also noticed that there was an overwhelming
tolerance for any other religious sentiment floating around in
the ozone.
People would declare that they found fulfillment worshipping
citrus fruit and that was beautiful.
Let it slip you believed that Jesus rose from the dead? Get
ready to duck and cover. "Who let a Neanderthal like you into
this respectable institution?"
I was reminded of this phenomenon when I read the following
article posted on the Answers In Genesis web site today.
In one of the most bizarre and outlandish pieces of
journalism I have seen in a long time, a large
subscription-based magazine on architecture (The
Architectural Record—over 100,000 subscriptions) and one of
their writers—who has a section to critique the architecture
of museums—blasted the
Creation Museum because of its stand on
God’s Word. The writer uses words and phrases like the
following: “loony bin,” “Christian fundamentalist crusade
against scientific reason,” “pernicious,” “In flat-out
rejection of the Enlightenment rationalism that brought the
United States into being,” (yes, he actually said that in
print), “more frightening than Disney’s Haunted Mansion.”
As you read other critiques of museum’s by Martin
Filler, you will see that he critiques the buildings—but for
the Creation Museum he not only blasts the Christian
message, but makes one of the most blatantly false
statements I have seen about the Founding Fathers of this
nation. This reporter couldn’t help himself—he is so
ardently anti-Christian—and his anger at the message of the
Creation Museum welled up in him so much, he just had to
make this scathing attack when he was supposed to be
critiquing the architecture—which in itself is ironic,
because the architects of the museum, A.M. Kinney
Associates, actually received an award and recognition for
the design of the Creation Museum building.
Here is the “architectural critique” from this
magazine. By the way, I have found that even some of the
most ardent secular humanists acknowledge that many of the
Founding Fathers of this nation were dedicated Christians.
But read on as Martin Filler blasts the message of the
museum—but in doing so, openly mocks and attacks anyone who
is a Christian:
Creation Museum, Petersburg, Kentucky, by A.M.
Kinney Associates. At a time when museums are accused of
turning themselves into theme parks, along comes a
bizarre new institution that makes Walt Disney World
seem like the Albertina. This is not surprising, since
the displays of cartoonish dinosaurs and humanoids at
the Creation Museum—devised to supplant Darwin’s theory
of evolution with a Bible-based fantasia of the world’s
origins—were dreamed up by a former Universal Studios
designer, Patrick Marsh. I use the term “institution” in
both the museological and the psychiatric sense, because
this only-in-America loony bin is no more a museum than
I am Napoleon. Even more unsettling than its mission to
enlist impressionable children in the Christian
fundamentalist crusade against scientific reason is the
fact that there are already two dozen such creationist
museums around the country, though none equals this in
impressive presentation values that make it all the more
pernicious. In flat-out rejection of the Enlightenment
rationalism that brought the United States into being,
the Creation Museum is more frightening than Disney’s
Haunted Mansion. Let us pray.
http://archrecord.construction.com/features/critique/0806critique-1.asp
Wow!
So much for objective analysis.
It is always somewhat shocking to encounter in-your-face bigotry
and name calling masquerading as enlightenment.
But it shouldn't be surprising.
Jesus gave us all a heavenly heads up in John 15.
“If the world hates you, you know that it hated Me before it
hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love
its own. Yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you
out of the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember the
word that I said to you, ‘A servant is not greater than his
master.’ If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you. If
they kept My word, they will keep yours also. But all these
things they will do to you for My name’s sake, because they do
not know Him who sent Me. If I had not come and spoken to them,
they would have no sin, but now they have no excuse for their
sin. He who hates Me hates My Father also. If I had not done
among them the works which no one else did, they would have no
sin; but now they have seen and also hated both Me and My
Father. But this happened that the word might be
fulfilled which is written in their law, ‘They hated Me
without a cause.' (John 15:18-25)
So how do we respond when we are on the receiving
end of a spiritual Scud?
Blessed are you when men hate you,
And when they exclude you,
And revile you, and cast out your name as evil,
For the Son of Man’s sake.
Rejoice in that day and leap for joy!
For indeed your reward is great in heaven,
For in like manner their fathers did to the prophets. (Luke
6:22-23)
A few hints for keeping on track when worldly people have
you in the cross hairs -
First, make sure if we are catching grief it's because we have
been faithful to the Lord. There is absolutely no value in being
criticized because we have been mean, conceited or hypocritical.
If we are going to suffer, let's make sure it is for our faith,
not our own flakeyness.
Second, not all rejection is a bad thing. Consider the source.
If someone who hates God hates us, we are in very good company.
In many ways I am grateful for the times I have encountered
these sort of people. The attacks they have leveled against
faith in Christ have caused me to dig for answers that have
strengthened my faith. I have also discovered that hard core
critics of Christianity are more often than not living lives
that are the best argument against their own position.
Third, stay faithful to Jesus. Ultimately it is His opinion of
us that really matters. And those who have ridiculed and
insulted God's children will one day have a chance to explain
themselves before our Father in heaven.
It's been said that having a happy and healthy life is the best
revenge. Let's not let the crazy criticisms of hardened hearts
keep us from enjoying the nearness of the Lord and the
trustworthiness of His Word.
Scott's Blog - 6/17/08
The 4:19 Solution
There is an old Arab proverb about never allowing a camel to
get it's nose in the tent. Pretty soon it will take over the
whole thing.
We may be seeing this same phenomenon in action in the aftermath
of the California Supreme Court decision to legalize gay
marriage.
Originally billed as "equal rights" for gay couples to wed, it
now looks more and more like this will be a case of "special
rights", with troubling consequences for those who refuse to
cooperate with the courts based on moral, ethical or spiritual
grounds.
Gay marriage: a new bind for church
groups
By Ben Arnoldy
Tue Jun 17, 4:00 AM ET
Oakland, Calif. - The
same-sex marriage march begins across
California Tuesday, with thousands of gay
couples expected to wed in the coming weeks. But
some notes of discord and rebellion can already
be heard above Pachelbel's Canon.
Several
county clerks have said they
will stop performing marriage ceremonies for all
couples, gay or straight. And the state supreme
court, fresh from its decision to legalize gay
marriage, will decide shortly on whether a
private-practice doctor can deny artificial
insemination to a lesbian couple.
As gay marriage gains wider legal
footing, scholars anticipate a flood of such
conscientious objector
cases. A key flash point will be religiously
affiliated organizations that serve the public,
such as hospitals, schools, and
adoption agencies, and hold
beliefs opposed to
gay marriage.
Gay rights advocates say the courts have
found workable compromises so far. But opponents
warn that religious groups may have to retreat
dramatically from the public square unless
legislatures agree to create some religious
exemptions.
"As gays come out of the closet,
conservative religious people are put back in
the sanctuary," says Marc Stern, general counsel
for the
American Jewish Congress in
New York.
He expects legal battles ahead in
religious schools, youth groups, and summer
camps. Some recent cases have already alarmed
lawyers for religious groups:
• In 2006, a Methodist group in New
Jersey that rented out its boardwalk to the
public for weddings lost
tax exemptions after
refusing to allow a same-sex commitment
ceremony.
• In April, a
New Mexico human rights commission
charged a wedding photographer in Albuquerque
thousands of dollars in legal fees after she
refused, based on her Christian beliefs, a
request to shoot a commitment ceremony.
• After the
legalization of gay marriage
in
Massachusetts, the
legislature refused to grant longtime adoption
provider
Catholic Charities a
religious exemption to let it place children
with heterosexual parents only.
Stern notes that Catholic Charities in
Boston ultimately withdrew from providing
adoption services to the public.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20080617/ts_csm/achurchgay
As we have noted in this space, the
California decision may be a temporary one, as
an initiative to amend the California State
Constitution to ban gay marriage is up for a
vote in November.
But the redefining of an institution with
essentially spiritual roots, by the secular
courts looks more and more like a genie that has
been let out of the bottle.
The key issue in the case was that gay
marriage was being entered into by "consenting
adults", and as such the government had no
business putting moral or spiritual prohibitions
on a secular arrangement.
The problem with this ruling is two fold.
First, if the government must support the
right of "consenting adults" to redefine
marriage as far as gender is concerned, why not
in numbers as well?
What business does the government have in
telling "consenting adults" that a polygamous
marriage is wrong?
Second, if the government insists that gay
marriage, or even polygamous marriage is the law
of the land, what will happen to those who
disagree?
Get ready for another tidal wave of law
suits.
And be prepared as well to see not only
churches, but also faith based social service
agencies lose their tax exempt status.
And be sued for damages.
And essentially be shut down.
There may be a glimmer of hope if similar
accommodations are made for "conscientious
objectors" to this oncoming policy.
Following the Roe v. Wade decision on
abortion in 1973, courts saw an initial flurry
of
conscientious objector
cases, followed by a host of legislative
exemptions.
At the federal level, the Church
Amendment prevented the threat of withholding
federal monies to compel individuals or
institutions to perform an abortion contrary to
their beliefs. Most states followed suit with
their own versions.
"I argue for conscience clauses, the same
thing we have for abortions," says Washington
and Lee University law professor Robin Wilson.
Such exemptions allow physicians and religious
hospitals to opt out of performing an abortion
provided other doctors are available and the
mother's life isn't in danger.
Similarly,
county clerks like those in
California's Kern and
Butte Counties could opt out
of issuing
marriage licenses to
same-sex couples – so long as there's another
clerk around to do it. Ditto for adoption
providers and artificial insemination cases.
Gay rights activists aren't
warming to the mounting discussion of religious
exemptions. They argue that courts have been
balancing religious beliefs with
antidiscrimination protections for many years.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20080617/ts_csm/achurchgay
Would this uneasy compromise prevail? We can
certainly hope so. But it is equally possible
that the United States very well may follow the
same path as Canada.
Government to pastor: Renounce your faith!
Now banned from expressing moral opposition
to homosexuality
Posted: June
09, 2008
10:00 pm Eastern
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
A Canadian
human
rights
tribunal ordered a Christian pastor to
renounce his faith and never again
express moral opposition to
homosexuality, according to a new
report.
In a decision dated May 30 in the
penalty phase of the quasi-judicial
proceedings run by the
Alberta Human Rights Tribunal,
evangelical pastor Stephen Boisson was
banned from expressing his biblical
perspective of homosexuality and ordered
to pay $5,000 for "damages for pain and
suffering" as well as apologize to the
activist
who complained of being hurt.
According to a report from Pete
Vere at the Catholic Exchange, the
penalty could foreshadow the possible
fate of the Rev. Alphonse de Valk, who
also cited the biblical perspective on
homosexuality in the nation's debate
over same-sex "marriage"
and now faces HRC charges.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=66704
This raises a major question for
Bible believing pastors and leaders in
our day. If a similar course of action
is pursued here, what will we do?
Real direction is given to us in Acts
chapter four.
So they called them and commanded
them not to speak at all nor teach in
the name of Jesus. But Peter and John
answered and said to them, “Whether it
is right in the sight of God to listen
to you more than to God, you judge. For
we cannot but speak the things which we
have seen and heard.”(Acts 4:18-20)
The response to the flood of
secularism in our society today is
simple - stay faithful.
Keep teaching the whole counsel of
God so God's people will know how He
views the institution of marriage that
He created (see Matthew 19:4-6).
Keep reaching those whose lives are
being damaged by the consequences of sin
and fallenness in this world.
Keep seeking to live lives that show
there is a better way to find real peace
and fulfillment than man's secular
"solutions".
Keep shining with the love and truth
of Jesus and we will be just fine.
Scott's Blog - 6/16/08
Don't Quote Me?
Every now and then I will get a call asking if I would be
willing to be interviewed for a newspaper story with a
"religious" angle.
The latest was for the following article that ran yesterday in
the Arizona Daily Star.
E.T. hunters join forces with Mars
lander crew
By Stephanie Innes
Arizona Daily Star
The University of Arizona-led Phoenix Mars Mission
includes an intriguing partner: a group dedicated to finding
extraterrestrials.
The SETI Institute — SETI stands for the Search for
Extraterrestrial Intelligence — is a partner in science
experiments under way on the red planet.
The group's name may be familiar to movie-goers who
remember the 1997 film "Contact," starring Jodie Foster.
Foster plays a SETI scientist who detects an
extraterrestrial radio signal from the star Vega.
But don't get too excited. Officials with SETI
anticipate no such signal from Mars.
"There will be no green men popping into the camera
waving at us, no huge footprints," SETI researcher and
Phoenix Mars science team member John R. Marshall said. "If
there has been any life on Mars it's unlikely it got beyond
simple, microbial forms."
The Phoenix spacecraft touched down on the red planet May
25. Science experiments are expected to last about 90 days.
http://www.azstarnet.com/metro/243861.php
The author of the article, Stephanie Innes, asked if
evangelicals were opposed to the idea of looking for life on
other planets.
I told her the Bible was silent on any mention of life on
other planets. But that the Bible was absolutely positive on
the fact that God is the Author of life.
In fact, not only does the Bible declare that life is no
accident, genuine science tells us the very existence of
even the most basic building blocks of life is nothing short
of a miracle.
Even noted astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle commented that the
chances of even the simplest cell originating by chance were
the same as assembling a fully functioning 747 jet by having
a tornado blow through a junk yard.
The Bible tells us:
The heavens declare the glory of God;
And the firmament shows His handiwork.
Day unto day utters speech,
And night unto night reveals knowledge. (Psalm
19:1-2)
I concluded by saying that it is God Who not only created
life, but gives to us the curiosity, creativity and
intelligence to explore the creation He has made.
As such there is nothing biblically wrong with missions like
the Phoenix lander.
Now, about half of that interaction actually made the
article.
Some I have talked to have reacted by saying, "If they are
going to edit you down and leave out the best parts, why
even bother giving the interview?"
The answer seems pretty simple to me.
First, having worked in news, I appreciate just how hard it
can be to come up with a good quote. If I can help make
someone else's job easier, I am more than willing to help.
Second, as long as the quote isn't folded, spindled and
mutilated beyond recognition, it's always a good thing to
get God's Word out in as many forums as possible.
Third, if we can show that believers aren't afraid to share
in the marketplace of ideas, and can express Biblical truth
in a rational and courteous way, who knows what other
opportunities may open up?
As Paul put it:
I have become all things to all men, that I might by
all means save some.
Now this I do for the gospel’s sake, that I may be partaker
of it with you.(I Corinthians 9:22-23)
Scott's Blog - 6/12/08
An Act of God?
That's what they would call this in the insurance business.
Tornado Kills 4 in Iowa Boy Scout Camp
Laura Inns/Omaha World-Herald, via Associated Press
An aerial view of the remnants of a
building destroyed at the Little Sioux Scout Ranch in Iowa.
The story becomes even more harrowing
when it gets personal.
Boy Scout tells of surviving Little Sioux tornado
BLENCOE, Ia. –
Zach Jessen scrambled under a table just before the
tornado hit.
He and about 20 other Boy Scouts huddled in a bunk house at
the Little Sioux Scout Ranch, preparing to watch a movie
when a Scoutmaster ordered them under the tables. Jessen
grabbed another Scout under his right arm and prayed.
"I was just praying and hoping I would make it
through," Jessen said Thursday.
The tornado that tore through the 1,800-acre camp was
classified an EF-3, said Becky Griffis, a meteorologist for
the National Weather Service in Omaha.
Wind speed is estimated to have
been 145 mph. The tornado was on the ground for about 14
miles and cut a straight path that begins near Interstate
Highway29 in far northwest Harrison County to Moorhead.
Jessen, a 14-year-old from Fremont, Neb., was still
wearing his brown Boy Scout shirt Thursday morning. His
right arm was scraped and swollen, his wrist sporting a
white hospital bracelet from a brief stay in a hospital in
Onawa.
Jessen's was one harrowing and heroic story among
many at the ranch, tucked in the Loess Hills about 40 miles
north of Omaha. Jessen and about 100 youth and 25 adults
were there attending a weeklong leadership training event,
Pahuk Pride.
Jessen was in one of two bunk houses where scouts
and their leaders took shelter when the storm bore down on
them.
About 60 scouts took shelter in one and mostly escaped
injury. About 20 scouts, including Jessen, were in a similar
building about a quarter mile away in the same valley. It
was there were all four scouts died, said Blencoe Fire Chief
Ed Osius, who was among the first on the scene.
Osius said the tornado also destroyed the home of
the permanent Scoutmaster at the camp. The Scoutmaster, his
wife, and infant child and a teenager were all injured,
Osius said.
The scouts attending the event, Pahuk Pride, were selected
for the honor by Scoutmasters around Iowa, Nebraska and
South Dakota. Besides leadership skills, those who survived
will bring back to their troops incredible stories worthy of
a merit badge.
Jessen said when the weather began to turn bad
Wednesday evening he left his tent and took shelter in a
one-story, wooden bunk house built on a cement slab.
The scouts were going to watch a movie when warning came
about the storm, possibly from a weather radio on the ranch.
"As soon as he said 'Monty Python and the Holy Grail,' the
power went out," Jessen said. A Scoutmaster yelled for them
to get under the tables. Then the doors blew open. The
tornado tore the roof off.
Jessen said he remembers the noise of the rain. The
rocks. The freight-train sound of the tornado. He also
remembers when a pickup truck was tossed into the stone
chimney, knocking it into the bunk house. "When it hit,"
Jessen said, "it sounded like an explosion because it fell
directly on the cement."
Jessen was in charge of eight other scouts. One of
them was killed when the chimney fell.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080612/NEWS/80612042
Inevitably a horrible event like this stirs up questions
in its aftermath.
"Why do bad things happen to good people?"
"Why were some spared and others taken?"
"Where was God when the pick up truck struck that stone
chimney?"
Inevitably bad answers are offered.
One perennial PBS talking head suggested that the
surviving families "Sit down and make a list of all the
things that they are still grateful for."
Really.
Kind of like saying, "But look on the bright side Mrs.
Lincoln. At least you had a nice night out at the theater."
So what is the Biblical response?
A reading of the book of Job tells us that there is often
more to tragedy than meets the eye.
It also tells us that the poster child of a good man
suffering bad things in this world was never given a reason
why this side of heaven.
Job's faithfulness literally rocked the gates of Hell.
But all he heard from the Lord was a simple, "Trust Me."
Jesus was even more succinct.
When told that the Roman governor had arbitrarily
slaughtered some people from Galilee so that their blood
actually mingled with their sacrifices, the question of
"Why?" was heavy in the air.
There were present at that season some who told Him about
the Galileans whose blood Pilate had mingled with their
sacrifices. And Jesus answered and said to them, “Do
you suppose that these Galileans were worse sinners than all
other Galileans, because they suffered such things?
I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise
perish. Or those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam
fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse
sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem? I
tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise
perish.” (Luke 13:1-5)
In Jesus' response we see that when it comes to tragedy,
God is more interested in telling us what we need to know
than what we might want to know.
Death in this fallen world is a sad reality. It came
about as a result of man's sin. However we die, we will all
face a greater issue after death - judgment . That judgment
will determine where we spend eternity.
From Jesus' point of view, that issue is of ultimate
importance.
So important that he went through the horrors of both
physical and spiritual death to provide us the way to a life
that will never end.
For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten
Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have
everlasting life. (John 3:16)
Tragedies like the Iowa tornado disaster underscore the
value of that gift.
The ultimate "act of God" provided life for all who will
receive it.
Scott's Blog - 6/11/08
The US and the Last Days - Part II
One common criticism that is leveled at those who focus on
biblical prophecy is that this is a message of gloom and doom
that inevitably leads people to check out of life in the here
and now.
In my experience the precise opposite has been the case. I
believe that, properly understood, the conviction that Jesus
could return for His people at any moment is a powerful source
of Scripturally based optimism.
Consider how the doctrine of the Rapture effects our
understanding of the role (or conspicuous lack thereof) of the
United States in End Times prophecy.
If you have been following along with the blog this week, you
know we have devoted some time to exploring this question.
There are two schools of thought as to why the United States is
absent in the Last Days. One school of thought speculates that
the United States may be taken out before hand by a limited war
or a terrorist attack.
But consider another alternative. What if the United States is a
non player in the End Times because of the Rapture of the
church?
Think about it.
On 9-11 our entire nation was shaken to the foundation by an
event that removed 3,000 lives from this earth.
Could you imagine if we multiplied the impact of that event by
33,000?
In it's latest research, the Barna Group estimates that 47% of
Americans are Bible believing, born again Christians. This would
mean that 101 million people in this country have a personal
relationship with Christ.
http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=Topic&TopicID=8
Imagine the impact the sudden removal of 101 million
people would have on this country.
Transportation systems would be paralyzed.
Our economic system would grind to a screeching halt.
Key people in government, military and social services would
leave irreplaceable gaps in our country's ability to function.
The United States would collapse.
Now when we consider the effect of this event on other key
nations and power blocks in the Last Days we can see that
although the sudden vanishing of believers would be felt, it
would not be nearly as devastating.
In fact, in some nations, it would be business as usual.
Why is the United States conspicuously absent in Biblical
prophecy?
I believe the post Rapture condition of our country will be so
weakened that we will be reduced to a minor bit player on the
world's stage, most likely co-opted into the power sphere of the
Revived Roman Empire under the Anti-Christ.
And this is reason for optimism. And personal and practical
investment in outreach.
I would love nothing more than to see the figure of those who
will be caught up with Christ to rise to 110 million, or 120
million or 200 million!
How could this happen?
By believers committing themselves to a vision of connecting
others to Christ, not our own comfort.
By walking our talk so that people don't merely hear about God's
love, but see it in reality.
By praying that we would make the most of our time and our
lives.
And do this, knowing the time, that now it is high
time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is
nearer than when we first believed. The night is far
spent, the day is at hand. Therefore let us cast off the works
of darkness, and let us put on the armor of light. Let us walk
properly, as in the day, not in revelry and drunkenness, not in
lewdness and lust, not in strife and envy. But put on the Lord
Jesus Christ, and make no provision for the flesh, to fulfill
its lusts. (Romans 13:11-14)
I want to make it to the Rapture and do my best to bring as
many people along with me as I can.
Let's pray that the Lord makes that an ever growing reality in
our lives as we await His return.
Scott's Blog - 6/10/08
The US and the Last Days
When we study the portrait of the End Times we find in the
scriptures, the major players are hard to miss.
Israel? Check. Miraculously back in the
Promised Land as Ezekiel 36-37 predicts.
Russia, Iran and their fellow members of the Gog and
Magog Invasion force? Ezekiel 38-39 coming into focus.
The Revived Roman Empire? Check the value of
the Euro versus the dollar to see this sleeping economic giant
is stating to awaken.
The 'King of the South"? This petro-dollar
fueled Islamic coalition is building on both the wealth of the
Saudis and the nuclear capabilities of Pakistan.
The "Kings of the East"? The 200 million man
army of Revelation 9:16 is no longer a stretch to imagine as we
see the rise of Communist China on the world stage.
But any discussion of the cast of characters that will
eventually slam head to head in the Battle of Armaggedon, a
question will inevitably be raised -
"So where is the United States in the Last Days?"
Some have tried to squint hard and read the United States
presence into passages like Revelation 17-18, the vivid portrait
of Babylon as the focal point of religion and commerce in the
empire of the Antichrist.
I have found such arguments unconvincing. When the scripture
refers to Babylon, it tends to mean Babylon. The description of
this "city set on seven hills" tells me that we aren't referring
to a nation. When we see that Iraq is well on the road to
recovery, and that international concerns are looking at the
literal site of Babylon as a key communications and diplomatic
hub, we can set aside speculations that these predictions refer
to the United States.
So where are we? It seems incredible that a nation that is the
800 pound gorilla in matters economic, military and diplomatic
is a non entity in the Last Days.
I believe there are two possible answers to this Biblical
mystery. One is horrific. The other is amazingly hopeful.
Let's start with the potential bad news.
Yes, the United States is the straw that stirs the drink in our
world today. But with that high profile status comes danger.
Every disgruntled group with pretensions of greatness wants to
make their mark by bringing us down.
9-11 showed just how devastating a blow can be struck by a small
handful of committed fanatics.
But we may not have seen anything yet.
What if one of these disgruntled fanatics finds himself the
leader not just of a splinter cell, but an entire nation?
And what if that nation were to obtain the technology to
construct and deliver weapons of mass destruction?
Consider this entry from Joel Rosenberg's Flash Traffic Blog:
(Washington, D.C., June 6, 2008)
-- Using some of his most apocalyptic rhetoric yet, Iranian
leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is vowing that the United States and
Israel will soon be "annihilated," even as he refuses to abandon
Iran's nuclear program.
Marking the 19th anniversary of the death of Ayatollah Khomeini,
Ahmadinejad said: "Today, the time for the fall of the satanic
power of the United States has come and the countdown to the
annihilation of the emperor of power and wealth has started."
He also insisted that "I must announce that the Zionist regime
(Israel), with a 60-year record of genocide, plunder, invasion
and betrayal is about to die and will soon be erased from the
geographical scene."
Are Israeli leaders thus planning to launch a massive air attack
on Iran before the end of the year, or even before new national
elections in Israel which may take place as early as November?
Or are they trying to persuade the U.S. to do it before
President Bush leaves office? Perhaps both. Which underscores
the point I've been making for some time -- while we intensify
our efforts to pray for peace in the epicenter, we also need to
be intensifying our efforts to prepare for war.
"An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites looks 'unavoidable'
given the apparent failure of Western sanctions to deny Tehran
technology with bomb-making potential," Deputy Prime Minister
Shaul Mofaz said Friday, according to Reuters report. "If
Iran continues with its program for developing nuclear weapons,
we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," said Mofaz.
http://joelrosenberg.blogspot.com/
There is a reason why such saber rattling makes
international headlines. No serious analyst of events in the
Middle East believes that if a man like Mahmoud Ahmadinejhad
gets nuclear weapons that he will hesitate to use them. Not just
on Israel, but on the U.S as well.
What if, heaven forbid, he is successful?
There are those who speculate that a WMD attack on the
United States may either cripple the country, or cause us to
become steadfastly isolationist, a mere bit player on the world
stage.
Joel's riveting book "Dead Heat" paints a vivid picture on this
possibility. Check out his interview on the Glenn Beck program
at
http://joelrosenberg.blogspot.com/.
So what is possibility number two for the fate of the United
States? Believe it or not, there is an amazingly hopeful
scenario that can make a real difference in the way we live
today.
Check out Scott's Blog tomorrow for the answer!
Scott's Blog - 6/09/08
When Does a Tissue Blob Turn Truly Human?
One of the most frequently debated questions in the
controversy surrounding abortion is a simple one - when does
life begin?
After reading the following story we may want to vary that
debate a bit.
Mother's anger turns to delight after
her baby survives an abortion
Finley Crampton really shouldn't be
here. Although his parents would have loved
another child, they knew their baby could
inherit a life-threatening kidney condition
– and they couldn't take the risk.
After all, their first son had died
of the condition and the second was born
with serious kidney damage.
So when Finley's mother, Jodie
Percival, became pregnant while on the Pill,
she and her fiance Billy Crampton, 35, made
the agonising decision to abort this child.
Survivor: Jodie
Percival and baby Finley who survived an
abortion
'Deciding to terminate at eight weeks
was just utterly horrible but I couldn't
cope with the anguish of losing another
baby,' said Miss Percival, 25.
However, Finley had other ideas. And
some time after the operation, Miss Percival
felt a fluttering in her stomach.
Eventually her doctor sent her for a
scan – and she discovered she was 19 weeks
pregnant.
The child had survived the abortion
and thrived in the womb. 'I couldn't believe
it,' said Miss Percival. 'This was the baby
I thought I'd terminated.
'At first I was angry that this was
happening to us, that the procedure had
failed.
'I wrote to the hospital, I couldn't
believe that they had let me down like this.
They wrote back and apologised and said it
was very rare.'
But a week later, another scan
confirmed that this baby had kidney problems
too, like the couple's previous children.
Miss Percival carries a gene which
triggers multicystic dysplastic kidney –
which causes cysts to grow on the kidneys of
an unborn baby.
Her first baby, Thane, had lived for
only 20 minutes after she was forced to
deliver him prematurely.
Her second son, Lewis, now 20 months,
was born with a similar condition. He
survives on one kidney.
However, doctors told the couple from
Sutton-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, that
this child was likely to survive, so they
decided he deserved a chance.
And in November, Finley was born
three weeks premature, at 6lb 3oz.
He had minor kidney damage but is
expected to lead a normal life.
'I knew if that operation hadn't
failed he wouldn't have been there,' said
Miss Percival, a hairdresser.
'I just couldn't believe that this
child had got through it all and looked so
perfect.
'He may need an operation but as only
one of his kidneys is affected he can
survive.
'I still struggle to believe just
what he has fought through. Now he's here I
wouldn't change it for the world."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1024297/Mothers-anger-turns-delight-baby-survives-abortion.html
Mother and baby doing well.
Isn't that the news we all want to hear
following the arrival of a new life into the
world?
But let's take a step back here and ask a
key question - how would Jodie Percival have
dealt with this situation if her preferred
course of action - aborting baby Finley -
had been successful?
I'm sure well meaning people would have
gone on about it being "the only
compassionate decision".
Or, "It was really for the best as your
baby would not have lived a quality life."
Or perhaps the tried and true, "Well it
was really just a fetus. It wasn't as if you
lost a real baby."
Mother would have been doing well. Baby
Finley? Not so much.
But looking into the child's eyes and
seeing the smile on the face of the happy
mother now makes the usual rationalizations
of abortion seem, well, a bit empty, forced,
even cold.
Which raises the most important question
any human being will ever consider in the
abortion debate.
What amazing moral alchemy took place
between the time the cold and clinical
decision was made to dispatch a defective
tissue blob, and the joy producing arrival
of this true human being we see in the
picture?
Why was this same child at one point
destroyable on a whim, and the next a
possessor of every human right we hold dear?
At what point did this child's life cease
to be a source of anger for Jodie Percival,
and suddenly become something she "wouldn't
change for the world"?
At what point did this same child cease
to be "Disposable Fetus" and suddenly turn
into Finley Crampton?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Perhaps the most
stunning question raised by little Finley
Crampton's successful struggle to make it
through the gauntlet of modern progressive
medical science and be born alive isn't
"When does life begin?"
Maybe fewer
abortions would take place if we had the
honesty to ask, "When does death begin?"
From God's point of
view human life is human life. No matter
which side of the womb we find it on.
For You formed my inward parts;
You covered me in my mother’s womb.
I will praise You, for I am fearfully
and wonderfully made;
Marvelous are Your works,
And that my soul knows very
well.
My frame was not hidden from You,
When I was made in secret,
And skillfully wrought in
the lowest parts of the earth.
Your eyes saw my substance, being yet
unformed.
And in Your book they all were
written,
The days fashioned for me,
When as yet there were none
of them. (Psalm 139:13-16)
|